“El despertar de las máquinas”: Reflexiones sobre el estatus moral y jurídico de la Inteligencia Artificial

• Carlos Aguilar Blanc ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidad de Huelva

     Universidad de Huelva

     Huelva, España

     
• Localización: Revista internacional de pensamiento político, ISSN 1885-589X, Nº. 18, 2023, págs. 213-242
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.46661/revintpensampolit.8529
• Títulos paralelos:
  • “The awakening of the machines”: Reflections on the rights and moral status of artificial intelligence
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo  1    2  
• Dialnet Métricas: 1 Cita
• Resumen
  • español

    La posible creación de formas de Inteligencia Artificial cada vez más cercanas, equivalentes o superiores a la inteligencia humana, nos plantea nuevos y complejos dilemas ético-jurídicos. Dada la creciente sofisticación de la IA, resulta crucial investigar si cabría dotarla de estatus moral y jurídico, y cómo ello se manifestaría en el reconocimiento de derechos y deberes para los entes artificiales. El objetivo es determinar las consecuencias iusfilosóficas derivadas del reconocimiento de derechos a la IA avanzada en relación a los fundamentos de los derechos humanos. Tras el necesario análisis conceptual, se concluye que se requiere un nuevo paradigma ético-jurídico que reconcilie cautamente unos hipotéticos derechos de las entidades con IA con los derechos de la especie humana.

