An account of events, by definition, involves an understanding of the actors: a prova na arbitragem comercial internacional

• Autores: Paula Costa e Silva
• Localización: Quaestio facti. Revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio, ISSN-e 2604-6202, Nº. 6, 2024, págs. 49-75
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i6.22949
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • What could justify the paper on evidence in international commercial arbitration? What is so peculiar about this instance of the realisation of the law that it explains the autonomy of the subject of evidence when it takes place in international commercial arbitration? Isn’t the general theory of evidence applicable to the demonstration of reality in a certain type of proceedings—ar-bitral proceedings—whenever they concern commercial and plurilocalised disputes?These are the central questions around which the text will gravitate. We will emphasise what we believe to be the determining factor in the development of a praxis that does not cause a break between the general theory of evidence developed for civil cases tried in state courts and the central vectors of evidence as known in international commercial arbitration: the context of the exercise of jurisdiction

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Alchourrón, C. E. e Bulygin, E. (1971). Normative Systems. Springer Verlag.
  • Akinleye-Martins, O. (2022). Delocalization of international commercial arbitrations and the effect on arbitral awards. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/delocalization-international-commercial-arbitrations
  • Amaral, G. R. (2018). Burden of Proof and Adverse Inferences in International Arbitration: Proposal for an Inference Chart. Journal of International...
  • Aron, R. (1958). On Evidence and Inference in History. Daedalus, 87(4), pp. 11-39. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20026461.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3A2cdd0bb07e991df067642c20a5fc0696&ab_segments=&origin=&initiator=&acceptTC=1
  • Atría, F. (2019). Sobre las lagunas. Em E. Bulygin (ed.), El libro de los premisos (pp. 107-122). Marcial Pons.
  • Born, G. B. (2021). International Arbitration: Law and Practice (Third Edition). Kluwer Law International.
  • Bulygin, E. (2019) En defensa de el Dorado: Respuesta a Fernando Atría. Em E. Bulygin (ed.), El libro de los premisos (pp. 123-137). Marcial...
  • Chartered Institute of Arbitrators [CIArb] (2007). Protocol for the Use of Party-Appointed Expert Witnesses in International Arbitration....
  • Cruz e Tucci, J. R. (1987). A motivação da sentença no processo civil. Editora Saraiva.
  • Cywicki, K. e Grose, M. (2017). Pleadings or Memorials: Which Are More Appropriate for Construction Arbitrations? BCDR International Arbitration...
  • Dias, A. e Gomides, G. C. (2023). Meio de prova na ausência de prova: inferência negativa. Em J. L. L. Neto e B. Guandalini (eds.), Provas...
  • Ferrer Beltrán, J. (2011). Prueba sin convicción. Estándares de prueba y debido proceso. Marcial Pons.
  • Gaillard, E. e Savage, J. (eds.) (1999). Fouchard Gaillard Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration. Kluwer Law International.
  • Gadamer, H. G. (2009). Dos Mestres e Discípulos. Em H. G. Gadamer, Herança e Futuro da Europa. Edições 70.
  • Gaillard, E. (2008). Aspects philosophiques du droit de l’arbitrage international. Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Garnett, R. (2022). Demystifying the Burden of Proof in International Arbitration. Em F. Ferrari e F. J. Rosenfeld (eds.), Handbook of Evidence...
  • Goldman, B. (1963). Les conflits de lois dans l’arbitrage international de droit privé. Em Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International...
  • Gupta, S. e Kunstyr, J. (7 novembro 2022). English court rekindles the debate on the form of interim measures in English-seated arbitrations:...
  • Hume, D. (2002) A Treatise of Human Nature. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/4705/4705-h/4705-h.htm.
  • Kleinheisterkamp, J. (2023). The Myth of Transnational Public Policy in International Arbitration. The American Journal of Comparative Law,...
  • Lalive, P. (1987). Transnational (or Truly International) Public Policy and International Arbitration. Em P. Sanders (ed), Comparative Arbitration...
  • Landbrecht, J. (2021). The Autonomy of Arbitration: Autonomy À Géométrie Variable. Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, 14(1), pp. 39-82....
  • Lessa, J. (2020). Produção autônoma de provas e as tradições jurídicas: diálogo entre as experiências brasileira e anglo-americana [Tese de...
