Acceso usuarios
Pulat Tacar, Maxime Gauin
We have been asked by the European Journal of International Law to write a reply to an article entitled "State Identity, Continuity and Responsibility: The Ottoman Empire, the Republic of Turkey and the Armenian Genocide". The article accuses Turkey of "practising a denialist policy" with regard to "the act of genocide committed during 1915�1916", demanding that it "make itself responsible for its own internationally wrongful acts committed against Armenians and other Christian minorities", and also accuses it of "expanding the massacres beyond its borders into the Caucasus and the territories of the independent Republic of Armenia". According to the same article, there is a state succession and continuation of responsibility from the Ottoman Empire to the Turkish Republic, and the Republic must assume full responsibility for and should also repair the injury caused by the Ottoman Empire.
The Armenian question is especially sensitive, among other reasons because of the long accumulation of prejudices against Turks,1 Armenian terrorism in 1973�1991, the Armenian invasion and occupation of western Azerbaijan since 1992, and more recently the virulent anti-Turkish stance of Anders Breivik in his manifesto4 and the various campaigns or attacks by Armenian nationalists. Instead of easing the tensions, the article fuels them through the provocative, defaming, irredentist remarks of its author who harbours in his writings the colours of a political pamphleteer.
On this sensitive issue our main objective is to restore much-needed understanding and fair as well as reconciliatory dialogue between the Armenian and Turkish people and all interested parties, including scholars.
"The right to truth" encompasses all aspects of the truth and all the pages of history; in short, "a just memory". Thus, initiatives for dialogue between those who defend different views should be promoted. In this respect, the creation ...
