Acceso usuarios
Juan Miguel Alburquerque Sacristán 
En esta contribución se analizan, a modo de introducción, las diferentes perspectivas, históricas y actuales sobre los aspectos más sobresalientes de la legitimación popular como garantía de los derechos de la ciudadanía. Asimismo, este estudio se centra, especialmente, dentro del contexto de la legitimación (qui volet ex populo), en el interdicto popular “ne quid in flumine publico ripave eius fiat, quo peius navigetur (D. 43,12,1 pr.)”, y el ámbito de aplicación, destacando la complejidad conceptual de río público; ríos privados; ríos navegables y no navegables. Con el análisis de las perspectivas doctrinales y jurisprudenciales y las observaciones sobre la polémica extensión de Labeón -vía útil- a los ríos no navegables (D. 43, 12,1, 12), completamos el estudio, cuestionando el principio de la navegabilidad como criterio rector de la publicidad.
This contribution analyzes, by way of introduction, the different perspectives, historical and the different historical and current perspectives on the most outstanding aspects of popular aspects of popular legitimacy as a guarantee of citizenship rights, rights of citizenship. Likewise, this study focuses on the context of popular legitimization as a guarantee of citizenship rights, especially, within the context of legitimation (qui volet ex populo), on the popular interdict ne quid in flumine publico ripave eius fiat, quo peius navigetur (D. 43,12,1 pr.) of application, highlighting the conceptual complexity of public rivers; private rivers; navigable and on-navigable rivers. With the analysis of doctrinal and jurisprudential doctrinal and jurisprudential perspectives and observations on the controversial on the polemic extension of Labeón -useful waterway- to non-navigable rivers (D. 43, 43, 3) navigable rivers (D. 43, 12,1,12), we complete the study, questioning the principle of principle of navigability as a guiding criterion of publicity.
