Sostenibilidad y florecimiento humano. La fundamentación del ecomodernismo desde el enfoque de las capacidades

• Lara de la Fuente, Daniel ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidad de Málaga

     Universidad de Málaga

     Málaga, España

     
• Localización: Revista española de ciencia política, ISSN 1575-6548, Nº. 63, 2023, págs. 167-187
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.21308/recp.63.07
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Sustainability and Human Flourishing: Towards a Normative Theory of Ecomodernism Through the Capabilities Approach
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen
  • español

    El ecomodernismo defiende que un mundo justo y sostenible solo es posible si se logra desacoplar, mediante el empleo adecuado del conocimiento y la técnica, el bienestar y el desarrollo humano de sus impactos medioambientales. Este artículo justifica la idoneidad del enfoque de las capacidades para dar cuerpo normativo a esta noción básica. Para ello, primero se demostrará que ambos planteamientos comparten dos metas: florecimiento humano y libertad de elección. A continuación, se expondrá la concepción ecomodernista de la capacidad ecológica sostenible y su relación con los techos de capacidad. Finalmente, se defenderá una versión «débil» de esta filosofía medioambiental, guiada por criterios limitaristas y suficientistas de justicia distributiva de bienes y servicios ecosistémicos.

  • English

    Ecomodernists argue that decoupling human well-being of its ecological impacts through a wise use of science and technology is required to reach justice and sustainability in the Anthropocene. This article defends the pertinence of the Capabilities Approach to support normatively this notion by the following way. Firstly, I argue that ecomodernism shares with the Capabilities Approach a specific meaning of human flourishing derived from freedom of choice. Secondly, I present an ecomodernist conception of the Sustainable Ecological Capacity, as well as its links with the capability ceilings to establish the foundations of my proposal. Finally, I conclude that such an exploration brings to a new «weak» ecomodernism, based on a simultaneous application of sufficientarian and limitarian accounts on distributive justice of ecosystem goods and services.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Agencia Internacional de la Energía (2023). Energy Efficiency. The Decade for Action. Disponible en: https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-efficiency-the-decade-for-action.
  • Alexander, J. M. (2008). Capabilities and Social Justice. Oxon, New York: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315260914.
  • Ausubel, J. (1996). The Liberation of the Environment. Daedalus, 125(3), 1-17. Disponible en : https://www.jstor.org/stable/20027368.
  • Asafu-Adjaye, J. et al. (2015) An Ecomodernist Manifesto. Disponible en: http://www.ecomodernism.org/
  • Axelsen, David V. y Lasse Nielsen (2015). «Sufficiency as Freedom from Duress». The Journal of Political Philosophy, 23(4), 406-426. DOI:...
  • Bowen, A., Fankhauser, S. (2011). «The green growth narrative: Paradigm shift or just spin?».Global Environmental Change, 21(4), 1157-1159....
  • Brand, Stewart (2010). Whole Earth Discipline. New York: Penguin Books.
  • Carpintero Óscar y Fernando A. Frechoso (2023). «Energía, sostenibilidad y transición: nuevos desafíos y problemas pendientes». Arbor, 199(807)....
  • Clark, Michael A. et. al (2020). «Global food system emissions could preclude achieving the 1.5° and 2°C climate change targets». Science,...
  • Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). «The Anthropocene». Journal de Physique IV, 12(10), 1-5. DOI: 10.1051 /jp4:20020447.
  • Crutzen, Paul y Eugene Stoermer (2000) «The Anthropocene’». Global Change Newsletter, 41, 17-18.
  • Defries, Ruth. et.al (2012). «Planetary Opportunities: A Social Contract for Global Change Science to Contribute to a Sustainable Future»....
  • Enríquez Sánchez, José María, Carmen Duce y Luis Javier Miguel (2020). Repensar la sostenibilidad. Editorial UNED.
  • Gabrielson, Teena, et. al (2015). The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Political Theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199685271.001.0001.
  • Hausfather, Zeke (2021). «Absolute Decoupling of Economic Growth and Emissions in 32 Countries.» The BreakThrough Institute. Disponible en:...
