Explicando la despropocionalidad en América Latina: magnitud de distrito, malapportionment y fragmentación partidaria

• Autores: Kenneth Bunker, Patricio Navia
• Localización: Revista española de ciencia política, ISSN 1575-6548, Nº 23, 2010, págs. 81-110
• Idioma: español
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Explaining disproporcionality in Latin America: district magnitude, malapportionment and party fragmentation
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Dialnet Métricas: 2 Citas
• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Altman, D. y Pérez-Liñán, A. 2002. “Assessing the Quality of Democracy: Freedom, Competitiveness, and Participation in 18 Latin American Countries”,...
  • Álvarez, M.; Cheibub, J. A.; Limongi, F. y Przeworski, A. 1996. “Classifying Political Regimes”, Studies in Comparative International Development...
  • Amorim N. y Cox, G. 1997. “Electoral institutions, cleavage structures and the number of parties”, American Journal of Political Science 41(1):...
  • Baldez, L. 2007. “Primaries vs. quotas: Gender and candidate nominations in Mexico, 2003”, Latin American Politics and Society 49(3): 69-96.
  • Balinski, M. y Young, P. 1982. Fair representation: meeting the idea of one man, one vote. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Benoit, K. 2000. “Which Electoral Formula Is the Most Proportional? A New Look with New Evidence”, Political Analysis 8(4).
  • Blais, A. 2008. “¿Qué afecta a la participación electoral?”, Revista Española de Ciencia Política 18: 9-27.
  • Blondel, J. 1969. An Introduction to Comparative Government. Londres: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
  • Bowler, S.; Donovan, T. y Brockington, D. 2003. Electoral reform and minority representation. Columbus: The Ohio state University Press.
  • Bulmer-Thomas, V. 2003. The Economic History of Latin America since Independence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Carey, J. 1994. “Los efectos del ciclo electoral sobre el sistema de partidos y el respaldo parlamentario al Ejecutivo”, Estudios Públicos...
  • Cavadias, E. 2001. “El nuevo institucionalismo en América Latina”, Ciencias de Gobierno 5(10): 11-25.
  • Colomer, J. M. 2001. Instituciones políticas. Buenos Aires: Ariel.
  • Colomer, J. M. 2004. “Taming the Tiger: Voting Rights and Political Instability in Latin America”, Latin American Politics and Society 46.2...
  • Cox, G. 1987. “Electoral Equilibria Under Alternative Voting Institutions”, American Journal of Political Science 31: 82-108.
  • Cox, G. 1997. Making votes count. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dahl, R. A. 1971. Polyarchy. Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Dimaggio, P. y Powell, W. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Duverger, M. 1954. Los partidos políticos. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • Elster, J. 1988. Constitucionalismo y democracia. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • Feddersen, T.; Sened, I. y Wright, S. 1990. “Rational Voting and Candidate entry under pluralty rule”, American Journal of Political Science...
  • Gallagher, M. 1991. “Proportionality, Disproportionality and Electoral Systems”, Electoral Studies 10(1): 33-51.
  • Gallagher, M. 1992. “Comparing Proportional Representation Electoral Systems: Quotas, Thresholds, Paradoxes and Majorities”, British Journal...
  • Geys, B. 2006. “District magnitude, social heterogeneity and local party system fragmentation”, Party Politics 12(2): 281-297.
  • Hall, P. 1986. Governing the Economy, the Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hall, P. y Taylor, R. 1996. “Political Sciences and the Three New Institutionalisms”, MPIFG, Discussion Paper 96(6): 1-32.
  • Halperin D.; Glade, T.; Thorp, W.; Rosemary et al. 2002. Historia económica de América Latina desde la Independencia hasta nuestros días....
  • Huntington, S. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
  • Jones, M. 1995. Electoral Laws and the Survival of Presidential Democracies. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press.
  • Jones, M. 1999. “Electoral Laws and the Effective Number of Candidates in Presidential Elections”, Journal of Politics 61(1): 171-184.
  • Jones, M. y Navia, P. 1998. “Gender Quotas, Electoral Laws, and the Election of Women: Assessing the Effectiveness of Quotas in Open List...
  • Katz, R. 1994. Electoral Systems. Tallinn, Estonia.
  • Katzenstein, P. 1985. Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Laakso, M. y Taagepera, R. 1979. “Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with application to West Europe”, Comparative Political Studies 12:...
  • Larraín, H. Max. 2006. El efecto del tipo de sistema electoral en la participación electoral.
  • Lijphart, A. 1986. Degrees of Proportionality of Proportional Representation Formulas. Nueva York: Agathon Press.
  • Lijphart, A. 1990a. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in ThirtySix Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Lijphart, A. 1990b. “The political consequences of electoral laws: 1945-1985”, American Political Science Review 84: 481-496.
  • Lijphart, A. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of 27 Democracies, 1945- 1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lipset, S. y Rokkan, S. 1967. Cleavage structures, party systems and voter alignments: An introduction. Nueva York: Free Press.
