Inteligencia Artificial y Derecho: a vuelapluma

• Autores: Pompeu Casanovas
• Localización: Teoría y derecho: revista de pensamiento jurídico, ISSN 1888-3443, Nº. 7, 2010, págs. 203-222
• Idioma: español
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Dialnet Métricas: 9 Citas
• Referencias bibliográficas
  • AGUILÓ REGLA, J. Informática jurídica, lenguajes documentales y técnica legislativa, Universidad de Alicante, 1989.
  • AGUILÓ, J. (Coord.). Tecnologías Convergentes NBIC. Situación y Perspectiva 2005. CSIC, 2005.
  • AIKENHEAD, M. “A Discourse on Law and Artifi cial Intelligence”, Law and Technology Journal vol. 5, n. 1, 1996, http://www.law.warwick.ac.uk/ltj/5-1c.html
  • ALEVEN, V. and ASHLEY, K.D. “Teaching Case-Based Argumentation Th rough a Model and Examples”, Proc. 8th World Conf. AI in Ed. Soc. IOS Press:...
  • ALEXY, R. Teoría de la Argumentación Jurídica: Teoría del discurso racional como teoría de la fundamentación jurídica, Centro de Estudios...
  • ANTONIOU, G.; van HARMELEN, F. A Semantic Web Premier (2004), New Haven, The MIT Press, 2008, 2ª ed.,
  • ANTONIOU, G.; van HARMELEN, F. Manual de la Web Semántica, Ed. Comares, Granada, 2010.
  • ASHLEY, K.D.; DESAI, R.; LEVINE, J.M. “Teaching Case-Based Argumentation Concepts using Dialectic Argu-ments vs. Didactic Explanations”, in...
  • ASHLEY, K.D. “Designing Electronic Casebooks that Talk Back: The CATO Program”, 40 Jurimetrics Journal, 2000, pp. 275-319.
  • ATIENZA, M.; RUIZ MANERO, J. Las piezas del derecho. Teoría de los enunciados jurídicos. Ed. Ariel, Barcelona, 1996.
  • ATTFIELD, S.; BLANFORD, A. E-discovery viewed as integrated human-computer sensemaking: The challenge of ‘frames’, 2008, http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/9135/1/9135.pdf
  • AXELROD, R. The complexity of cooperation: agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton studies in complexity. Princeton...
  • BARABUCCI, G.; CERVONE, L.; PALMIRANI, M.; PERONI, M.; VITALI, F. “Multi-layer markup and ontologi-cal structures in Akoma Ntoso”, en P. Casanovas...
  • BAYÓN, J. C., “Why is legal reasoning defeasible?”, in A. Soeteman, Pluralism and Law, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 2001, pp. 327-346.
  • BENCH-CAPON, T.; FREEMAN, J.B.; HOHMANN, H.; PRAKKEN, H. “Computational Models, Argumentation Th eories, and Legal Practice”, en C. Reed y...
  • BENCH-CAPON, T.J.M.; DUNE, P. “Argumentation in AI and Law: editors’ introduction”. Artifi cial Intelligence and Law, vol. 13, n.1, 2005,...
  • BENJAMINS, V.R.; CASANOVAS, P.; BREUKER, J.; GANGEMI, A. Law and the Semantic Web. Legal Ontologies, Methodologies, Legal Information Retrieval,...
  • BERMAN, D.; HAFNER, C. “The Potential of Artifi cial Intelligence to Help Solve the Crisis in Our Legal System”, Communications of the ACM,...
  • BERNERS-LEE, T. The Mobile Web Initiative at the World Wide Web Consortium. WC3. 2005, www.w3.org/2005/ Talks/1103-sb-mit-mwi/
  • BOCHEREAU, L.; BOURCIER, D.; BOURGINE, P. “Extracting Legal Knowledge by Means of a Multilayer Neural Network Application to Municipal Jurisprudence”,...
  • BOER, A.; van ENGERS Tom M.; WINKELS, R. “Using Ontologies for Comparing and Harmonizing Legislation”, ICAIL 2003, pp. 60-69.
  • BONABEAU, E.; DORIGO, M.; THERAULTZ, G. Swarm Intelligence. From Central to Artifi cial Systems. Santa Fe Institute Strudies in Sciences of...
  • BOURCIER, D. (P.CASANOVAS, ed.), Inteligencia artifi cial y derecho, UOC, Barcelona, 2003.BRANTING, K. “Reasoning with Portions of Precedents”....
  • BREUKER, J.; CASANOVAS, P.; KLEIN, M.C.A.; FRANCESCONI, E. (Eds.) Law, Ontologies and The Semantic Web. Channelling the Legal Information...
  • BREUKER, J. “Constructing a legal core ontology: LRI-Core” http://www.ws.onto.ufal.br/Papers/brazil-2004-onto-logy-ws.pdf
  • BROOKS, R.A. “Intelligence without representation”, Artifi cial Intelligence 47, 1991, pp. 139-159.
  • BROOKS, R.A. Cambrian Intelligence: The Early History of the New AI. Mass., The MIT Press, 1999.
  • BUCHANAN, B. G. “A (Very) Brief History of Artifi cial Intelligence. AI Magazine 26, n. 4, 2005, pp. 53-60. http://www.aaai.org/AITopics/bbhist.html...
  • CASANOVAS, P.; SARTOR, G.; CASELLAS, N.; RUBINO, R. (Eds.) Computable Models of the Law. Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies, LNAI, 4884,...
  • CASANOVAS, P. (Ed.) Internet y pluralismo jurídico. Formas emergentes de regulación. Ed. Comares, Granada, 2003.
  • CASANOVAS, P. “La argumentación en derecho: supuestos pragmáticos y cognitivos para la construcción de sistemas inteligentes”, en C. Lozares...
  • CASANOVAS, P. “ The Future of Law: Relational Law and Next Generation of Web Services”, Fernández-Barrera M. et al. (Eds.) The Future of...
  • CASANOVAS, P.; CASELLAS, N.; VALLBÉ, J.J.; FERNANDEZ-BARRERA, M. Web Semántica y Ontologías Jurídi-cas. Ed. Comares, Granada, 2010
  • CASANOVAS, P.; PAGALLO, U.; AJANI, G; SARTOR, G. (Eds.) AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems (AICOL I-II) The Semantic Web, multilingual...
  • CASANOVAS, P.; POBLET, M. “Justice via the Internet: Hopes and Challenges of Law and the Semantic Web”, G. Peruginelli, M. Ragona (eds.),...
  • CASELLAS, N.; FRANCESCONI, E.; HOEKSTRA, R.; MONTEMAGNI, S. Proceedings of 3rd Workshop on Legal Ontologies and Artifi cial Intelligence Techniques...
  • CASELLAS, N. Modelling Legal Knowledge Th rough Ontologies. OPJK: the Ontology of Professional Judicial Knowledge, Doctoral Dissertation,...
  • CASTELFRANCHI, C. “Symposium on Cognition and Rationality: Part I. Relationships between rational decisions, human motives, and emotions”....
  • CASTELLS, M. (1996). The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. 1. The Rise of the Network Society (revised edition 2000), Oxford,...
  • CASTELLS, M. The Internet Galaxy: Refl ections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Oxford University Press, 2001.
  • DAVENPORT, E. “Social intelligence in the age of networks”, Journal of Information Science, vol. 26, num. 3,, 2000, pp. 145-152.
  • DAVIES, J.; STUDER, R.; WARREN, P. (Eds.) Semantic Web Technologies. Trends and Research in Ontology-based Sys-tems. John Wiley & Sons,...
  • DE ANDRÉS RIVERO, J.; HERNÁNDEZ MARÍN, R. “Cronolex: sistema para la representación de cuerpos lega-les”, (número sobre XML legislativo: representación...
  • DORIGO, M.; BIRATTORI, M.; BLUMAR, C.; GAMBARDELLA, L.M.; MONDADA, F.; STÜTZLE, T. (Eds.) “Ant Colony, Optimization and Swarm Intelligence”,...
  • DOYLE, J.; DEAN, T. “Strategic Directions in Artifi cial Intelligence”, ACM Computing Surveys vol. 28, n., 1996, pp. 653-670.
  • ENDESHAW, A. “Web Services and the Law: a Sketch of Potential Issues”, International Journal of Law and Informa-tion Technology 11, 2003,...
  • ENGLE, E. “Smoke and Mirrors or Science? Teaching Law with Computers —A Reply to Cass Sunstein on Artifi cial Inteligence and Legal Science”,...
  • FEIGENBAUM, E.A. “A Personal View of Experts Systems: Looking Back and Looking Ahead”, Knowledge System Laboratory, Report n. 92-41 KSL, Stanford,1992.
  • FELTOVITCH, P.J.; BRADSHAW, J.M.; JEFFERS, R.; SURI, N.; USZOK, A. “Social Order and Adaptability in Animal and Human Cultures as Analogues...
  • FETERIS, E. “A Survey of 25 Years of Reserach on Legal Argumentation”, Argumentation, n. 11, 1997, pàgs 355-376.
  • FETERIS, E.; PRAKKEN, H. Introduction: Dialectical legal Argument: Formal and informal models, “Artifi cial Intelli-gence and Law”, n.8, pp....
  • FORSYTH, D. E.; BUCHANAN, B., “Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems: Some Pitfalls and Suggestions”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man,...
  • FRENCH, R.M. “The Turing Test: the fi rst 50 years”, Trends in Cognitive Siences, vol.4, n. 3. pp. 115-122.
  • GALINDO, F.; ROVER, J. Derecho, gobernanza y tecnologías de la información en la sociedad del conocimiento, Series LEFIS, n.7, Universidad...
  • GARCÍA CAMINO, A.; Rodríguez Aguilar, J.A.; Sierra, C.; Vasconcelos, W. “A Rule-based Approach to Norm-Oriented Programming of Electronic...
  • GARCÍA CAMINO, A.; NORIEGA, P.; RODRÍGUEZ AGUILAR, J.A. “Implementing Norms in Electronic Insti-tutions”, International Conference on Autonomous...
  • GARDNER A. L. An Artifi cial Intelligence Approach to Legal Reasoning. Bradford Books/MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987.
  • GILBERT, N.; CONTE, R. (eds.). Artifi cial Societies. The Computer Simulation of Social Life. Routledge, London and New York, 1995.
  • GOLDIN, D.; WEGNER, P. “The Interactive Nature of Computing: Refuting the Strong Church-Turing Thesis”, Minds & Machines, vol. 18, 2008,...
  • GONZÁLEZ TABLAS, R. La informática jurídica: una aproximación experimental desde la filosofía del derecho, Universidad de Sevilla, 1987.
  • GRUBER, T. “A Translation Approach to portable ontologies”, Knowledge Acquisition, vol. 5, n. 2, 1993, pp. 199-220.
  • HAGE, J. Studies in Legal Logic, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005.
  • HENDLER, J.; FEIGENBAUM, E.A. “Knowledge is Power: The Semantic web Vision”, N. Zhong et al. (Eds.) WI 2001, LNAI, 2198, Springer Verlag,...
  • HITCHCOCK, D., VERHEIG, B. “ The Toulmin Model Today: Introduction to the special issue on Contemporary Work using Stephen Edelston Toulmin’s...
  • HUNTER, D. “Out of their minds: Legal theory in neural networks”, Artifi cial Intelligence and Law 7, 1999, pp. 129-151.
  • KOWALSKI, R. A. “The Early years of Logic Programming”, Communications of the ACM, 31, n. 1, 1988, pp. 38-43.
  • LEE, J.A.N. “History in the Computer Science Curriculum”, SIGCSE Bulletin 28, n. 2, 1996, pp. 15-20.
  • LEE, J.A.N. “History in the Computer Science Curriculum”, SIGCSE Bulletin 29, n. 2, 1997, pp. 12-13.
  • LODDER, A.R. DiaLaw. On Legal Justifi caction and Dialogical Models of Argumentation, Kluwer A.P., Amsterdam, 1999.
  • LODDER, A.R.; ZELEZNIKOW, J. “Developing an On-line Dispute Environment: Dialogue Tools and Negotiation Systems in a Th ree Step Model”, The...
  • LOZARES, C. (Ed.) Interacción, redes socials y ciencias cognitivas, Ed. Comares, Granada, 2007.
  • McCARTHY, J. et al. AI@50, The AI Dartmouth Conference: The Next Fifty Years, 2006, McCarty, L. T. On the Role of Prototypes in Appellate...
  • McCARTHY, J. “Generality in Artifi cial Intelligence”, Turing Award Lecture, Communications of the ACM, vol. 30, n.12, 1987, pp. 1030-1035.
  • McCARTHY, J. “John Searle’s Chinese Room Argument” http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/chinese.html, 2006.
  • McCARTHY, J. “LISP. Notes on its Past and Future”, Conference Record of the 1980 {LISP} Conference, ACM, Stanford University, 1980, pp. v-viii.
  • McCARTHY, J.; MINSKY, M.L.; ROCHESTER, N.; SHANNON, C.E. “A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project in Artificial Intelligence”,...
  • McCARTHY, J. “History of LISP”, ACM SIGPLAN Notices, vol. 13, n.8, 1978, pp. 217-223.
  • McFARLAND, T. BÖSSER. Intelligent Behavior in Animals and Robots, Bradford Book, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1993.
  • MILLER, G. A. “The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective”, TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 7, n. 3, March 2003, pp. 141-144.
  • MINSKY, M. “A Framework for Representing Knowledge”, MIT-AI Laboratory Memo 306, June, 1974. Reprinted in P. Winston (ed.) The Psychology...
  • MUNTJEWERFF, A.J.; GROOTHUISMINK, J. “PROSA. A computer Program as Instructional Environment for Supporting the Learning of Legal Case Solving”,...
  • NORIEGA, P. “Regulating virtual interactions”, en P. Casanovas, P. Noriega, D. Bourcier, F. Galindo (Eds.), Trends in Legal Knowledge: the...
  • NORIEGA, P. Agent-Mediated Auctions: The Fishmarket Metaphor. Ph.D. thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 1997, IIIA monography...
  • NORMAN, T.J.; CARBOGIM, D.; KRABBE, E.C.B.; WALTON, D. “Argument and Multi-Agent Systems”, en C. Reed y T.J. Norman (eds.), Argumentation...
  • OSKAMP, A.; WALKER, R.F.; SCHRIKS, J.A.; VAN DEN BERG, P.H. “PROLEXS, DIVIDE and RULE: a legal application”, ICAIL-89, ACM, 1989, pp. 54-62.
  • PALMIRANI, M. “Model Regularity of Legal Language in Active Modifi cations”, en P. Casanovas et al. (Eds.) AI Approaches to the Complexity...
  • PÉREZ-LUÑO, E. Problemas actuales de la documentación y la informática jurídica, Tecnos, Madrid, 1987.
  • PERUGINELLI, G.; RAGONA, M. (Eds.) Law via the Internet Free Access, Quality of Information, Eff ectiveness of Rights, EPAP, Florence, 2009.
  • PFEIFER, R.; ILIDA, F. “Embodied Artifi cial Intelligence: Trends and Challenges”, in F.Ilida et al., Embodied Artifi cial Intelligence, LNAI...
  • PINAR, A.S.; CICECLI, I.; AKMAN, V. “Turing Test: 50 years later”, Minds and Machines, vol. 10, pp.463-518, 2000.
  • POBLET, M.; CASANOVAS, P.; LÓPEZ-COBO, J.M.; CABRERIZO, A.; PRIETO, J.A. ““Mediation, ODR, and the Web 2.0: A Case for Relational Justice”,...
  • POLLOCK, J.L. “Defeasible reasoning”, Cognitive Science, n. 11, pp. 1987, 481-518.
  • POLLOCK, J.L. “Justification and Defeat”, Artifi cial Intelligence, n. 67, 1994, pp. 377-407.
  • POLLOCK, J.L. Cognitive Carpentry. A Blueprint for How to Build a Person. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1995.
  • PRAKKEN, H. AI & Law, “Logic and Argument Schemes”, Argumentation 19, 2005, pp. 303-320.
  • PRAKKEN, H. Logical Tools for Modelling Legal argument. A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law, Kluwer A.P., Amsterdam, 1997.
  • REED, C.; NORMAN, T.J. “A Roadmap of Research in Argument and Computation”, Argumentation Machines: New Frontiers in Argument and Computation,...
  • RISSLAND, E.; Ashley, K.; Loui, R.P. “AI and Law: A fruitful synergy”, Artifi cial Intelligence 150, 2003, pp. 1-15.
  • RISSLAND, E.L, ASHLEY K. D. “A Case-Based System for Trade Secrets Law”. Proc. 1st Intl. Conf. on Artifi cial Inte-lligence and Law, 61-67....
  • RISSLAND. E. “Artifi cial Intelligence and Law: Stepping Stones to a Model of Legal Reasoning”, Yale Law Journal,vol. 99, 1999, pp. 1957-1981.
  • ROCO, M.C., BAINBRIDGE, W.S. Converging technologies for Improving Human Performance. Nanotechnology, Biote-chnology, Information technology...
  • ROSE, D.E.; BELEW, R.K. “Legal Information Retrieval: A Hybrid Approach”, in Proceedings of the Second Internatio-nal Association on Artifi...
  • SÁNCHEZ-MAZAS, M. Obras Escogidas. Vol. II. Lógica, Informática y Derecho. Universidad del País Vasco, Donostia, San Sebastián, 2003.
  • SARTOR, G. “Fundamental legal concepts: a formal and teleological characterisation”, Artificial Intelligence and Law14, 2006, pp. 101-142.
  • SARTOR, G. Corso de informatica giuridica. Vol. 1. L’informatica giuridica e le Technologies dell’informazione, G. Giappichelli Ed., Torino,...
  • SARTOR, G. Intelligenza artificiale e diritto. Un’introduzione. A. Giuffrè Ed., Milano, 1996.
  • SARTOR, G. Le applicazioni giuridiche dell’intelligenza artificiale, A. Giuf rè Ed., Milano, 1990.
  • SARTOR, G. Legal Reasoning. A Cognitive Approach to the Law. Treatise. Vol. V. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005.
  • SCHUMACHER, M.; OSSOWSKI, S. “The Governing Environment”, en D. Weyns, H. Van Dyke Parunak, and F. Michel (Eds.), E4MAS 2005, LNAI 3830, Springer-Verlag...
  • SEARLE, J.R. “Minds, Brains and Programs”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 1980: 417-457.SEARLE, J.R. The Construction of Social Reality....
  • SERGOT, M.J.; SADRI, F.; KOWALSKI, R.A.; KRIWACZEK, F.; HAMMOND, P.; CORY, H.T. “The British Na-tionality Act as a Logic Program”. Communications...
  • SHABOLT, N.; HALL, W.; BERNERS-LEE, T. (2006). “The Semantic Web Revisited”. IEEE Intelligent Systems. May/June: 96-101.
  • SIERRA, C; NORIEGA, P. “Towards layered dialogical agents”, Intelligent Agents III Agent Th eories, Architectures, and LanguagesECAI’96 Workshop...
  • SIMON, H.A. The Sciences of the Artifi cial (1996). The MIT Press. Spanish version by P. Noriega, Las ciencias de lo artifi cial, Ed. Comares,...
  • SIMON, H.A.; EINSESTADT, S.A. “A Chinese Room that Understands”, en J. Preston, M. Bishop, Views into the Chinese room: New essays on Searle...
  • SLALAK D B, RISSLAND E. L. “Argument moves in a rule-guided domain”. Proc. 3rd Intl. Conf. on Artifi cial Intelli-gence and Law, 1-11. ACM...
  • SLOMAN, A. (2005) “AI in a New Millenium: Obstacles & Opportunities”, http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/axs [23/10/2006]SUSSKIND, R.S. Expert Systems...
  • TAUBERER, Y. “What is RDF”, XML.com, http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2001/01/24/rdf.html,2001.
  • THAGARD, P. Conceptual Revolutions, Princeton University Press, 1992.
  • VALENTE, A. “Types and Roles of legal Ontologies”, in V.R. Benjamins, P. Casanovas, J. Breuker, A. Gangemi, Law and the Semantic Web LNAI...
  • WALTON, D. The New Dialectic. Conversational Context of Argument, The University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1995.
  • WALTON, D. “The Place of Dialogue in Logic Computer Science, and Communication Studies”, Synthese 123, 2000, pp.pp.327-346.
  • WARREN, P.; STUDER, R.; DAVIES, J. “Introduction“, in Davies et al. Semantic Web Technologies,Wiley & Sons Chichester, 2006, pp. 1-8.
  • WEGNER, P.; EBERBACH, E. “New models of computation”, The Computer Journal, vol. 47, n. 1, 2004, pp. 4-9.
  • WILKES, M.V. “Artifi cial Intelligence as the Year 2000 Approaches”, Communications of the ACM, vol 35, n. 8, 1992, pp. 17-20.
  • WINOGRAD, T. “From Computing Machinery to Interaction Design”, in P. Denning, R. Metcalfe (eds.) Beyond Cal-culation: The Next Fifty Years...
  • YAO, X. “Evolutionary computation comes of age”, Journal of Cognitive Systems Research 1, 1999, pp. 59-64.
  • ZELEZNIKOW, J.; BELLUCCI, E. Family-Winner: Integrating Game Theory and Heuristics to Provide Negotiation Support, Proceedings of the Sixteenth...