La personalización del acceso a los servicios de cuidados de larga duración en el Reino Unido: apoyos autodirigidos, presupuestos personales y pagos directos

• Sara Peña Valderrama ^[1] ; Joseba Zalakain ^[1]
  1. [1] SIIS Servicio de Información e Investigación Social, Fundación Eguía-Careaga
• Localización: Zerbitzuan: Gizarte zerbitzuetarako aldizkaria = Revista de servicios sociales, ISSN 1134-7147, Nº. 82, 2024, págs. 9-33
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.5569/1134-7147.82.01
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Dialnet Métricas: 1 Cita
• Resumen
  • español

    Este artículo describe y analiza el modelo británico de acceso personalizado a los servicios de cuidados para personas con dependencia o discapacidad. En las últimas décadas, se han ensayado en el territorio una serie de fórmulas y herramientas destinadas a que las personas usuarias de servicios públicos de cuidados puedan elegir y contratar los apoyos requeridos de manera autónoma, según sus deseos y necesidades. Surgen así los apoyos autodirigidos, los presupuestos personales y los pagos directos. Este artículo describe, en primer lugar, las características básicas y el funcionamiento de estas herramientas, tal y como han sido desplegadas en las cuatro naciones del Reino Unido. En segundo lugar, y a partir de una revisión de la evidencia disponible, se esbozan una serie de aprendizajes acerca de la efectividad e impacto de estas fórmulas tras su introducción en el sistema de cuidados de larga duración británico.

  • euskara

    Artikulu honek mendekotasuna edo ezgaitasuna duten pertsonentzako zainketa-zerbitzuetara sarbide pertsonalizatua izateko eredu britainiarra deskribatu eta aztertzen du. Azken hamarkadetan, zenbait formula eta tresna entseatu dira lurraldean, zainketa-zerbitzu publikoen erabiltzaileek haien kabuz hautatu eta kontratatu ahal izan ditzaten eskatutako laguntzak, haien nahien eta beharren araberakoa dena. Horrela, autobideratutako laguntzak, aurrekontu pertsonalak eta zuzeneko ordainketak sortzen dira. Artikulu honek, lehenik eta behin, tresna horien oinarrizko ezaugarriak eta funtzionamendua deskribatzen ditu, Erresuma Batuko lau nazioetan zabaldu diren bezala. Bigarrenik, eta eskura dagoen ebidentzia berrikusita, formula horien eraginkortasunari eta inpaktuari buruzko hainbat ikaskuntza zirriborratu dira, iraupen luzeko zainketa-sistema britainiarrean sartu ondoren