  • Lipson, L. 1964. The democratic Civilization. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
  • Loosemore, J. y Hanby, V. 1971. “The Theoretical Limits of Maximum Distortion: Some Analytic Expressions for Electoral Systems”, British Journal...
  • Mackie, T. y Rose, R. 1982. The International Almanac of Electoral History. Londres: Macmillan.
  • Magar, E.; Rosenblum, R. y Samuels, D. 1998. “On the absence of centripetal incentives in double-member districts The case of Chile”, Comparative...
  • Mainwaring, S.; Brinks, D. y Pérez-Liñán, A. 2000. Classifying Political Regimes in Latin America 1945-1999. The Helen Kellogg Institute for...
  • March, J. y Olsen, J. 1984. “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life”, American Political Science Review 78(3):...
  • March, J. y Olsen, J. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. Nueva York: Free Press.
  • Monroe, B. L. 1994. “Disproportionality and Malapportionment: Measuring Electoral Inequity”, Electoral Studies 13: 132-149.
  • Nohlen, D. 1995. Sistemas electorales y partidos políticos. México DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • Ordeshook, P. y Shvetsova, O. 1994. “Ethnic Heterogeneity, District Magnitude, and the Number of Parties”, American Journal of Political Science...
  • O’Donnell, G. A. 1998. “Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies”, Journal of Democracy 3(9): 112-126.
  • Palfrey, T. 1984. “Spacial equilibrium with entry”, Review of Economic Studies 51: 139- 156.
  • Parra, J. F. 2005. “Liberalismo: nuevo institucionalismo y cambio político”, Política y Cultura 24: 31-61.
  • Payne, M.; Allamand, A.; Carrillo, F. y Zovatto, D. 2003. La política importa: democracia y desarrollo en América Latina. Nueva York: BID.
  • Pennisi, A. 1998. “Disproportionality Indexes and Robustness of Proportional Allocation Methods”, Electoral Studies 17(3-19).
  • Peters, G. 1999. Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism. Buenos Aires: Gedisa.
  • Przeworski, A.; Álvarez, M.; Cheibub, J. A. y Limongi, F. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Regimes and Material Well-being in the...
  • Rae, D. 1967. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Rae, D. 1995. “Using District Magnitude to regulate Political Party Completion”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(1): 65-75.
  • Remmer, K. 2008. “The Politics of Institutional Change Electoral Reform in Latin America, 1978-2002”, Party Politics 14: 1.
  • Reynoso, D. 2004a. “La sobre representación distrital en Sonora y Sinaloa, 1994-2004: sus efectos en perspectiva comparada”, Región y Sociedad...
  • Reynoso, D. 2004b. Votos ponderados: sistemas electorales y sobrerrepresentacion distrital. México DF: FLACSO.
  • Riker, W. 1976. “The number of political parties: A reexamination of Duverger’s Law”, Comparative Politics 9: 93-106.
  • Riker, W. 1982. “The Two-Party System and Duverger’s Law: An essay on the History of Political Science”, American Political Science Review...
  • Rose, R. y Urwin, D. 1970. “Persistence and change in western party systems since 1945”, Political Studies 18: 287-319.
  • Samuels, D. y Snyder, R. 2001. “The Value of a Vote: Malapportionment in Comparative Perspective”, British Journal of Political Science 31:...
  • Sartori, G. 1968. Political development and political engineering. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sartori, G. 1976. Parties and Political Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sartori, G. 1987. Partidos y sistemas de partidos. Madrid: Alianza.
  • Sartori, G. 1997. Comparative Constitutional Engineering. Nueva York, 2ª ed.
  • Scully, T. 1992. Los partidos de centro y la evolución política chilena. Notre Dame: CIEPLAN.
  • Shugart, M. S. y Carey, J. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies. Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Nueva York: Cambridge University...
  • Siavelis, P. 1997. “Continuity and change in the Chilean party system On the transformational effects of electoral reform”, Comparative Political...
  • Skocpol, T.; Rueschemeyer, D. y Evans, P. 1985. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Stokes, S. 1999. “Political Parties and Democracy”, Annual Review of Political Science 2: 243-267.
  • Taagepera, R. y Grofman, B. 2003. “Mapping the indices of seats-votes disproportionality and inter-election volatility”, Party Politics 9(6):...
  • Taagepera, R. y Shugart, M. S. 1989. Seats and Votes. The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Taagepera, R. y Shugart, M. S. 1993. “Predicting the Number of Parties: A Quantitative Model of Duverger’s Mechanical Effect”, American Political...
  • Tsebelis, G. 1995. “Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism”,...
  • Tsebelis, G. 2002. Veto Players How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Urdánoz Ganuza, J. 2007. “La teoría de los precios: una explicación sistemática para las fórmulas electorales proporcionales”, Revista Española...
  • Van Cott, D. L. 1994. Indigenous Peoples and Democracy in Latin America. Nueva York: St Martin’s Press.
  • Van Cott, D. L. 2003. “Indigenous struggle Latin American Research Review”, Latin American Research Review 38(2): 220-233.
  • Yashar, D. 2005. Contesting Citizenship in Latin America the Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge. Nueva York: Cambridge...