Acceso usuarios
Joseph H. H. Weiler
EJIL receives hundreds of unsolicited articles each year. We welcome these submissions. They are an important part of who we are. They constitute the pool from which, alongside the pieces we commission ourselves, we build our individual issues. A few of the submissions are just awful. But most are good and, naturally, we receive many more fine articles than we are able to publish. We know it is disappointing for authors to receive a rejection letter. We truly hope that authors will not give up on us if they are not always successful with this or that submission.
In 21 years we have never laid bare our selection and editorial process. This is not exactly an apology: at one time or another I have sat on the Editorial, Advisory, Scientific and other such Boards of over 23 different journals and do not recall ever seeing another journal doing such. Be that as it may, I decided that both our authors and readers should know how the process works.
I also compiled some basic aggregate statistics on our authors over the first 20 years of EJIL � and slightly more detailed stats from the last two years. (Relax, nothing personal � country of submission, gender, etc.) We ourselves were surprised by some of the results. But first things first: How is the selection of articles for publication made? The key thing to note is that EJIL functions with a skeletal staff. Anny Bremner, our redoubtable Managing Editor, works out of Florence and EJIL is but one of her many tasks. Karine Caunes, the current Associate Editor, works out of NYU and EJIL is but one of her many tasks. I estimate that for both of them EJIL takes about a third to half of their time. Our copy-editors work freelance and �
