Argumentando los derechos de los no humanos: el caso de la ética de la información de L. Floridi

• Autores: Eduardo Bustos
• Localización: Revista iberoamericana de argumentación, ISSN-e 2172-8801, Nº. 6, 2013 (Ejemplar dedicado a: II ENCUENTRO INTERNACIONAL SOBRE ARGUMENTACIÓN), págs. 68-87
• Idioma: español
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Bartha, P. A. (2010), By Parallel Reasoning: The Construction and Evaluation of Analogical Arguments, Oxford: Oxford U. Press.
  • Bermejo, L. (2011), Giving Reasons: A Linguistic-Pragmatic Approach to Argumentation Theory, Londres: Springer.
  • Bustos, E. de (2006) “Metáforas de la individualidad moral y fundamentos de bioética” ,Isegoría, 34, 47-61.
  • Bynum,T. W. and Rogerson, S. (eds.), (2004) Computer Ethics and Professional Responsibilty, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Floridi, L. (1999), “Information ethics: on the philosophical foundation of computer ethics”, Ethics and Information Technology, 1, 1, 37-56.
  • Floridi, L. (2002), “On the intrinsic value of information objects and the infosphere”, Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 287-304.
  • Floridi, L. (2004), "Information" in The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information, edited by L. Floridi, Oxford:...
  • Floridi, L. (2005). “Information Ethics: Its Nature and Scope”, Computers and Society, 36,3, 21–36.
  • Floridi, L. (2007) “Understanding Information Ethics”, APA Newsletter on Philosophy andComputers 7,1, http://76.12.57.18/publications/newsletters/v07n1...
  • Floridi L. (2008a), “Information Ethics, its Nature and Scope”, in van den Hoven, J. and J.Weckert (eds.), (2008), 40–65.
  • Floridi, L. (2008b). “The Method of Levels of Abstraction”, Minds and Machines, 18(3), 303–329.
  • Floridi, L. (2010), “Information Ethics”, en L. Floridi, ed. (2010), 77-100.
  • Floridi, L. (2011), The Philosophy of Information, Oxford: Oxford U. Press.
  • Floridi, L, y J. W. Sanders (2001), “Artificial evil and the foundations of computer ethics”, Ethicsand Information Technology, 3: 55-66.
  • Floridi, L. y J. W. Sanders (2002), “Mapping the foundationalist debate in computer ethics”, Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 1-9.
  • Floridi, L. ed. (2010), The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press.
  • Grice, H. P. (1989), Studies in the Way of Words, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard U. Press.
  • Hinma K. E. y H. T. Tavani, eds. (2008), The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, New Jersey: J. Wiley
  • Maner, W. (2004), ‘Unique Ethical Problems in Information Technology’, in Bynum,T. W. and Rogerson, S. (eds.), (2004), 39–59.
  • Siponen, M. (2004), “A pragmatic evaluation of the theory of information ethics”, Ethics and Information Technology, 6: 279-290.
  • Tavani, H. (2001), “The state of computer ethics as a philosophical field of inquiry: some contemporary perspectives, future projections...
  • Tavani, H. T. (2002) “The Uniqueness Debate in Computer Ethics: What Exactly Is at Issue, and Why Does it Matter?”, Ethics and Information...
  • Tavani, H. T. (2005). “The Impact of the Internet on Our Moral Condition: Do We Need a New Framework of Ethics?”, in R. Cavalier (ed.), The...
  • Toulmin, S. (1958), The Uses of Argument, Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press.
  • van den Hoven, J. (2008), “Moral Methodology and Information Technology” en K. E. Hinma y H. T. Tavani, eds. (2008), 49-69.
  • van den Hoven, J. and J. Weckert (eds.), (2008), Information Technology and Moral Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University...