Un algoritmo para evaluar la influencia de la cultura política de los votantes en las decisiones de voto en España.

• Autores: María Dolores López, Javier Rodrigo, Sagrario Lantarón Sánchez
• Localización: Revista de estudios políticos, ISSN 0048-7694, Nº 144, 2009, págs. 195-210
• Idioma: español
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Abellanas, M.; Lillo, I.; Löpez, M.; Rodrigo, J. (2006): «Electoral strategies in a dynamical democratic system. Geometric models», European...
  • Aurenhammer, R.; Klein, R. (2000): «Voronoi Diagrams», en J.-R. Sack and Urrutia (editors), Handbook of Computational Geometry. Elsevier Science...
  • Black, D. (1958): The Theory of Committees and Elections, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Cahoon, L.; Hinich, M. (1976): A Method for Locating Targets Using Range Only, IEEE Trans. On Information Theory,. IT-22 (2): 217-225.
  • Cahoon, L.; Hinich, M. (1978): Odreshook, P.: «A statistical Multidimensional Scaling Method Based on The Spatial Theory of Voting», en Graphical...
  • CIS: Sociological Investigations Center of Spain. Opinion surveys. Study núm. 2615. Available online: http://www.cis.es.
  • Consolidated General Government Budget (1997-2006): Available online: http://www.igae.meh.es/Internet/Cln_Principal/ClnPresupuesto/PresupuestosGeneralesEst/PresupuestosGeneralesEstado/
  • Downs, A. (1957): An Economic Theory of democracy, Harper and Row, New York.
  • Eisets, H. A.; Laporte, G., Thisse, J. H. (1993): «Competitive Location Models: a Framework and Bibliography». Transportation Science 27:...
  • Enlow, J.; Hinich, M. (1982): «Ideology, Issues and the Spatial Theory of Elections », Americal Political Science Review, 76: 493-501.
  • Enlow, J.; Hinich, M. (1984): The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Ghobarah, H. (1998): «A Statistical Assessment of Spatial Model of ideology», Political Methodology Summer Meeting, San Diego.
  • Ghosh, A.; Harche, F. (1993): «Location-allocation Models in the Private Sector: Progress, Problems and Prospects», Location Science, 1: 81-106.
  • Hinich, M.; Pollard, W. (1981): «A new Approach to the spatial Theory of Electoral Competition», American Journal of Political Science, 25:...
  • Hinich, M.; Munger, M. (1994): Ideology and Theory of political Choice, The University of Michigan Press, Michigan.
  • Hinich, M. (2005): «A New Method for Statistical Multidimensional Unfolding», Communications in Stadistics-Theory and Method, 34: 2299-2310.
  • Lin, T.; Yun-Han, C.; Hinich, M. (1996): «Conflict Displacement and Regime Transition in Taiwan. A Spatial Analysis», Work Politics, 48: 453-81.
  • Lillo, I.; Löpez, M. D.; Rodrigo, J. (2007): «Competición política bipartidista. Estudio geométrico del equilibrio en un caso ponderado»,...
  • Löpez, M. D.; Rodrigo, J. (2008): «Generación del concepto de equilibrio en juegos de competición política», Documento de trabajo núm. 373/2008....
  • Okabe, A.; Boots, B.; Sugihara, K.; Chiu, S. (2000): Spatial Tessellations Concepts and Applications of Voronoi diagrams. John Wiley &...
  • Pappi, F.; Eckstain, G. (1998): «Voters' Party Preference in Multiparty Systems and Their Coalitions and Spatial Implications: Germany...
  • Preparata, F.; Shamos, M. (1985): Computational Geometry. An introduction. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Roemer, J. (2001): Political Competition, Harvard University Press, Boston.
  • Rusk, J.; Weisberg, H. (1972): «Perception of Presidential Candidates», Midwest Journal of Political Science, 16: 388-410.
  • Serra, D.; Revelle, C. (1994): «Market Capture by two Competitors: The preemptive location problem», Journal of Regional Science, 34: 549-561.
  • Shepsle, K.; Weingast, B. (1981): «Structure Inducted Equilibrium and Legislative Choice», Public Choice 37: 503-19.
  • Smid, M. (1997): «Closest point problems in Computational Geometry», en J.-R. Sack, J. Urrutia, Handbook on Computational Geometry. Elsevier...