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • ANIMATE (2014): Individual service funds: learning from inclusion’s 18 years of practice, s.l., The Centre for Welfare Reform.
  • AUDIT WALES (2022): Direct Payments for adult social care. Report of the Auditor General for Wales, Cardiff, Auditor General for Wales.
  • BAXTER, K. (2018): “The personalization and marketization of home care services for older people in England”, en CHRISTENSEN, K. y PILLING,...
  • CAREY, G.; CRAMMOND, B. y MALBON, E. (2019): “Personalisation schemes in social care and inequality: review of the evidence and early theorising”,...
  • CARR, S. (2010): Enabling risk, ensuring safety: selfdirected support and personal budgets, Social Care Institute for Excellence.
  • CLOSE, L. (2022): How are we doing with Option Two/ Individual Service Funds, s.l., In Control Scotland.
  • COMAS D’ARGEMIR, D.; SANCHO, M. y ZALAKAIN, J. (2023): “Hacia la personalización de los cuidados y los apoyos en el marco del sistema de atención...
  • DAVEY, V. (2012): “Impacto de la prestación económica personal sobre la interacción entre los servicios formales de cuidados y los cuidados...
  • DAVEY, V. (2018): “Social care for older people: the role and function of direct payments” [tesis doctoral], London School of Economics and...
  • DAVEY, V. (2021): “Influences of service characteristics and older people’s attributes on outcomes from direct payments”, BMC Geriatrics,...
  • DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE (2014): Care and support statutory guidance, s.l., Government Digital Service.
  • DUFFY, S. (2021): Hoja de ruta europea para una financiación centrada en el usuario de los servicios de atención y apoyo de larga duración,...
  • FERGUSON, I. (2007): “Increasing user choice or privatizing risk? The antinomies of personalization”, British Journal of Social Work, vol....
  • FITZGERALD MURPHY, M. y KELLY, C. (2019): “Questioning ‘choice’: a multinational metasynthesis of research on directly funded home-care programs...
  • FLEMING, P. et al. (2019): “Individualized funding interventions to improve health and social care outcomes for people with a disability:...
  • GLENDINNING, C. et al. (2008): Evaluation of the Individual Budgets Pilot Programme. Final report, York, University of York.
  • GLENDINNING, C. et al. (2013): “El equilibrio que importa es el que debe darse entre el coste y la calidad del cuidado’” [entrevista], Gizarteratuz,...
  • HAMILTON, S. et al. (2017): “The role of family carers in the useof personal budgets by people with mental health problems”, Health and Social...
  • HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE ALLIANCE SCOTLAND y SELF DIRECTED SUPPORT SCOTLAND (2020): My Support My Choice — People’s experiences of self-directed...
  • HYSLOP, J. et al. (2020): “How do peer networks support people with personal budgets? A review of the research evidence from the United Kingdom”,...
  • JONES, K. et al. (2014): “Can individual budgets have an impact on carers and the caring role?”, Ageing and Society, vol. 34, n.o 1, págs....
  • KING’S COLLEGE (2014): Risk, safeguarding and personal budgets: exploring relationships and identifying good practice, Londres, King’s College.
  • LARKIN, M. (2015): “Developing the knowledge base about carers and personalisation: contributions made by an exploration of carers’ perspectives...
  • MACDONALD, F. (2021): Individualising risk: paid care work in the new gig economy, Singapur, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • MCGUIGAN, K. et al. (2016): “The impact of Direct Payments on service users requiring care and support at home”, Practice, vol. 28, n.o 1,...
  • MANJI, K. (2018): “‘It was clear from the start that [SDS] was about a cost cutting agenda.’ Exploring disabled people’s early experiences...
  • MITCHELL, W.; BROOKS, J. y GLENDINNING, C. (2015): “Carers’ roles in personal budgets: tensions and dilemmas in front line practice”, British...
  • MORAN, N. et al. (2013): “Older people’s experiences of cashfor-care schemes: evidence from the English Individual Budget pilot projects”,...
  • MORROW, F. y KETTLE, M. (2021): Self-directed support: ten years on, Bristol, Bristol University Press.
  • NAO (2016): Personalised commissioning in adult social care, Londres, National Audit Office.
  • NAO (2021): The adult social care market in England, Londres, National Audit Office.
  • NEALE, J.; PARKMAN, T. y STRANG, J. (2019): “Challenges in delivering personalised support to people with multiple and complex needs: qualitative...
  • NEEDHAM, C. (2014): “Personalization: from day centres to community hubs?”, Critical Social Policy, vol- 34, n.o 1, págs. 90-108.
  • NEEDHAM, C. y CARR, S. (2015): “Micro-provision of social care support for marginalized communities. Filling the gap or building bridges to...
  • NETTEN, A., et al. (2012): “Personalisation through Individual Budgets: does it work and for whom?”, The British Journal of Social Work, vol....
  • O’ROURKE, G. (2016): “Older people, personalisation and self: an alternative to the consumerist paradigm in social care”, Ageing and Society,...
  • PEARSON, C. y RIDLEY, J. (2017): “Is personalization the right plan at the wrong time? Re-thinking cash-forcare in an age of austerity”, Social...
  • PEARSON, C.; WATSON, N. y MANJI, K. (2018): “Changing the culture of social care in Scotland: has a shift to personalization brought about...
  • RABIEE, P.; BAXTER, K. y GLENDINNING, C. (2016): “Supporting choice: support planning, older people and managed personal budgets”, Journal...
  • RODRIGUES, R. (2020): “Caring relationships and their role in users’ choices: a study of users of direct payments in England”, Ageing and...
  • RODRIGUES, R. y GLENDINNING, C. (2015): “Choice, competition and care — developments in English social care and the impacts on providers and...
  • SIIS CENTRO DE DOCUMENTACIÓN Y ESTUDIOS (2011): Prestaciones económicas y otras fórmulas de asignación económica individual en los sistemas...
  • SIIS SERVICIO DE INFORMACIÓN E INVESTIGACIÓN SOCIAL (2021): Guía para la personalización de los Servicios Sociales en Gipuzkoa. Elementos...
  • SKILLS FOR CARE (2023): Individual employers and the personal assistant workforce report, Leeds, Skills for Care.
  • SLASBERG, C. y BERESFORD, P. (2015): “Building on the original strengths of direct payments to create a better future for social care”, Disability...
  • SLASBERG, C.; BERESFORD, P. y SCHOFIELD, P. (2012): “Can personal budgets really deliver better outcome for all at no cost? Reviewing the...
  • TARRANT, A. (2022): “Devolution and the difficulty of divergence: the development of adult social care policy in Wales”, Critical Social Policy,...
  • THINK LOCAL ACT PERSONAL (2022): Better Direct Payments. From insight to action, Londres, Think Local Act Personal.
  • THINK LOCAL ACT PERSONAL; IN CONTROL y LANCASTER UNIVERSITY (2017): POET. Personal Outcomes Evaluation Tool for adults in receipt of social...
  • WATSON, C. (2021): Personalising commissioning: an overview of individual service funds in England, Institute of Public Care.
  • WOOLHAM, J. et al. (2017): “Do direct payments improve outcomes for older people who receive social care? Differences in outcome between people...
  • WOOLHAM, J. et al. (2018): “The impact of personal budgets on unpaid carers of older people”, Journal of Social Work, vol. 18, n.o 2, págs....
  • WOOLHAM, J. et al. (2019): “The employment conditions of social care personal assistants in England”, The Journal of Adult Protection, vol....