Los acuerdos matrimoniales en Inglaterra y Gales tras Radmacher v. Granatino: Equidad, libertad y "elementos extranjeros"

• Jens M. Scherpe ^[1]
  1. [1] University of Cambridge

     University of Cambridge

     Cambridge District, Reino Unido

     
• Localización: Indret: Revista para el Análisis del Derecho, ISSN-e 1698-739X, Nº. 2, 2012, 24 págs.
• Idioma: español
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Dialnet Métricas: 9 Citas
• Resumen

  • La largamente esperada sentencia del Tribunal Supremo del Reino Unido, Radmacher v. Granatino ([2010] UKSC 42, [2011] 1 FLR 1851), ha sido vista por algunos como un golpe contra el status matrimonial y su importancia. Por el contrario, este artículo considera que la sentencia alcanza un equilibrio razonable entre el paternalismo y la autonomía de las partes y que, aplicada correctamente, no amenaza la protección del cónyuge más débil y de los menores. Además, la sentencia es perfectamente coherente con los desarrollos experimentados en Europa (y de hecho, en las jurisdicciones de todo el mundo occidental). La incertidumbre, criticada por otros, es de hecho necesaria, inevitable e incluso deseable en un sistema de ancillary relief que normalmente otorga discrecionalidad a la autoridad judicial para decidir sobre los aspectos financieros del divorcio.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • BOELE-WOELKI y JÄNTERÄ-JAREBORG (2011), “Initial Results of the Work of the CEFL in the Field of Property Relations Between Spouses”,...
  • BRIGGS (2012), “Marital Agreements and Private Autonomy in New Zealand“, en SCHERPE(Coord.), Marital Agreements and Private Autonomy...
  • BULL (2010), “More questions than answers“, Law Society Gazette, Vol. 10, núm 2, pp. 28 y ss.
  • COOKE, BARLOW y CALLUS (2006), Community of property - a regime for England and Wales?,Nuffield Foundation, London.
  • COOKE (2011), “The Law Commission’s Consultation on Marital Property Agreements”, Family Law, pp. 145 y ss.
  • CRETNEY (2011), “Foreword”, en GILMORE, HERRING y PROBERT (Coords.), Landmark Cases in Family Law, Hart Publishing, pp. 6 y ss.
  • DAUNER-LIEB (2010), “Gütertrennung zwischen Privatautonomie und Inhaltskontrolle”, Archiv für die civilistische Praxis (AcP), núm 210,...
  • DETHLOFF (2011), “Contracting in Family Law: A European Perspective”, en BOELE-WOELKI, MILES y SCHERPE (Coords.), The Future of Family...
  • DUTTA (2012), “Marital Agreements and Private Autonomy in Germany”, en SCHERPE (Coord.), Marital Agreements and Private Autonomy...
  • ELLMAN (2012), “Marital Agreements and Private Autonomy in the United States”, en SCHERPE(Coord.), Marital Agreements and Private...
  • FEHLBERG y SMYTH (2002), “Binding Pre-Nuptial Agreements in Australia: The First Year”, International Journal of Law, Policy and...
  • FERRER RIBA (2012), “Marital Agreements and Private Autonomy in Spain”, en SCHERPE (Coord.), Marital Agreements and Private Autonomy ...
  • GRAY (1996), “Property in Common Law Systems”, en VAN MAANEN y VAN DER WALT (Eds.), Property Law on the Threshold of the 21st Century,...
  • GRAY y GRAY (2009), Elements of Land Law, 5ª ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • HARPER y FRANKLE (2012), “An English Practitioner’s View on Pre-nuptial, Post-nuptial and Separation Agreements”, en SCHERPE...
  • HERRING (2010), “20:10:2010“, New Law Journal, núm. 160, pp. 1551 y ss.
  • HERRING, HARRIS y GEORGE (2011a), “Ante-nuptial agreements: fairness, equality and presumptions“, Law Quarterly Review, núm....
  • HERRING, HARRIS y GEORGE (2011b), “With this ring I thee wed (terms and conditions apply)“, Family Law, pp. 367 y ss.
  • HOOKER (2001), “Prenuptial Contracts and Safeguards”, Family Law, núm. 56, pp. 57 y ss.
  • HODSON (2011), “English Marital Agreements for International Families after Radmacher”, International Family Law, pp. 31 y ss.
  • JÄNTERA-JAREBORG (2012), “Marital Agreements and Private Autonomy in Sweden”, en SCHERPE(coord.), Marital Agreements and Private Autonomy...
  • JESSEP (2010), “Section 90G and Pt VIIIA of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)”, Australian Journal of Family Law, núm. 24, pp. 104 y ss.
  • JESSEP(2012), “Marital Agreements and Private Autonomy in Australia”, en SCHERPE (Coord.), Marital Agreements and Private Autonomy...
  • LEONG (2010a), “The Law in Singapore on Rights and Responsibilities in Marital Agreements”, Singapore Journal of Legal Studies,...
  • LEONG (2010b), “The Law in Singapore on Rights and Responsibilities in Marital Agreements“, The Sydney Law Review, pp. 289 y ss.
  • LEONG (2012), “Marital Agreements and Private Autonomy in Singapore”, en SCHERPE (Coord.), Marital Agreements and Private Autonomy...
  • MILES (2011), “Marriage and Divorce in the Supreme Court: for Love or Money? ”, Modern Law Review, núm. 74, pp. 431 y ss.
  • MILES (2012), “Marital Agreements and Private Autonomy in England and Wales”, en SCHERPE(Coord.), Marital Agreements and Private...
  • PINTENS (2009a), “Ehegüterstände in Europa”, en Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht (ZEuP), pp. 268 y ss.
  • PINTENS (2009b), “Ehegüterrecht”, en Basedow, Hopt y Zimmermann (Coords.), Handwörterbuch des Europäischen Privatrechts (Mohr Siebeck),...
  • PINTENS (2011), “Matrimonial Property Law in Europe”, en BOELE-WOELKI, MILES y SCHERPE (Coords.), The Future of Family Property in Europe,...
  • ONG (2009), “Prenuptial agreements: a Singaporean perspective in TQ v TR“,Children and Family Law Quarterly, pp. 536 y ss.
  • SCHERPE (2007), “A Comparative View of Pre-Nuptial Agreements”, International Family Law, pp. 18 y ss.
  • SCHERPE (2012), Marital Agreements and Private Autonomy in Comparative Perspective, Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp. 443-518.
  • SCHERPE y DUTTA (2010), “Cross-border enforcement of English ancillary relief orders – Fog in the channel, Europe cut off? “,...
  • SLOAN (2012), Informal Carers and Private Law, Hart Publishing, Oxford.
  • WILSON (2011), “An Australian Perspective on International Pre-Nuptial Agreements”, en SALTER, BUTRUILLE-CARDEW, FRANCIS...