Acceso usuarios
Nephele Papakonstantinou
This paper discusses the Roman legal treatment of poisoning, grounded on the lex Cornelia de sicariis et veneficis(81 BCE), through the lens of school forensic declamations (controversiae). Sections 1-4 set the context and address key methodolog-ical issues. Sec-tion 5, the core of the research, examines Pseudo-Quintilian’s Declama-tio minor 350 Aqua frigida privigno data(Cold water given to stepson) – a fictitious legal case concerning a suspicious death caused bydrinking cold water. It is argued that the medico-legal assumptions underlying this distinctly unique case are likely to have brought new content to the legal conceptualisation of the reckless administration of venena, and hence, to the juristic interpretation of the degree of criminal intent re-quired in similar cases of suspected homicide. The overall objective is to provide new insights of multidisciplinary relevance into the intersections of Roman Imperial foren-sic rhetoric, Roman law, and Graeco-Roman medicine, by looking closer at the meth-od of argument through which trials involving a charge of poisoning may have been conducted in actual court practice.
