Neutralidad de la Red: historia, regulación y futuro = Network Neutrality: history, regulation and future

• Autores: Christopher Thomas Marsden
• Localización: IDP: revista de Internet, derecho y política = revista d'Internet, dret i política, ISSN-e 1699-8154, Nº. 13, 2012 (Ejemplar dedicado a: VII Congreso Internacional Internet, Derecho y Política. Neutralidad de la red y otros retos para el futuro de Internet), págs. 24-43
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.7238/idp.v0i13.1394
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo  1    2  
• Dialnet Métricas: 5 Citas
• Resumen

  • Este artículo se centra en el reto global de la política de neutralidad en la red: ¿Podrán los gobiernos garantizar un mayor acceso a Internet aún más rápido, mientras apoyan a las expectativas de los usuarios y los proveedores de contenidos de que la censura y la filtración de sus contenidos se mantengan a un mínimo democrática y económicamente necesario? O ¿el acceso a Internet abierto se relegará a un carril comparativamente lento, con carriles rápidos reservados para servicios de vídeo, telefonía y otros servicios favorecidos afiliados a los proveedores de servicios de acceso a Internet? La reglamentación de las comunicaciones de telefonía, radiodifusión e Internet (incluido el comercio electrónico) depende de las soluciones a estas preguntas, agrupadas en el principio, convertido en slogan, de neutralidad en la red.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • AMMORI, M. (2010). «How I lost the big one bigtime».
  • AYRES, I.; BRAITHWAITE, J. (1992). Responsive regulation. Transcending the deregulation debate.Hartford, CT: Yale University Press.
  • BAUER, Johannes M. (2010). «Learning from each other: promises and pitfalls of benchmarking incommunications policy». Info. Vol....
  • BENKLER, Y. (1998a). «Communications infrastructure regulation and the distribution of control overcontent» [en línea]. Telecommunications...
  • BENKLER, Y. (1998b) «Overcoming agoraphobia: building the commons of the digitally networkedenvironment» [en línea]. Harvard Journal...
  • BENKLER, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks. How social production transforms markets and freedom.New Haven, CT y Londres: Yale University...
  • BERNERS LEE, Tim (2006). «Net neutrality: this is serious». [21/06/2006, 16:35].
  • BITAG (2011). By-laws of Broadband Industry Technical Advisory Group.
  • BOYLE, J. (2008). The public domain: enclosing the commons of the mind. New Haven, CT: Yale Uni-versity Press.
  • BURSTEIN, D. (2008). «Comcast’s fair 250 gig bandwidth cap». Fast Net News. DSL Prime, Docsisreport, 21 octubre.
  • BURSTEIN, D. (2011). «Wireline costs and caps: a few facts». Fast Net News. DSL Prime, 6 marzo.
  • CARNOY, M.; CASTELLS, M.; COHEN, S. S.; CARDOSO, F. H. (1993). The new global economy in theinformation age; reflections on...
  • CAVE, M.; VAN EIJK, N.; PROSPERETTI, L. [et al.] (2009). «Statement by European academics on theinappropriateness of imposing increased Internet...
  • CHERRY, Barbara A. (2006). «Misusing network neutrality to eliminate common carriage threatensfree speech and the postal system»....
  • CHERRY, Barbara A. (2008). «Back to the future: how transportation deregulatory policies fore-shadow evolution of communications policies»....
  • CISCO (2011). Cisco visual networking index: global mobile data traffic forecast update, 2010-2015.CLARK,
  • David D. (1988). «The design philosophy of the DARPA Internet protocols». Computer Com-munications Review. Vol. 18, n.º 4, agosto,...
  • CLARK David D.; BLUMENTHAL, Marjory S. (2011). «The end-to-end argument and application design:the role of trust». Federal Communications...
  • Código noruego (2009). «Guidelines for net neutrality».
  • Comcast v. FCC (2010). Sentencia del tribunal de apelaciones de los Estados Unidos, Circuito del Dis-trito de Columbia, del 6 de abril. N.º...
  • COMISIÓN EUROPEA (2002). Better regulation action plan. COM 278. Bruselas.
  • COMISIÓN EUROPEA (2010a). A digital agenda for Europe. COM 245. Bruselas.
  • COMISIÓN EUROPEA (2010b). Consultation on the future of the universal service obligation. Neutralidad en la Red: Historia, legislación...
  • CRAWFORD, S. (2011). The big squeeze: the looming cable monopoly [en preparación].
  • CROWCROFT, J. (2011). «The affordance of asymmetry or a rendezvous with the random?». Communications and Convergence Review. Vol. 3, n.º 1.
  • CRTC (2011). Usage-based billing for Gateway Access Services and third-party Internet access services.Telecom Decision 2011-44. File number:...
  • DE BEER, J. (2009). «Network neutrality in the Great White North (and its impact on Canadian cul-ture)». Telecommunications...
  • DE SOLA POOL, I. (1983). Technologies of freedom. Cambridge MA: Belknap.
