Mitos y paradojas de los sistemas de investigación

• Autores: Andoni Eizagirre Eizagirre
• Localización: Argumentos de razón técnica: Revista española de ciencia, tecnología y sociedad, y filosofía de la tecnología, ISSN 1139-3327, Nº 15, 2012, págs. 81-109
• Idioma: español
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Myths and paradoxes of scientific policies
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Dialnet Métricas: 1 Cita
• Resumen

  • Este artículo realiza un análisis crítico sobre los mitos y paradojas de los sistemas de investigación. Las interpretaciones que integra y promete el discurso tradicional se ha arraigado no tanto por los supuestos teóricos en los que se sustenta, sino ante todo porque la consolidación de la ciencia se ha modelado en un contexto más amplio de desarrollo industrial y económico. No obstante, las carencias advertidas en la imagen que relaciona automáticamente la innovación y el progreso así como la creciente intermediación del mercado entre el laboratorio y la sociedad hacen insostenible la legitimidad de las políticas científicas en base a los discursos tradicionales. El artículo asume el carácter típicamente sociopolítico del sistema de investigación y sitúa su discusión (sus valores y objetivos) en el contexto social y económico más amplio en el que se desarrolla.

    Palabras clave: sistema de investigación - mitos � ciencia- mercado- política

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • AGAZZI, E., El bien, el mal y la ciencia: las dimensiones éticas de la empresa científico-tecnológica, edición y traducción a cargo de R....
  • ARCHIBUGI, D., “In Defense of Public Science”, Going Global Conference, The Challenges for Knowledge-Based Economies, Helsinki, Finland, September...
  • BAUER, M., SHUKLA, R. & ALLUM, N. (eds.), The Culture of Science: How Does the Public Relate to Science Across the Globe, London, Routledge,...
  • BLUMENTHAL D., CAMPBELL, E.G., CAUSINO, N. & SEASHORE, K., "Participation of Life-science Faculty in Research Relationships with Industry",...
  • BOZEMAN, B., “Public Value Mapping of Science Outcomes: Theory and Method”, Washington, DC, Center for Science, Policy, and Outcomes, 2003.
  • BOZEMAN B. & SAREWITZ, D., “Public Values and Public Failure in US Science Policy”, Science and Public Policy, 32 2, (2005), 119-136.
  • BROWN, N., “Hope Against Hype: Accountability in Biopasts, Presents and Futures”, Science Studies, 16 2, (2003), 3-21.
  • BROWN, N. & MICHAEL, M., “A Sociology of Expectations: Retrospecting Prospects and Prospecting Retrospects”, Technology Analysis and Strategic...
  • BROWN, N., BORUP, M., KONRAD, H. & VAN LENTE, H., “The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology” (special issue), Technology...
  • BRUNNER, R.D. & Ascher, W., "Science and Social Responsibility", Policy Sciences, 25, (1992), 295-331.
  • CHAPMAN, A., Democratizing Technology: Risk, Responsability and the Regulation of Chemicals, Oxford, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers,...
  • CORTNER, H.J., "Making Science Relevant to Environmental Policy", Environmental Science & Policy, 3, (2000), 21-30.
  • CROW, M.M., “None Dare Call It Hubris: The Limits of Knowledge”, Issues in Science and Technology Online , 23 (2), 2007, 1-4.
  • ECHEVERRÍA, J., “El pluralismo axiológico de la ciencia”, Isegoría , 12, (1995), 44-79.
  • ECHEVERRÍA, J., La revolución tecnocientífica, Mexico, FCE, 2003.
  • EIZAGIRRE, A., “La precaución como principio de acción sostenible”. Isegoría, 44, (2011), 303-324.
  • FARRELL, A. & JAEGER, J. (eds.), Assessments of Global and Regional Environmental Risks: Designing Processes for the Effective Use of...
  • FELT, Ulrike, WYNNE, B., STIRLING, A., CALLON, M., GONCALVES, ME. y otros, Science and Governance: taking European Knowledge Society Seriously,...
  • FISCHER, F., Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices, New York, Oxford University Press. 2003.
  • FRAZZETTO, G.,"The Changing Identity of the Scientists", EMBO reports 5 1, (2004), 18-20.
  • FULLER, S., Science, Buckingham, Open University Press, 1997. FULLER, S., The Governance of Science, Buckingham, Open University Press,
  • 2000. GELINGS, A.C. & THIER, S.O. "Medical Innovation and Institutional
  • Interdependence: Rethinking University-Industry Connections", The Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, (2002), 72-77.
  • GODIN, B., The Making of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy: Conceptual Frameworks as Narratives, 1945-2005, Montreal, Centre Urbanisation...
  • GODIN, B. & DORÉ, C., Measuring the Impacts of Science: Beyond the Economic Dimension, Montreal, Centre Urbanisation Culture Société,...
  • GREENBERG, D.S., Science, Money, and Politics: Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2001.
