On reanalysis and actualization in syntatic change: the rise and development of english verbal gerunds

• Autores: Teresa Fanego
• Localización: Diachronica: International Journal for Historical Linguistics = Revue Internationale pour la Linguistique Historique = Internationale Zeitschrift für Historische Sprachwissenschaft, ISSN 0176-4225, Vol. 21, Nº 1, 2004, págs. 5-56
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.1075/dia.21.1.03fan
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Dialnet Métricas: 4 Citas
• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Abney, Stephen P. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in Its Sentential Aspect. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
  • Altenberg, Bengt. 1982. The Genitive v. The of-Construction. A study of syntactic variation in 17th century English. Lund: CWK Gleerup.
  • Andersen, Henning. 2001a. “Actualization and the (Uni)directionality of Change”. In Andersen 2001b, 225-248.
  • Andersen, Henning, ed. 2001b. Actualization: Linguistic change in progress. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Anderson, John. 1993. “Parameters of Syntactic Change: A notional view”. Historical Linguistics: Problems and perspectives ed. by Charles...
  • Blake, Norman, ed.1992. The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 2: 1066-1476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Blume, Rudolf. 1880. Überden Ursprungund die Entwickelung des Gerundiums im Englischen. Bremen: Frese. (Inaugural Dissertation, Universität...
  • Bosworth, Joseph & T.Northcote Toller. 1898. An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. 1921. Supplement by T. Northcote Toller. London: Oxford University...
  • Burnley, David. 1982. “Inflexion in Chaucer’s Adjectives”. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 83.169-177.
  • Burnley, David. 1992. “Lexis and Semantics”. In Blake 1992, 409-499.
  • Callaway, Morgan, Jr. 1929. “Concerning the Origin of the Gerund in English”. Studies in English Philology: A miscellany in honor of Frederick...
  • Campbell, Alistair. 1959. Old English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Campbell, Lyle. 2001a. “What’s Wrong with Grammaticalization?” In Campbell 2001b, 113-161.
  • Campbell, Lyle, ed. 2001b. Grammaticalization: A critical assessment. SpecialIssue of Language Sciences 23.
  • Croft, William. 2000. Explaining Language Change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow, Essex: Longman/Pearson.
  • Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Curme, George Oliver. 1912. “History of the English gerund”. Englische Studien 45.349-380.
  • Curme, George Oliver. 1931. A Grammar of the English Language, vol. 3: Syntax. Boston: Heath.
  • Dal, Ingerid. 1952. “Zur Entstehung des englischen Participium Praesentis auf -ing”. Norsk tidskriftfor sprogvidenskap 16.5-116.
  • Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. 1996. The French Influence on Middle English Morphology: A corpus-based study of derivation. Berlin & New York:...
  • Declerck, Renaat. 1991. A Comprehensive Descriptive Grammar of English. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
  • Denison, David. 1993. English Historical Syntax. London & New York: Longman.
  • Denison, David. 1998. “Syntax”. The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 2: 1776-1997ed. by Suzanne Romaine, 92-329. Cambridge:...
  • Disterheft, Dorothy. 1980. The Syntactic Development of the Infinitive in IE. Columbus, Ohio: Slavica.
  • Donner, Morton. 1986. “The Gerund in Middle English”. English Studies 67.394-400.
  • Einenkel, Eugen. 1913. “Zur Geschichte des englischen Gerundiums”. Anglia 37.382-392.
  • Einenkel, Eugen. 1914. “Die Entwickelung des englischen Gerundiums”. Anglia 38.1-76.
  • Elsness, Johan. 1981. “On the Syntactic and Semantic Functions of that-clauses”. Papers from the First Nordic Conference for English Studies...
  • Exposito Gonzalez, Ma de la Cruz. 1996. La estructura del sintagma nominal en el ingles de la cancillena: 1400-1450. Barcelona: Kadle Books.
  • Fanego, Teresa. 1996a. “The Development of Gerunds as Objects of Subject-control Verbs in English (1400-1760)”. Diachronica 13.29-62.
  • Fanego, Teresa. 1996b. “The Gerund in Early Modern English: Evidence from the Helsinki Corpus”. FoliaLinguisticaHistorica 17.97-152.
  • Fanego, Teresa. 1996c. “On the Historical Development of English Retrospective Verbs”. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 97.91-97.
