Assessing the fairness of the EU Council qualified majority voting. A voting power critical perspective of the liberal intergovernmentalist accounts

• Ion, Oana Andreea ^[1]
  1. [1] National University of Political Studies and Public Administration (SNSPA)
• Localización: European Journal of Government and Economics, ISSN-e 2254-7088, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2023, págs. 39-57
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.17979/ejge.2023.12.1.9335
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • The Qualified Majority Voting (QMV) used by the Council of the European Union developed to a high degree of complexity from one modifying treaty to another, until the latest definition stipulated in the Treaty of Lisbon. This paper analyses this EU intra-institutional voting method using a rational choice approach and emphasizes that there are situations when not even the institutions, as rational actors, can avoid a collective irrational outcome even when they are addressing subjects such as voting power distribution. It also addresses several shortcomings of the Liberal Intergovernmentalist explanatory framework focusing on the insufficiently developed level of credible institutional commitments. The core part of the article consists in investigating several types of EU Council internal decision-making options, proposing how they can be designed to be considered in the same time fair and efficient, and in analysing how close this voting power ideal type configuration is to the current decisional system.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Anonymous. (2017). Not dead yet. Revisiting the 'Luxembourg Veto' and its Foundations. European Constitutional Law Review, 13(1),...
  • Aleskerov, F., Avci, G., Iakouba, V., and Umut Türem, Z. (2002). European Union Enlargement: Power Distribution Implications of the New Institutional...
  • Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
  • Barr, J., and Passarelli, F. (2009). Who has the power in the EU?. Mathematical Social Sciences, 57 (3), 339-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2008.12.007
  • Cichocki, M.A., and Życzkowski, K., eds. (2011). Institutional design and voting power in the European Union. 1 ed. London: Routledge.
  • Dahl, R. (1991). Democracy and its critics. Yale University Press.
  • European Commission. (2020). Shaping the Conference on the Future of Europe. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament...
  • European Council / Council of the European Union. (2022). Qualified majority. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/council-eu/voting-system/qualified-majority/....
  • European Union. (2022). Conference on the Future of Europe. Report on the Final Outcome (May 2022).
  • Felsenthal, D., Leech, D., List, C., and Machover, M. (2003). In Defence of Voting Power Analysis. Responses to Albert. European Union Politics,...
  • Galloway, D. (2001). The Treaty of Nice and Beyond. Realities and Illusions of Power in the EU. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
  • Ion, O.A. (2013). Guvernanta Uniunii Europene. Abordari actuale. Iasi: Polirom.
  • Kirsch, W., Slomczynski, W., Stolicki, D., and Zyczkowski, K. (2018). Double Majority and Generalized Brexit: Explaining Counterintuitive...
  • Kirsch, W. (2011). The Distribution of Power in the Council of Ministers of the European Union. In M.A. Cichocki and K. Zyczkowski (eds.)....
  • Kirsch, W. (2016). Brexit and the Distribution of Power in the Council of the EU. Centre for European Policy Studies. Available at: https://www.ceps.eu/ceps-publications/brexit-and-distribution-power-council-eu/....
  • Kleinowski, M. (2018). The impact of Brexit on the voting power in the Council of the European Union. Przegląd Europejski, 4, 95-117. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.3456
  • Leech, D., and Aziz, H. (2011). The Double Majority Voting Rule of the EU Reform Treaty as a Democratic Ideal for an Enlarging Union: An Appraisal...
  • Leech, D. (2002). Designing the Voting System for the Council of the European Union. Public Choice, 113 (3), 437 - 464. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020877015060
  • Lindblom, C.E. (1958). Policy Analysis. The American Economic Review, 48 (3), 298-312.
  • Machover, M. (2011). Penrose's Square-Root Rule and the EU Council of Ministers: Significance of the Quota. In M.A. Cichocki and K. Zyczkowski...
  • Miroiu, A. (2007). Fundamentele politicii. Rationalitate si actiune colectiva. 2nd volume. Iasi: Polirom.
  • Moberg, A. (2011). Is the Double Majority Really Double? The Voting Rules in the Lisbon Treaty. In M.A. Cichocki and K. Zyczkowski (eds.)....
  • Moravcsik, A., and Schimmelfennig, F. (2018). Liberal Intergovernmentalism. In A. Wiener, T.A. Börzel and T. Risse (eds.). European Integration...
  • Moravcsik, A. (1993). Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach. Journal of Common Market Studies,...
  • Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization, 51 (4), 513-553....
  • Niemann, A., Lefkofridi, Z., and Schmitter, P.C. (2018). Neofunctionalism. In A. Wiener, T.A. Börzel and T. Risse (eds.). European Integration...
  • Nurmi, H. (2011). On the Relative Unimportance of Voting Weights: Observations on Agenda-Based Voting Procedures. In M.A. Cichocki and K....
  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions....
  • Passarelli, F., and Barr, J. (2004). Preferences, the Agenda Setter and the Distribution of Power in the EU. Social Choice and Welfare, 28...
  • Penrose, L.S. (1946). The Elementary Statistics of Majority Voting. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 109 (1), 53-57. https://doi.org/10.2307/2981392
  • Peters, G.B. (2019). Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism. Edward Elgar Publishing. 4th edition. ISBN: 978...
  • Phinnemore, D. (2013). The Treaty of Lisbon. Origins and Negotiation. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137367877
  • Pollack, M.A. (2020). Theorizing EU Policy-Making. In H. Wallace, M.A. Pollack, C. Roederer-Rynning and A.R. Young (eds.). Policy Making in...
  • Pukelsheim, F. (2011). Putting Citizens First: Representation and Power in the European Union. In M.A. Cichocki and K. Zyczkowski (eds.)....
  • Putnam, R.D. (1988). Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization, 42 (3), 427-460. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027697
  • Shepsle, K.A., and Boncheck, M.S. (2010). Analyzing Politics. Rationality, Behavior and Institutions. 2nd edition. New York: W.W. Norton &...
  • Slapin, J.B. (2011). Veto Power. Institutional Design in the European Union. The University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.2012704
  • Slomczynski, W., and Zyczkowski, K. (2011). Jagiellonian Compromise - An Alternative Voting System for the Council of the European Union....
  • Slomczynski, W., and Zyczkowski, K. (N.d.) Jagiellonian Compromise - An Alternative Voting System for the Council of the European Union. Available...
  • Sozanski, T. (2011). The Voting Power in the Voting Systems. In M.A. Cichocki and K. Zyczkowski (eds.). Institutional Design and Voting Power...
  • Stratfor. (2018). The EU and the Unanimity Trap. Available at: https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/eu-and-unanimity-trap. Accessed on November...
  • Suzumura, K. (2016). Choice, Preferences, and Procedures. A Rational Choice Theoretic Approach. London: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674726307
  • van der Ploeg, C. (2008). The distribution of power in the Council of the European Union. BWI Werkstuk (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam). Available...
  • Verba, S. 92006). Fairness, equality, and democracy: three big words. Social Research: An International Quarterly of Social Sciences, 73(2),...
  • Warntjen, A. (2017). Do votes matter? Voting weights and the success probability of member state requests in the Council of the European Union....