  • GUSTON, D. & Brown, N., “Science, Democracy, and the Rigth to Research”, Sci Eng Ethics, 15, (2009), 351-366.
  • HOPPE, R., “Policy analysis, science and politics: from ‘speaking truth to power’ to ‘making sense together’”, Science and Public Policy,...
  • HORST, M., “Public Expectations of Gene Therapy: Scientific Futures and their Performative Effects on Scientific Citizenship”, Science, Technology...
  • JASANOFF, S., The Fifth Branch: Scientific Advisors as Policymakers, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1990.
  • KAFATOS, F., "A Revolutionary Landscape: The Restructuring of Biology and Its Convergence with Medicine", Journal of Molecular Biology...
  • KENNEY, M., Biotechnology: The University-Industrial Complex, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1986.
  • KOSTOFF, R.N., “The Principles and Practices of Peer Review”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 3, (1997), 19-34.
  • KRIMSKY, S., Science in the Private Interest: Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted Biomedical Research?, Oxford, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers,...
  • http://www.csiic.ca/PDF/TheMakingOfScience.pdf
  • http://www.csiic.ca/PDF/TheMakingOfScience.pdf
  • http://www.csiic.ca/PDF/Godin_Dore_Impacts.pdf
  • http://www.csiic.ca/PDF/Godin_Dore_Impacts.pdf
  • KRIMSKY, S. & Rothenberg, L.S., "Financial Interest and Its Disclosure in Scientific Publications", The Journal of the American...
  • LANE, R., "The Decline of Politics and Ideology in a Knowledgeable Society" American Sociological Review, 31, (1966), 649-662.
  • LASSWELL, H.D., "The Political Science of Science: An Inquiry into the Possible Reconciliation of Mastery and Freedom", American Political...
  • LEDERMAN, L.M., "Science: The End of the Frontier?", Science, 251 4990, (1991), 231.
  • MERTON, R., "A Note on Science and Democracy", Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, (1942), 115-126.
  • MERTON, R.K., La sociología de la ciencia, Madrid, Alianza, 1977. MIROWSKI, P. & VAN HORN, R., “The Contract Research Organization and
  • the Commercialization of Scientific Research” Social Studies of Science, 35 4, (2005), 503-548.
  • MUKERJI, C., A Fragile Power: Scientists and the State, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1989
  • NATURE, "Is the University-industrial Complex out of Control?", Nature 409 6817, (2001), 119.
  • NOWOTNY, H., “Society in Science: The Next Phase in an Impetuous Relationship”,Keynote speech at the Science and Society Forum, Brussels,...
  • OWEN-SMITH, J., RICCABONI, M., PAMMOLLI, F. & POWELL, W.W., "A Comparison of U.S. and European University-Industry Relations in the...
  • PARSON, E. & CLARK, W., “Sustainable Development and Social Learning”. Faculty Research Working Paper Series, 1993, R93-47.
  • POLANYI, M., "The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory", Minerva 1, 1962, 54-73.
  • PRICE, H. D. de S., The Scientific Estate, New York, Oxford University Press, 1965.
  • PRIMACK, Joel R. & F. VON HIPPEL, Advise and Dissent: Scientists in the Political Arena, New York, NY, Basic Books, Inc, 1994.
  • SÁNCHEZ RON, J.M., “Ciencia, científicos y guerra en el siglo XX: algunas cuestiones ético-morales” Isegoría 12, (1995), 119-136
  • SAREWITZ, D., Frontiers of Illusion: Science, Technology and the Politics of Progress, Philadelphia, Temple of University Press, 1996,
  • SAREWITZ, D. & PIELKE, R.A., “The Neglected Heart of Science Policy: Reconciling Supply of and Demand for Science”, Environmental Science...
  • SCHNEIDER, A.L. & INGRAM, H., Policy Design for Democracy, Lawrence, KS, University Press of Kansas, 1997.
  • SELIN, C., “Expectations and the Emergence of Nanotechnology”, Science, Technology and Human Values, 32 2, (2007), 196-220.
  • SERVICE, R.F.."Berkeley Puts all Its Eggs in Two Baskets", Science 286 5438, (1999), 226-227.
  • SNOW, C.P., The New Man, London, Macmillan, 1957. TAVERNE, D., “Let's be Sensible About Public Participation”, Nature 432
  • 7011, (2004), 883. THACKRAY, A.,(ed.), Private Science: Biotechnology and the Rise of the
  • Molecular Sciences, Philadelphia, University of Philadelphia Press, 1998. WEINBERG, S., Dreams of a Final Theory, New York, Pantheon, 1993....
  • How to Ensure that Science Really Matters, London, Demos, 2005. WINNER, L., The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High
  • Technology, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1989. WOLPERT, L., The Unnatural Nature of Science, London, Faber, 1992 WYNNE, B., "Creating...
  • GMOs", Science as Cultures 10 4, (2011), 445-481. WYNNE, B., "Risk and Environmental as Legitimatory Discourses of
  • Technology: Reflexivity Inside Out?", Current Sociology 50 3, (2002), 459-477.
  • ZIMAN, J., "Why Must Scientists Become More Ethically Sensitive Than They Used to Be?", Science, 282 5395, (1998), 1813-1814.