  • Fanego, Teresa. 1998. “Developments in Argument linking in Early Modern English Gerund phrases”. English Language and Linguistics 2.87-119.
  • Fanego, Teresa. 2004. “Some Strategies for Coding Sentential Subjects in English: From exaptation to grammaticalization”. Studies in Language...
  • Fanego, Teresa. Forthcoming. Gerundial Complementation in English: Historical development and present-day usage.
  • Fischer, Olga. 1992. “Syntax”. In Blake 1992, 207-408.
  • Fischer, Olga. 1997. “Infinitive Marking in Late Middle English: Transitivity and changes in the English system of case”. In Fisiak 1997,...
  • Fisiak, Jacek, ed. 1997. Studies in Middle English Linguistics. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Gaaf, Willem van der. 1928. “The Gerund Preceded by the Common Case: A study in historical syntax”. English Studies 10.33-41, 65-72.
  • Harris, Alice C. 2003. “Cross-linguistic Perspectives on Syntactic Change”. In Joseph & Janda 2003, 529-551.
  • Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Haspelmath, Martin. 1998. “Does Grammaticalization Need Reanalysis?” Studies in Language 22.315-351.
  • Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. “Why is Grammaticalization Irreversible?” Linguistics 37.1043-1068. SpecialIssue on Functional Properties of Morphosyntactic...
  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2002. “On Directionality in Language Change, with particular reference to unidirectionality in grammaticalization”. Paper...
  • Heine, Bernd. 2003. “Grammaticalization”. In Joseph & Janda 2003, 575-601.
  • Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, & Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: The University of Chicago...
  • Hogg, Richard M., ed. 1992. The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 1: The Beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge University...
  • Hopper, Paul J. 1991. “On some Principles ofGrammaticization”. In Traugott & Heine 1991, 17-35.
  • Hopper, Paul J., & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003 [1993]. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Houston, Anne. 1989. “The English Gerund: Syntactic change and discourse fuction”. Language Change and Variation ed. by Ralph W. Fasold &...
  • Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jack, George B. 1988. “The Origins ofthe English Gerund”. NOWELE 12.15-75.
  • Jackendoff, RayS. 1977. X-bar Syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Jespersen, Otto. 1909-1949. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. 7 vols. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard. [Reprinted, London: George...
  • Joseph, Brian D. & Richard D. Janda, eds. 2003. The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Kastovsky, Dieter. 1985. “Deverbal Nouns in Old and Modern English: From stem-formation to word-formation”. Historical Semantics — Historical...
  • Kastovsky, Dieter. 1990. “Whatever Happened to the Ablaut Nouns in English — And why did it not happen in German?” Historical Linguistics...
  • Kastovsky, Dieter. 1992. “Semantics and Vocabulary”. In Hogg 1992, 290-408.
  • Kerkhof, J. 1982 [1966]. Studies in the Language of Geoffrey Chaucer. 2nd rev. ed. Leiden: E. J. Brill/Leiden University Press.
  • Kisbye, Torben. 1971-1972. An Historical Outline of English Syntax. Parts I & II. Aarhus: Akademisk Boghandel.
  • Koma, Osamu. 1987. “On the Initial Locus of Syntactic Change: Verbal gerund and its historical development”. English Linguistics 4.311-324.
  • Kortmann, Bernd. 1991. Free Adjuncts and Absolutes in English. Problems of control and interpretation. London & New York: Routledge.
  • Kruisinga, Etsko. 1930. “The verbal -ingin living English”. English Studies 12.58-66.
  • Kytö, Merja. 1996 [1991]. Manual to the Diachronic Part of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts: Coding conventions and lists of source texts....
  • Langacker, Ronald W. 1977. “Syntactic Reanalysis”. In Li 1977, 57-139.
  • Lass, Roger. 1992. “Phonology and morphology”. In Blake 1992, 23-155.
  • Lehmann, Christian. 1995 [1982]. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. München: Lincom Europa.
  • Li, Charles N., ed. 1977. Mechanisms of Syntactic Change. Austin & London: University of Texas Press.
  • Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 1991. “On the Gradualness of Grammaticalization”. In Traugott & Heine 1991, 37-80.
  • Lightfoot, David. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lightfoot, David. 1988. “Syntactic Change”. Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, vol. 1: Linguistic Theory: Foundations ed. by Frederick J....