  • DEIBERT, R. J.; PALFREY, J. G.; ROHOZINSKI, R.; ZITTRAIN, J. (eds) (2010). Access controlled: the sha-ping of power, rights, and rule in cyberspace....
  • Digital Economy Act (2010).
  • DONAHUE, H. (2010). «The network neutrality inquiry». Info. Vol. 12, nº 2, pág.3-8.
  • DUNSTONE, C. (2006). Presentation by Carphone Warehouse/TalkTalk CEO at the 2006 Ofcom confe-rence.
  • ECONOMIDES, N.; TÅG, J. (2007). Net neutrality on the Internet: a two-sided market analysis. WorkingPaper. Nueva York: NYU Center for Law...
  • FAULHABER, Gerald R. (2002). «Network effects and merger analysis: instant messaging and theAOL-Time Warner case». Telecommunications...
  • FAULHABER, Gerald R. (2010). «Transparency and broadband Internet service providers». International Journal of Communication. Vol. 4, pág....
  • FCC (2005). Appropriate framework for broadband access to the Internet over wireline facilities et al. Policy statement, 20 FCC Rcd 14986...
  • FCC (2010). In the matter of preserving the open Internet broadband industry practices. GN Docket No.09-191, WC Docket No. 07-52. Report and...
  • FGI (Foro de Gobernanza de Internet (FGI) (2008). «Network neutrality: examining the issues andimplications for development»....
  • FGI (Foro de Gobernanza de Internet (FGI) (2009). Programme, format and schedule for the 2009meeting. Revisión del 4 de junio...
  • FRIEDEN, Rob (2010a). Winning the silicon sweepstakes: can the United States compete in global tele-communications? Hartford, CT: Yale University...
  • FRIEDEN, Rob (2010b). «Invoking and avoiding the First Amendment: how Internet service providersleverage their status as both content creators...
  • FRIEDEN, Rob (2011). «A layered and nuanced assessment of network neutrality rationales». En: Til-burg TILEC Workshop on Law...
  • GAINES, S. E.; KIMBER, C. (2001). «Redirecting self-regulation». Environmental Law. Vol. 13, n.º 2, pág.157-184.
  • GEIST, Michael (2011a). «Unpacking the policy issues behind bandwidth caps & usage based billing». 1febrero.
  • GEIST, Michael (2011b). «Canada’s usage based billing controversy: how to address the wholesale andretail issues». Marzo 2011.
  • HARRIS, Susan; GERICH, Elise (1996). «Retiring the NSFNET backbone service: chronicling the end ofan era». ConneXions.Vol. 10, n.º 4, abril.
  • HART, Jeffrey A. (2011). «The net neutrality debate in the United States». Journal of InformationTechnology & Politics....
  • HASLINGER, Gerhard; NUNZI, Giorgio; MEIROSU, Catalin; FAN, Changpeng; ANDERSEN, Frank-Uwe (2011). «Traffic engineering supported...
  • KIEDROWSKI, T. (2007). «Net neutrality: Ofcom’s view».
  • LABOVITZ, C; IEKEL-JOHNSON, S.: MCPHERSON, D.; OBERHEIDE, J.; JAHANIAN, F.; KARIR, M. (2009). ATLAS Internet Observatory Annual Report,...
  • LEMLEY, M. A.; LESSIG, L. (1999). Ex Parte declaration of Professor Mark A. Lemley and ProfessorLawrence Lessig in the matter...
  • LESSIG, L. (1999a). Code and other laws of cyberspace. Nueva York: Basic Books.
  • LESSIG, L. (1999b). «The limits in open code: regulatory standards and the future of the Net». Berke-ley Technology Law Journal. Vol. 14,...
  • LESSIG, L.; WU, T. (2003). Letter to the FCC Ex parte, 22 agosto 2003.
  • MALIK, O. (2010). «U.S. mobile data traffic to top 1 exabyte». 7 noviembre.
  • MARSDEN, C. (2001). «The start of end-to-end? Internet protocol television». Intermedia. N.º 29,pág. 4-8.
  • MARSDEN, C. (2010a). Net neutrality: towards a co-regulatory solution. Londres: Bloomsbury Aca-demic.
  • MARSDEN, C. (2010b). «Appeals Court demolishes FCC legal argument for ancillary jurisdictionwithout Title I argument in Comcast»....
  • MARSDEN, C. (2011). Internet co-regulation: European law and regulatory legitimacy in cyberspace.Cambridge: Cambridge University...
  • MARSDEN, C.; CAVE, J. et al. (2006). Assessing indirect impacts of the EC proposals for video regula-tion, TR-414 for Ofcom. Santa Monica,...
  • MARSDEN, C.; SIMMONS, S.; BROWN, I.; WOODS, L.; PEAKE, A., ROBINSON, N. et al. (2008). «Optionsfor and effectiveness of Internet self-...
  • MAYER-SCHONBERGER, V. (2008). «Demystifying Lessig». Wisconsin Law Review. N.º 4, pág. 713-746.
