A potential constitutional moment for the European rule of law: the importance of red lines
Armin von Bogdandy, Piotr Bogdanowicz, Iris Canor, Maciej Taborowski, Matthias Schmidt
págs. 983-995
Should we “harmonize” fundamental rights in the EU?: some reflections about minimum standards and fundamental rights protection in the EU composite constitutional system
Eleanor Spaventa
págs. 997-1023
Protection of the rule of law in the European Union through investment treaty arbitration: is judicial monopolism the right response to illiberal tendencies in Europe?
Wojciech Sadowski
págs. 1025-1060
The infringement procedure in the rule of law crisis: how to make effective use of Article 258 TFEU
Matthias Schmidt, Piotr Bogdanowicz
págs. 1061-1100
Implied exclusive powers in the ECJ’S post-Lisbon jurisprudence: the continued development of the ERTA doctrine
Merijn Chamon
págs. 1101-1141
Teaching fairness to artificial intelligence: existing and novel strategies against algorithmic discrimination under EU law
Philipp Hacker
págs. 1143-1185
Judicial review of harmonized standards: changing the paradigms of legality and legitimacy of private rulemaking under EU law
Carlo Tovo
págs. 1187-1216
The fine line between procedural and substantive review in cases involving complex technical-scientific evaluations: Bilbaína: Case C-691/15 P, European Commission v. Bilbaína de Alquitranes SA and Others, Judgment of the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) of 22 November 2017, EU:C:2017:882
Giulia Claudia Leonelli
págs. 1217-1249
The EU’s liability owing to the conduct of the European Ombudsman revisited: European Ombudsman v. Staelen: Case C-337/15 P, European Ombudsman v. Claire Staelen, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 April 2017, EU:C:2017:256
Nikos Vogiatzis
págs. 1251-1273