«Nosotras» y L’Oréal: Razones para divulgar sobre científicas españolas

• Gómez Rodríguez, Isabel María ^[1]
  1. [1] Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas

     Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas

     Madrid, España

     
• Localización: CTS: Revista iberoamericana de ciencia, tecnología y sociedad, ISSN-e 1850-0013, ISSN 1668-0030, Vol. 19, Nº. 56, 2024, págs. 141-156
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.52712/issn.1850-0013-546
• Títulos paralelos:
  • «Nós» e L'Oréal: Razões para divulgar as mulheres cientistas espanholas
  • L'Oréal and «Us»: Reasons to Communicate about Spanish Female Scientists
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen
  • español

    El objetivo de este artículo es analizar la iniciativa de divulgación detrás del libro Nosotras, Biocientíficas españolas. Publicado por L’Oréal (2002) con motivo de la concesión del premio L’Oréal-UNESCO For Women in Science a Margarita Salas, este libro recopila los testimonios de cientos de mujeres dedicadas a la investigación de las ciencias de la vida en España y da cuenta de la confluencia de intereses y valores presentes en la comunicación sobre mujeres científicas en una sociedad tecnocientífica. A partir de un análisis de la publicación de L'Oréal, este artículo propone una metodología cualitativa y plantea reflexiones sobre qué hace feminista a la comunicación social de la ciencia.

  • English

    This article aims to analyze the scientific communication initiative Nosotras, Biocientíficas españolas. Published by L'Oréal (2002) after Margarita Salas won the L'Oréal-UNESCO For Women in Science Prize, this book compiles the testimonies of hundreds of women dedicated to life sciences research in Spain and accounts for the confluence, interests and values present in the communication of science within a techno-scientific society. Based on an analysis of the L'Oréal publication, this article proposes a qualitative methodology and reflects on what makes science communication feminist.

