Data retention and the future of large-scale surveillance: The evolution and contestation of judicial benchmarks

• Valsamis Mitsilegas ^[1] ; Elspeth Guild ^[1] ; Elif Kuskonmaz ^[2] ; Niovi Vavoula ^[1]
  1. [1] Queen Mary University of London

     Queen Mary University of London

     Reino Unido

     
  2. [2] University of Portsmouth

     University of Portsmouth

     Southsea, Reino Unido

     
• Localización: European Law Journal, ISSN-e 1468-0386, Vol. 29, Nº. 1-2, 2023 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Special Issue:Law and common good in the digital age: Where art thou?), págs. 176-211
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.1111/eulj.12417
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Dialnet Métricas: 1 Cita
• Resumen

  • Recent and upcoming judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) haveresurfaced a much-debated topic on the legal limitations of law enforcement authorities and intelli-gence services under EU law in implementing surveillance operations. In its decisions, the CJEU hasreinstated and at times remoulded its case-law on data retention, unearthing a variety of legal issues.This article aims to critically analyse the legal limitations of (indiscriminate) surveillance measures,the role of the private sector in the scheme, and the line between the competence of the MemberStates and that of the EU on national security matters. It also aims to remark on the latest develop-ments on the reception of the decisions by the Member States and the EU legislator, as well as onthe ongoing dialogue between the CJEU and the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR).