Acceso usuarios
El objeto de este comentario es analizar la sentencia No. 3 de 11 de enero de 2017, la Sala Constitucional del Tribunal Supremo de Justicia mediante la cual, luego de declarar que la Asamblea Nacional estaba en situación de desacato de decisiones judiciales anteriores, que le impiden ejercer sus funciones, considerando nulas sus actuaciones, ordenó que el Mensaje anual del Presidente de la República se presentase ante la propia Sala Constitucional y no ante la Asamblea Nacional.
This purpose of these comments is to analyze the decision issued by the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Tribunal of Justice No. 3 of January 11 of 2017, in which it declared that all the National Assembly acts, being in situation of contempt regarding prior judicial decisions, are null and void, preventing it to exercise its functions; providing in consequence that the Annual Speech of the President was to be delivered before the Constitutional Chamber and not before the Assembly.