  • português

    O objetivo deste artigo é analisar a iniciativa de divulgação que tornou possível o livro Nosotras, Biocientíficas españolas. Publicado pela L'Oréal (2002) por ocasião da atribuição do prémio L'Oréal-UNESCO For Women in Science a Margarita Salas, este livro reúne os testemunhos de centenas de mulheres dedicadas à investigação em ciências da vida em Espanha. O livro dá conta da confluência, dos interesses e dos valores presentes na comunicação da ciência numa sociedade tecnocientífica. A publicação mostra a confluência de interesses e valores presentes na comunicação sobre as mulheres cientistas numa sociedade tecnocientífica. Este artigo propõe uma metodologia qualitativa e suscita reflexões sobre o que torna a comunicação social da ciência feminista.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Abir-Am, P. & Outram, D. (1987). Uneasy Careers and Intimate Lives: Women in Science, 1789-1979. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
  • Altheide, D. (1987). Ethnographic Content Analysis. Qualitative Sociology, 10, 65-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988269.
  • Altheide, D. (2000). Tracking discourse and qualitative document analysis. Poetics, 27(4), 287-299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(00)00005-X.
  • Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas (2016). International Day of Women and Girls in Science: resolution 70/212 adopted by the General...
  • Asdal, K. & Reinertsen, H. (2021). Doing Document Analysis: A Practice-Oriented Method. Londres: SAGE.
  • Baden, D. & Harwood, I. A. (2013). Terminology Matters: A Critical Exploration of Corporate Social Responsibility Terms. Journal of Business...
  • Blackmore, J. (2014). ‘Wasting talent’? Gender and the problematics of academic disenchantment and disengagement with leadership. Higher Education...
  • Chimba, M. & Kitzinger, J. (2010). Bimbo or boffin? Women in science: an analysis of media representations and how female scientists negotiate...
  • Flicker, E. (2003). Between Brains and Breasts—Women Scientists in Fiction Film: On the Marginalization and Sexualization of Scientific Competence....
  • FECYT (2007). Mujer y ciencia. La situación de las mujeres investigadoras en el sistema español de ciencia y tecnología. Segunda edición actualizada....
  • González, D., Mateu, A., Pons, E. & Domínguez, M. (2017). Women Scientists as Decor: The Image of Scientists in Spanish Press Pictures....
  • González García, M. I. & Pérez Sedeño, E. (2002). Ciencia, Tecnología y Género. CTS+I: Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología,...
  • González-Pérez, S., Mateos de Cabo, R. & Sáinz, M. (2020). Girls in STEM: Is It a Female Role-Model Thing? Frontiers in Psychology, 11,...
  • Harding, S. (1996). Ciencia y feminismo. Madrid: Ediciones Morata.
  • Herrmann, S. D., Adelman, R. M., Bodford, J. E., Graudejus, O., Okun, M. A. & Kwan, V. S. Y. (2016). The Effects of a Female Role Model...
  • Karppinen, K. & Moe, H. (2011). What we talk about when we talk about document analysis. En M. Puppis & N. Fust (Eds.), Trends in...
  • Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Glynn, C. J. & Huge, M. (2013). The Matilda Effect in Science Communication: An Experiment on Gender Bias in...
  • Lewenstein, B. (2019). The need for feminist approaches to science communication. Journal of Science Communication, 18(4), C01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18040301.
  • L’Oréal (2023). Cinco científicas españolas reciben el premio de L’Oréal-Unesco ‘For Women in Science’. L’Oréal. Recuperado de: https://www.loreal.com/es-es/espana/news/commitment/for-women-in-science-loreal-unesco-2023/.
  • L’Oréal For Women in Science (2002). Nosotras, biocientíficas españolas. Madrid: L’Oreal.
  • Magallón Portolés, C. (1996). ¿Extrañas en el paraíso? Mujeres en las ciencias físico-químicas en la España a principios del siglo XX. En...
  • Miller, F. A. & Alvarado, K. (2005). Incorporating Documents Into Qualitative Nursing Research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 37(4),...
  • Olsson, M. & Martiny, S. E. (2018). Does Exposure to Counterstereotypical Role Models Influence Girls’ and Women’s Gender Stereotypes...
  • Owen, G. (2014). Qualitative Methods in Higher Education Policy Analysis: Using Interviews and Document Analysis. The Qualitative Report,...
  • Perez-Bustos, T. (2019). Questioning the feminization in science communication. Journal of Science Communication, 18(4), C04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18040304.
  • Polino, C. & Castelfranchi, Y. (2012). The ‘Communicative Turn’ in Contemporary Techno-science: Latin American Approaches and Global Tendencies....
  • Rodríguez, E. (2021). #NoMoreMatildas, la campaña que señala el machismo del mundo científico. Agencia SINC, 10 de febrero. Recuperado de:...
  • Rossiter, M. W. (1982). Women Scientists in America: Struggles and Strategies to 1940. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Rossiter, M. W. (1993). The Matilda Effect in Science. Social Studies of Science, 23(2), 325-341.
  • Salminen, A., Kauppinen, K. & Lehtovaara, M. (1997). Towards a methodology for document analysis. Journal of the American Society for...
  • Sankofa, N. (2022). Critical method of document analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 0(0), 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2022.2113664.
  • Santesmases, M. J. (2014). Gender in Research and Industry: Women in Antibiotic Factories in 1950s Spain. En T. Ortiz-Gómez & M. J. Santesmases...
  • Schiebinger, L. (2001). Has Feminism Changed Science? Cambridge, Massachusetts & London: Harvard University Press.
  • Shapin, S. (1994). Invisible Technicians: Masters, Servants, and the Making of Experimental Knowledge. En S. Shapin (Ed.), A Social History...
  • Von Oertzen, C., Rentetzi, M. & Watkins, E. (2013). Finding Science in Surprising Places: Gender and the Geography of Scientific Knowledge....
  • Vredenburg, J., Kapitan, S., Spry, A. & Kemper, J. A. (2020). Brands Taking a Stand: Authentic Brand Activism or Woke Washing? Journal...
  • Wach, E. & Ward, R. (2013). Learning about Qualitative Document Analysis. IDS Practice Paper In Brief, 13, 1-9.