SENTENCING: LEARNING FROM, AND WORRYING ABOUT, THE STATES
págs. 933-942
LESSONS OF A SENTENCING REFORMER FROM THE DEEP SOUTH
págs. 943-958
PANEL ONE: PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION AND ITS CHALLENGES
págs. 959-1009
SENTENCING COMMISSIONS AS PROVOCATEURS OF PROSECUTORIAL SELF-REGULATION
págs. 1010-1047
PANEL TWO: CONSIDERATIONS AT SENTENCING--WHAT FACTORS ARE RELEVANT AND WHO SHOULD DECIDE?
págs. 1048-1081
THE NEW SENTENCING CONUNDRUM: POLICY AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AT CROSS-PURPOSES
págs. 1082-1123
SENTENCING DECISIONS: MATCHING THE DECISIONMAKER TO THE DECISION NATURE
págs. 1124-1161
PANEL THREE: THEORIES AND POLICIES UNDERLYING GUIDELINES SYSTEMS
págs. 1162-1189
STATE SENTENCING GUIDELINES: DIVERSITY, CONSENSUS, AND UNRESOLVED POLICY ISSUES
págs. 1190-1232
OBSOLESCENCE AND IMMANENCE IN PENAL THEORY AND POLICY
págs. 1233-1275
PANEL FOUR: THE INSTITUTIONAL CONCERNS INHERENT IN SENTENCING REGIMES
págs. 1276-1314
THE FAILURE OF THE FEDERAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES: A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
págs. 1315-1350
A MAP OF SENTENCING AND A COMPASS FOR JUDGES: SENTENCING INFORMATION SYSTEMS, TRANSPARENCY, AND THE NEXT GENERATION OF REFORM
págs. 1351-1395
THE UNEXAMINED DEATH PENALTY: CAPITAL PUNISHMENT AND REFORM OF THE MODEL PENAL CODE
págs. 1396-1416
© 2024 INAP - Todos los derechos reservados