  • English

    the possible creation of increasingly sophisticated forms of Artificial Intelligence, equivalent or superior to human intelligence, poses new and complex ethical-legal dilemmas for us. Given the increasing sophistication of AI, it is crucial to investigate whether it could be endowed with moral and legal status, and how this would be manifested in recognizing rights and duties for artificial entities. the goal is to determine the legal-philosophical consequences derived from recognizing rights for advanced AI in relation to the foundations of human rights. After the necessary conceptual analysis, it is concluded that a new ethical-legal paradigm is required that cautiously reconciles hypothetical rights of AI entities with the rights of the human species.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Aleksander, I. (2017), 7. Machine Consciousness. En S. Schneider y M. Velmans (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to consciousness. eTextbook....
  • Alpaydin, E. (2020). Introduction to machine learning. MIT press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13811.001.0001
  • Arkin, R. C. (2009). Governing lethal behavior: Embedding ethics in a hybrid deliberative/reactive robot architecture. Proceedings of GECCO...
  • Asaro, P. M. (2007). Robots and responsibility from a legal perspective. Proceedings of the IEEE, 95(2), 491-498. https://peterasaro.org/writing/ASARO%20Legal%20Perspective.pdf.
  • Beck, S. (2016). The problem of ascribing legal responsibility in the case of robotics. AI & society, Vol.31 (4), p.473-481, 473-481....
  • Bostrom, N. & Yudkowsky, E. (2014) The ethics of artificial intelligence. En The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge...
  • Bostrom, N. (2005). A history of transhumanist thought. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr_2005_26
  • Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. eBook. Oxford University Press.
  • Bostrom, N. (2016). Superinteligencia: Caminos, peligros, estrategias. eBook. Ed. Teell.
  • Bryson, J J., Theodorou, A. (2019) How society can maintain human-centric artificial intelligence In: Marja Toivonen and Eveliina Saari (ed.),...
  • Bryson, J. J. (2010), Robots should be slaves. En Wilks, Yorick. Close engagements with artificial companions: key social, psychological,...
  • Bryson, J. J. (2020). The artificial intelligence of the ethics of artificial intelligence: An introductory overview for law and regulation....
  • Bryson, J. J., Diamantis, M. E., & Grant, T. D. (2017). Of, for, and by the people: the legal lacuna of synthetic persons. Artificial...
  • Chalmers, D. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford University Press.
  • Chalmers, D. (2010). The singularity: a philosophical analysis. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 17(9-10), 7-65. https://consc.net/papers/singularity.pdf
  • Chopra, S., & White, L. (2011). A legal theory for autonomous artificial agents. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.356801
  • Coeckelbergh, M. (2017). Moral appearances: emotions, robots, and human morality.en Wallach, W. & Asaro,P., Machine Ethics and robot ethics....
  • Dennett, D. (1998). Brainchildren: Essays on designing minds. Penguin Books. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1663.001.0001
  • Dennett, D. (2017). From bacteria to Bach and back: The evolution of minds. WW Norton & Company.
  • Dennett, D. C. (1995). La conciencia explicada. Paidos Iberica.
  • Dennett, D. C. (2008). Can there be intentionality? Should there be? In A. Ross, D. Brook, & D. Thompson (Eds.), Dennett's philosophy:...
  • Díez Spelz, J. F. (2021). ¿Robots con derechos?: la frontera entre lo humano y lo no-humano. Reflexiones desde la teoría de los derechos humanos....
  • European Commission (2020). White Paper on Artificial Intelligence: a European approach to excellence and trust. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/commission-white-paper-artificial-intelligence-feb2020_en.pdf
  • Frankish, Keith. (2014). Introduction en Keith Frankish and William M. Ramsey, The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence, Cambridge....
  • Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our posthuman future. Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
  • Goertzel, B., & Pennachin, C. (Eds.). (2007). Artificial general intelligence. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68677-4
  • Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press.
  • Gordon Graell, R. D. (2021). Inteligencia artificial: la caja de herramientas virtuales al servicio de la bioinformática. Tecnociencia, 24(2),...
  • Grace, K., Salvatier, J., Dafoe, A., Zhang, B., & Evans, O. (2017). When Will AI Exceed Human Performance? Evidence from AI Experts. ArXiv....
  • Gunkel, D. J. (2018). Robot rights. ePub Version 1.0. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11444.001.0001
  • Habermas, J. (2010). Teoría de la acción comunicativa I. Taurus.
  • Hallevy, G. (2014). Liability for Crimes Involving Artificial Intelligence Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10124-8
  • Inayatullah, S., & McNally, P. (1988). The rights of robots: Technology, culture and law in the 21st century. Futures, 20(2), 119-136....
  • Kant, I. (2012) Fundamentación para una metafísica de las costumbres. Alianza Editorial. Documento original publicado en (1785).
  • Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near. Viking Penguin.
  • Lara, F. & Deckers, J. La inteligencia artificial como asistente socrático para la mejora moral. En Lara, F. y J. Savulescu (Eds), 2021,...
  • Leenes, R., Palmerini, E., Koops, B. J., Bertolini, A., Salvini, P., & Lucivero, F. (2017). Regulatory challenges of robotics: some guidelines...
  • Locke, J. (2005) Ensayo sobre el entendimiento humano. Fondo de Cultura Económica. (Documento original publicado en 1689).
  • Matthias, A. (2004). The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata. Ethics and Information Technology,...
  • Mendis, D. (2019). "TheCLAIM": A model for allocating responsibility and liability for claims of harm arising from the acts and omissions...
  • Moor, J. H. (2006). The nature, importance, and difficulty of machine ethics. IEEE intelligent systems, 21(4), 18-21. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2006.80
  • Ng, A. (2021). What artificial intelligence can and can't do right now. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2016/11/what-artificial-intelligence-can-and-cant-do-right-now
  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2007). Las fronteras de la justicia: Consideraciones sobre la exclusión. Paidós Ibérica.
  • Penrose, R. (1989). The Emperor's New Mind. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198519737.001.0001
  • Pico della Mirandola, G. (2006). Discurso sobre la dignidad del hombre. Editorial Pí. (Documento original publicado en 1486).
  • Porcelli, A. M. (2020). La inteligencia artificial y la robótica: sus dilemas sociales, éticos y jurídicos. Estudios sobre Derecho y Justicia...
  • Russell, S. (2019). Human compatible: Artificial intelligence and the problem of control. Penguin.
  • Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
  • Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2010). Inteligencia artificial: un enfoque moderno. Pearson Educación.
  • Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and brain sciences, 3(3), 417-424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756
  • Singer, P. (1999). Liberación animal. Trotta. (Documento original publicado en 1975).
  • Solum, L. B. (1992). Legal personhood for artificial intelligences. North Carolina Law Review, 70(4), 1231-1287. http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol70/iss4/4
  • Stahl, B. C., Timmermans, J., & Flick, C. (2016). Ethics of emerging information and communication technologies: On the implementation...
  • Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0: Being human in the age of artificial intelligence. Knopf.
  • van Wynsberghe, A. (2013). Designing robots for care: Care centered value-sensitive design. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(2), 407-433....
  • Villasmil Espinoza, J. J. (2021). Implicaciones de la inteligencia artificial para la humanidad. Revista de la Universidad del Zulia, 12(32),...
  • Vinge, V. (1993). The coming technological singularity. Whole Earth Review, 10. http://www.aids-3d.com/technologicalsingularity.pdf
  • Wallach, W., Allen, C., & Smit, I. (2008). Machine morality: Bottom-up and top-down approaches for modelling human moral faculties. AI...
  • Wojtyla, K. (2011/1979). Persona y acción. Ediciones Palabra.