Towards a more protection-oriented approach of the preliminary reference procedure: case note on Consorzio italian menagement, Catania multiservizi Spa V Rete Ferroviaria Italiana Spa, C-561/19

• Autores: Clelia Lacchi
• Localización: Revista General de Derecho Europeo, ISSN-e 1696-9634, Nº. 57, 2022
• Idioma: inglés
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Hacia un enfoque más protector del procedimiento de las cuestiones prejudiciales: comentario a consorzio italian management, catania multiservizi spa v. Rete ferroviaria italiana spa, c-561/19
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Dialnet Métricas: 1 Cita
• Resumen
  • español

    La sentencia del TJUE (Gran Sala) de 6 de octubre de 2021 ofrece algunas clarificaciones interesantes relativas a las excepciones establecidas en Cilfit al deber de realizar remisiones prejudiciales por parte de las jurisdicciones nacionales cuyas decisiones no son susceptibles de ulterior recurso según el derecho nacional. Además, la sentencia constituye una importante contribución a la tutela judicial efectiva de los individuos en el contexto del procedimiento prejudicial. En efecto, al interpretar el artículo 267 TFUE a la luz del Artículo 47 de la Carta, incorpora la obligación para las jurisdiciones nacionales de última instancia de motivar su decisión de no someter una cuestión prejudicial al TJUE

  • English

    The Judgment of the CJEU (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2021 offers some interesting clarifications concerning the exceptions, set out in Cilfit, to the duty to submit preliminary references for national courts against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law. Moreover, the judgment is an important contribution to the effective judicial protection of individuals in the context of the preliminary reference procedure. Indeed, by interpreting Article 267 TFEU in light of Article 47 of the Charter, it enshrines an obligation for national courts of last instance to state reasons for their decision not to submit a preliminary question to the CJEU

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • A. ARNULL, <>, Modern Law Review, 52 5, 1989, pp. 622-639.
  • M. BROBERG AND N. FENGER, Preliminary References to the European Court of Justice, Oxford, 2010.
  • P. MENGOZZI, <>, in E. Neframi (ed.), Renvoi préjudiciel et marge d'appréciation du juge national, 2015.
  • M. BROBERG, <>, Common Market Law Review, 45 2008.
  • N. FENGER AND M. BROBERG, <>, Yearbook of European Law, 30 1, 2011, pp. 180-212.
  • N. FENGER AND M. BROBERG, <>, Yearbook of European Law, 30 1, 2011, pp. 180-212.
  • A. KORNEZOV, <>, Common Market Law Review, 53 5, 2016, p. 1317.
  • P. VAN EMSUWEGE AND F. GREMMELPREZ, “Protecting the Rule of Law in the EU Legal Order: A Constitutional Role for the Court of Justice”, EuConst,...
  • R. HOLDGAARD, D. ELKAN, G. KROHN SCHALDEMOSE, “From cooperation to collision: The CJEU’s Ajos ruling and the Danish Supreme Court’s refusal...
  • M. CLAES, <>, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 23 1, 2016, pp. 151-170.
  • C. LACCHI, <>, Review of European Administrative Law, 8 2, 2015.
  • C. LACCHI, <>, German Law Journal - Special Issue, 16 6, 2015.
  • S. GERVASONI, “CJEU et cours suprêmes: repenser les termes du dialogue des juges?”, AJDA, 2019, p. 150 – 182.
  • C. LACCHI, “Preliminary References to the Court of Justice of the European Union and Effective Judicial Protection”, Larcier, 2020, pp. 94...
  • J.-C. BONICHOT, <>, Gazette du palais, 16 2013, pp. 227-228.
  • X. ARZOZ, The Constitutional Review of National Courts’ Compliance with the Obligation to Refer Preliminary Questions after Consorzio Italian...
  • K. LENAERTS ; J. A. GUTIERREZ-FONS, << Les méthodes d’interprétation de la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne >>, Larcier,...
  • E. DUBOUT, <>, Revue trimestrielle des droits de l'homme, 70, 2007 , p. 397-398.
  • C. LACCHI, “Preliminary References to the Court of Justice of the European Union and Effective Judicial Protection”, Larcier, 2020, pp. 86...
  • N. CARIAT AND L. LEBŒUF, <>, Journal des tribunaux, 32 2012, p. 676.
  • J. MALENOVSKÝ, <>, Journal de droit européen, 6 200, 2013, p. 220.
  • J. POLAKIEWICZ, <>, in T. Giegerich, D. Schmitt and S. Zeitzmann (ed.), Flexibility in the EU and Beyond How much differentiation can...
  • M. SAFJAN AND D. DÜSTERHAUs, "A Union of Effective Judicial Protection: Addressing a Multi-level Challenge through the Lens of Article...
  • M. SCHMAUCH, <>, Europan Law Reporter, 12 2011, p. 365.
  • K. LENAERTS AND E. DE SMIJTER, <>, Maastricht J Eur & Comp L, 8 90, 2001, p. 99.
  • S. MORANO-FOADI AND S. ANDREADAKIS, <>, European Law Journal, 17 5, 2011, p. 597.
  • M. SCHMAUCH, <>, European Law Reporter, 2 2015, p. 42.
  • C. LACCHI, “Preliminary References to the Court of Justice of the European Union and Effective Judicial Protection”, Larcier, 2020, pp. 94...
  • A. ÉPINEY, <>, Cahiers de droit européen, 2 2014, pp. 283-303.
  • V. KRONENBERGER, "Quand << mise en œuvre >> rime avec << champ d’application >> : la Cour précise les situations...
  • H. KAILA, <>, in P. Cardonnel, A. Rosas and N. Wahl (ed.), Constitutionalising the EU judicial system: essays in honour of Pernilla...
  • M. SCHMAUCH, "The Preliminary Ruling Proceudre and the Right to a Fair Trial", Europan Law Reporter, 12 2011, p. 366.
  • A. KORNEZOV, <>, Common Market Law Review, 53 5, 2016, p. 1340.