  • Holland, Breena (2008a). «Justice and the Environment in Nussbaum’s ‘Capabilities Approach’: Why Sustainable Ecological Capacity is a Meta-Capability»....
  • Holland, Breena (2008b). «Ecology and the Limits of Justice: Establishing ‘Capability Ceilings’ in Nussbaum’s Capabilities Approach.» Journal...
  • Holland, Breena (2014). Allocating the Earth: A Distributional Framework for Protecting Capabilities in Environmental Law and Policy. Oxford:...
  • Holland, Breena (2022). Capabilities, Future Generations, and Climate Justice. En Steven Gardiner (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Intergenerational...
  • Kallis, Giorgos (2021). «Limits, ecomodernism and degrowth». Political Geography, 87, 102367. DOI:10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102367
  • Karlsson, Rasmus (2018). «The high-energy planet». Global Change, Peace & Security, 30(1), 77-84. DOI: 10.1080/14781158.2018.1428946.
  • Keefer, Chistopher (presentador) (2021, 21 de octubre). «Ted Nordhaus Deconstructs Degrowth» [episodio de pódcast de audio]. En Decouple Media....
  • Lewis, Martin. W. (1993). «On Human Connectedness with Nature». New Literary History, 24(4), 797-809. https://doi.org/10.2307/469393.
  • Lewis, Martin. W. (1995). Green Delusions: An Environmentalist Critique of Radical Environmentalism. Durham and London: Duke University Press...
  • Maslow, Abraham (1943). «A theory of human motivation». Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
  • Moyano, Cristian. (2021). Los límites de la igualdad de capacidades. De la ganadería intensiva a la renaturalización. Puyol, Ángel y Filka...
  • Naciones Unidas (2015). Paris Agreement. Disponible en: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf.
  • Nordhaus, Ted y Michael Shellenberger (2004). «The Death of Environmentalism». Global Warming Politics in a Post-Environmental World. Disponible...
  • Nordhaus Ted y Michael Shellenberger (2009). Break Through. Why We Can’t Leave Saving the Planet to Environmentalists. Boston: Mariner Books.
  • Nussbaum, Marta C. (1988). «Nature, Function, and Capability: Aristotle on Political Distribution». En Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy:...
  • Nussbaum, Martha. C. (2000). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841286.
  • Nussbaum, Martha C. (2006). Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. http://dx.doi.org/j.ctv1c7zftw.
  • Nussbaum, Martha C. (2011). Creating Capabilites. The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA; London: Belknap Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061200.
  • Robeyns, Ingrid (2017). «Having too Much». Nomos, Wealth, 58, 1-44. Disponible en: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26785948.
  • Robeyns, Ingrid (2022). «Why Limitarianism?» The Journal of Political Philosophy, 30(2), 249-270. DOI: 10.1111/jopp.12275.
  • Ritchie, Hannah (2021). «Many countries have decoupled economic growth from CO2 emissions, even if we take offshored production into account»....
  • Rockström, Johan, et. al (2009). «Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity». Ecology and Society, 14(2), 32-64....
  • Schuppert, (2014). «Distinguishing basic needs and fundamental interests». Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy,...
  • Sen, Amartya (1980). «Equality of What?». En McMurrin, S. (ed.). Tanner Lectures on Human Values, vol.1 (pp.197-220). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge...
  • Sen, Amartya (1988). «Freedom of choice: Concept and content». European Economic Review, 32, (2-3), 269-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(88)90173-0.
  • Sen, Amartya (1993). «Capability and Well-being». En Nussbaum and Sen (eds.). The Quality of Life (pp.30-53). New York: Oxford University...
  • Sen, Amartya (1999). Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf.
  • Smil, Vaclav (2010). «Energy, Ethics and Civilization». En Yiao, Raymond, et. al (eds). Visions of Discovery: New Light on Physics, Cosmology,...
  • Smil, Vaclav (2013). Should we eat meat ? Evolution and consequences of modern carnivory. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118278710.
  • Steffen,Will, et al. (2015). «Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet». Science, 347, (6223), 736. DOI: 10.1126/science.1259855
  • Symons, Jonathan. (2019). Ecomodernism: Technology, Politics, and the Climate Crisis. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Symons, Jonathan y Rasmus Karlsson (2018). «Ecomodernist citizenship: rethinking political obligations in a climate-changed world». Citizenship...