  • Mayer, P. (2001). L’arbitre international et la hiérarchie des norms. Revue de l’Arbitrage, 2011(2), pp. 361-384
  • Mayer, P., Valença Filho, C. e Kharmandayan, L. (2019). Clássicos da Arbitragem: o mito da ordem jurídica de base (ou Grundlegung). Revista...
  • von Mehren, R. B. (1996). Burden of Proof in International Arbitration. Em A. J. van den Berg (ed.), ICCA Congress Series: Planning Efficient...
  • Michaels, R. (2008). The True Lex Mercatoria: Law Beyond the State. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 14(2); Duke Law School Public...
  • Mitidiero, D. (2020). O ônus da prova e seus inimigos. Revista de Processo, 45(306), p. 17–47.
  • Nieva-Fenoll, J. e Pereira, F. S. (2022). Ónus da Prova e Standards de Prova: duas reminiscências do passado. Lusíada. Direito, 27/28, p....
  • Neto, J. L. L. e Guandalini, B. (eds.) (2023). Provas e Arbitragem. Teoria, Cultura, Dogmática e Prática. Thomson Reuters, Revista dos Tribunais.
  • Paulsson, J. (1983). Delocalization of International Commercial Arbitration: When and Why it Matters. International and Comparative Law Quarterly,...
  • Paulsson, J. (2008). Unlawful Laws and the Authority of International Tribunals: The Lalive Lecture, Genéve, May, 27, 2009. ICSID Review:...
  • Piché, M. R. e Jalles, S. de S. (4 abril 2020). The Armesto Schedule: a Step Further to a More Efficient Document Production. Kluwer Arbitration...
  • Pinheiro, L. L. (2017). The confluence of transnational rules and national directives as the legal framework of transnational arbitration...
  • Rabello, A. M. (2004). Non liquet: from Modern Law to Roman Law. Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law, 10, pp. 1-25.
  • Sachs, K. (2010). Experts: Neutrals or Advocates, with the assistance of Dr. Nils Schmidt-Ahrendts. https://www.josemigueljudice-arbitration.com/xms/files/02_TEXTOS_ARBITRAGEM/01_Doutrina_ScolarsTexts/evidence/experts__icca_2010_sachs.pdf.
  • Silva, P. C. (no prelo). Accord des parties sur la procédure ou décision des arbitres?: la piège de Francfort et la petrification d’un processus...
  • Silva, P. C. (1992). Anulação e recursos da decisão arbitral. Revista da Ordem dos Advogados, 52(3), pp. 893-1008. https://portal.oa.pt/upl/%7B1aa6c623-9631-4f92-a89c-9c1a16323787%7D.pdf....
  • Silva, P. C. (2009). A nova face da justiça: os meios extrajudiciais de resolução de controvérsias. relatório sobre o conteúdo, programa e...
  • Silva, P. C. (2010). O custo da Justiça. Cadernos de Direito Privado, 1, Especial Dezembro de 2010, pp. 57-75
  • Silva, P. C. (2011). Legalidade das formas de processo e gestão processual ou as duas faces de Janus. Revista de Informação Legislativa, 48(190),...
  • Silva, P. C. (2012). Cautela e certeza: breve apontamento acerca do proposto regime de inversão do contencioso na tutela cautelar. Em Debate...
  • Silva, P. C. (2022a). A decisão arbitral entre o acto e o negócio. Católica Law Review, 6(2), pp. 113-128. https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/catolicalawreview/article/view/11414
  • Silva, P. C. (2022b). Arbitration, Jurisdiction and Culture: Apropos the Rules of Prague. Em P. Silva, Estudos de Arbitragem (vol. 1, pp....
  • Silva, P. C. (2022c). Constitucionalidade e arbitragem: controlo de constitucionalidade por tribunais arbitrais e controlo de constitucionalidade...
  • Silva, P. C. (2022d). Online Dispute Resolution and the Virtual Hearings: Six Characters in Search of an Author. Em P. Silva, Estudos de Arbitragem...
  • Silva, P. C. (2022e). Responsabilidade por conduta processual. Litigância de má fé e tipos especiais. Almedina.
  • Silva, P. e Reis, N. (2019). Efeitos lícitos da prova ilícita em processo estadual e arbitral. AAFDL.
  • Sharpe, J. K. (2006). Drawing Adverse Inferences from the Non-production of Evidence. Arbitration International, 22(4), pp. 549-572. https://icsid.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/parties_publications/C3765/Respondent%27s%20Rejoinder%20%28redacted%20per%20PO10%29/Pi%C3%A8ces%20juridiques/RL-0110.pdf.
  • Singarajah, F. (17 janeiro 2020). Cultural differences in international arbitration. Practical law arbitration blog. http://arbitrationblog.practicallaw.com/cultural-differences-in-international-arbitration/.
  • Stone Sweet, A. (2006). The new Lex Mercatoria and transnational governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(5), pp. 627–646. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1569352.
  • Taruffo, M. (2014). A motivação da sentença civil (trad., Daniel Mitidiero, Rafael Abreu e Vitor Paula Ramos). Marcial Pons.
  • Taruffo, M. (25 junho 2018). Inferencias fácticas en las decisiones judiciales. [Vídeo]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMeaQyAkdcI.
  • Thaman, S. C. (2011). Should Criminal Juries Give Reasons for Their Verdicts?: The Spanish Experience and the Implications of the European...
  • Theofrastous, T. C. (1999). International Commercial Arbitration in Europe: subsidiary and supremacy in light of the de-localization debate....
  • Waincymer, J. (2012). Procedure and Evidence in International Arbitration. Wolters Kluwer.
  • Whitman, J. Q. (2008). The Origins of Reasonable Doubt: Theological Roots of the Criminal Trial. Yale University Press.
  • Soft Law & Outras fontes de informação
  • Australian Center for International Commercial Arbitration. ACICA Practice & Procedures Board [ACICA] (2020). Explanatory Note: Memorials...
  • ELI-UNIDROIT Model European Rules of Civil Procedure: from transnational principles to European rules of civil procedure (2020). https://www.europeanlawinstitute.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/p_eli/Publications/200925-eli-unidroit-rules-e.pdf
  • Glencore Finance (Bermuda) Limited v. Plurinational State of Bolivia, case no. 2016-39, Permanent Court of Arbitration [PCA]. https://italaw.com/cases/documents/7787
  • International Bar Association [IBA] (2020). IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration. https://www.ibanet.org/resources.
  • International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID] (2016). Draft procedural order no. 1. https://icsid.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/Draft%20Procedural%20Order%20No%201.pdf
  • International Chamber of Commerce [ICC] (2021). 2021 Arbitration Rules. https://iccwbo.org/dispute-resolution/dispute-resolution-services/arbitration/rules-procedure/2021-arbitration-rules/
  • International Council for Commercial Arbitration [ICCA] (2015). ICCA Checklist First procedural order. https://cdn.arbitration-icca.org/s3fs-public/document/media_document/07042015_icca_checklist_first_procedural_order_a5_qr_final.pdf
  • Lei Modelo da UNCITRAL sobre Arbitragem Comercial Internacional (2011). https://dgpj.justica.gov.pt/Portals/31/Edi%C3%A7%C3%B5es%20DGPJ/Lei-modelo_uncitral.pdf?ver=BNXecmWCrRQkw6nwQRHOYQ%3D%3D.
  • London School of Economics and Political Science [LSE] (23 maio 2012). Unlawful Laws: how far can arbitrators go?: 3rd LSE Arbitration Debate....
  • PT Ventures SGPS S.A. v. Vidatel Ltd., Mercury - Serviços de Telecomunicacões S.A. and Geni SA, Case No. 21404/ASM/JPA (C-21757/ASM), International...
  • Rules on Conduct of the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration (The Prague Rules) (2018). https://praguerules.com/upload/medialibrary/9dc/9dc31ba7799e26473d92961d926948c9.pdf
  • Sociétés BKMI et Siemens v Société Dutco, Cour de Cassation (1ère Chambre Civile), 7 de Janeiro de 1992
  • Taxquet v. Belgium, nº 926/05, European Court of Human Rights, 16 November 2010 https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/a77480/pdf
  • United Nations Commission on International Trade Law [UNCITRAL] (2016). Notes on Organizing Arbitral Proceedings. https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/arb-notes-2016-e.pdf.