  • Lightfoot, David. 1991. Howto Set Parameters: Arguments from language change. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Mair, Christian. 2002. “Three Changing Patterns ofVerb Complementation in Late Modern English: A real-time study based on matching text corpora”....
  • Marchand, Hans. 1969 [1960]. The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation. 2nd rev. ed. München: C. H. Beck.
  • Matsuda, Kenjiro. 1998. “On the Conservatism of Embedded Clauses”. Historical Linguistics 1997. Selected papers from the 13th International...
  • MED Kurath Hans, Sherman M. Kuhn et al., eds. 1952-2001. Middle English Dictionary. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Press.
  • Menard, P. 1973. Manuel dufrangais du moyen age: 1. Syntaxe de l’ancienfrangais. Bordeaux: Sobodi.
  • Miller, D. Gary. 2002. Nonfinite Structures in Theory and Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Millett, Bella, ed. 1982. Hali Meidenhad. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (The Early English Text Society.).
  • Minkova, Donka. 1991. The History of Final Vowels in English. The sound of muting. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Mitchell, Bruce. 1985. Old English Syntax. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Moessner, Lilo. 1997. “-ing-constructions in Middle English”. In Fisiak 1997, 335-349.
  • Mosse, Fernand. 1938. Histoire de la forme periphrastique ‘etre + participe present’ en germanique. II: Moyen-anglais et anglais moderne....
  • Mustanoja, Tauno F. 1960. A Middle English Syntax. Part I: Parts of speech. Helsinki: Societe Neophilologique.
  • Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1998. Language Form and Language Function. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Norde, Muriel. 2002. “The Final Stages ofGrammaticalization: Affixhood and beyond”. New Reflections on Grammaticalization ed. by Ilse Wischer...
  • Simpson, John A. & Edmund S. C. Weiner, eds. 1989. The Oxford English Dictionary on CD-ROM. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Pounder, Amanda. 2001. “Adverb-marking in German and English: System and standardization”. Diachronica 18.301-358.
  • Poutsma, Hendrik. 1923. The Infinitive, the Gerund and the Participles of the English Verb. Groningen: P. Noordhoff.
  • Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1991. “English Nominal Gerund Phrases as Noun Phrases with Verbphrase Heads”. Linguistics 29.763-799.
  • Riikonen, Eeva. 1935. “The gerundial constructions in Jane Austen’s novels”. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 36.212-224.
  • Schibsbye, Knud. 1977. Origin and Development of the English Language. III: Morphology and syntax. Kobenhavn: Nordisk Sprog- og Kulturforlag.
  • Smith, John Charles. 2001. “Markedness, Functionality, and Perseveration in the Actualization of a Morphosyntactic Change”. In Andersen 2001b,...
  • Söderlind, Johannes. 1958. Verb Syntax in John Drydens Prose, vol. 2. Uppsala: A.-B. Lundequist.
  • Strang, Barbara M.H. 1970. A History of English. London: Methuen.
  • Tabor, Whitney & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 1998. “Structural Scope Expansion and Grammaticalization”. The Limits ofGrammaticalization...
  • Tajima, Matsuji. 1985. The Syntactic Development of the Gerund in Middle English. Tokyo: Nan’un-do.
  • Tajima, Matsuji. 1996. “The Common-/objective-case Subject of the Gerund in Middle English”. NOWELE28/29.569-578.
  • Timberlake, Alan. 1977. “Reanalysis and Actualization in Syntactic Change”. In Li 1977, 141-177.
  • Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1992. “Syntax”. In Hogg 1992, 168-289.
  • Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. “Constructions in Grammaticalization”. In Joseph & Janda 2003, 624-647.
  • Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Bernd Heine, eds. 1991. Approaches to Grammaticalization. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Van Valin, Robert D. & Randy J. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Visser, Frederikus Theodorus. 1963-1973. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. 3 parts in 4 vols. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
  • Wik, Berit. 1973. English Nominalizations in -ing. Synchronic and diachronic aspects. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
  • Wurff, Wim van der. 1997. “Gerunds in the Modern English Period: Structure and change”. History of English (Seoul) 3.163-196. SpecialIssue...
  • Yoon, James Hye Suk. 1996. “Nominal Gerund Phrases in English as Phrasal Zero Derivations”. Linguistics 34.329-356.