  • MEISEL, J. P. (2010). «Trinko and mandated access to the Internet». Info. Vol. 12, n.º 2, pág. 9-27.
  • MINTS (2007). Methodology. Página actualizada el 30 de agosto.
  • MINTS (2009). MINTS pages updated, many new reports, further slight slowdown in wireline trafficgrowth rate. 17 noviembre.
  • MUELLER, M. (1998). Universal service: competition, interconnection, and monopoly in the making.Washington DC: AEI Press.
  • MUELLER, M. (2007). «Net neutrality as global principle for Internet governance». Internet Gover-nance Project Paper IGP07-003.
  • NOAM, E. M. (1994). «Beyond liberalization II: the impending doom of common carriage». Telecommunications Policy. Vol. 18, n.º 6, pág. 435-452.
  • NOAM, E. M. (2008). «Beyond net neutrality: enduser sovereignty». Columbia University Draft Paperfor 34th Telecoms Policy Research Conference,...
  • OCDE (2008). OECD Broadband portal, table 5(m): Time to reach bit/data caps at advertised speeds.Septiembre 2008.
  • OCDE (2010). OECD Broadband portal, table 1l: Percentage of fibre connections in total broadbandamong countries reporting fibre...
  • ODLYZKO, Andrew; LEVINSON, David (2007). «Too expensive to meter: the influence of transactioncosts in transportation and communication» [borrador]....
  • OFCOM (2006). Market impact assessment: BBC new on-demand video proposals.
  • OFTEL (2000). Draft Direction under Condition 45 of the Public Telecommunications Licence grantedto British Telecommunications plc of a dispute...
  • ORECE (Organismo de Reguladores Europeos de las Comunicaciones Electrónicas) (2010). BEREC Response to the European Commission’s...
  • PALFREY, J.; GASSER, U. (2008). Born digital: understanding the first generation of digital natives.Nueva York: Basic Books.
  • POST, D. (2009). In search of Jefferson’s Moose: notes on the state of cyberspace. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
  • REIDENBERG, J. (2005). «Technology and Internet jurisdiction». University of Pennsylvania LawReview. Vol. 153, n.º 6, p. 1951-1974.
  • RENDA, A. (2008). I own the pipes, you call the tune: the net neutrality debate and its (ir)relevance forEurope. CEPS Special Reports. Bruselas:...
  • ROONEY, BEN (2011). «Net neutrality debate in Europe Is ‘Over’». 28 febrero.
  • ROSSTON, G. I.; TOPPER, M. D. (2010). «An antitrust analysis of the case for wireless net neutrality».Information Economics and Policy. Vol....
  • SALTZER J. H.; REED, D.; CLARK, D. (1981). «End to end arguments in system design». En: SecondInternational Conf. on Distributed...
  • SCHRAGE, M. (2000). «The debriefing: John Seely Brown». Wired. N.º 8.08, agosto.
  • SEELY BROWN J.; DUGUID, P. (2000). The social life of information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard BusinessSchool Press.
  • SLUIJS, Jasper P. (2010). «Network neutrality between false positives and false negatives: introducing a European approach to...
  • TAMBINI, L.; MARSDEN, C. (2008). Codifying cyberspace: communications self-regulation in the age ofinternet convergence. Londres: Routledge.
  • TAPSCOTT, D. (1999). Growing up digital: the rise of the net generation. Nueva York: McGraw Hill.
  • TEUBNER, G. (1986). «The transformation of law in the welfare state». En: G. TEUBNER (ed.). Dilemmas of law in the welfare...
  • THINKBROADBAND (2009). Average mobile broadband speed clocks in at 0.9 meg. 10 junio.
  • UNIÓN EUROPEA (2003). Inter institutional agreement.
  • VAIZEY, Ed (2011). Hansard HC Deb, 5 abril 2011, c259WH.
  • WACLAWSKY, J. G. (2005). «IMS 101: What you need to know now». Business Communications Review.Junio 2005, pág. 18-23.
  • WEISER, P. (2009). «The future of Internet regulation». U.C. Davis Law Review. Vol. 43, n.º 2, pág.529-590.Neutralidad en la Red: Historia,...
  • WERBACH, Kevin (2005). «The Federal Computer Commission». North Carolina Law Review. Vol. 84,n.º 1, pág. 21.
  • WERBACH, Kevin (2010). «Off the hook». Cornell Law Review. Vol. 95, pág. 535.
  • WU, T. (2003a). «When code isn’t law» [en línea]. Virginia Law Review. Vol. 89, pág. 679.
  • WU, T. (2003b). «Network neutrality, broadband discrimination». Journal of Telecommunications andHigh Technology Law [en línea]. Vol. 2, pág....
  • WU, T. (2007). Wireless net neutrality: cellular carterfone and consumer choice in mobile broadband.New America Foundation Wireless Future...
  • YOO, C. (2010). «The changing patterns of Internet USAGE». Federal Communications Law Journal.Vol. 63, n.º1, pág. 67-90.
  • ZITTRAIN, J. (2008). The future of the Internet and how to stop it. New Haven, CT: Yale University