Localising Global Norms: The Case of Family-Friendly Parliaments

• Palmieri, Sonia ^[1] ; Baker, Kerryn ^[1]
  1. [1] Australian National University

     Australian National University

     Australia

     
• Localización: Parliamentary affairs: A journal of representative politics, ISSN 0031-2290, Vol. 75, Nº 1, 2022, págs. 58-75
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.1093/pa/gsaa050
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • In this article, we extend empirical understandings of feminist institutionalism by outlining a new methodological approach to the study of parliament as a gendered workplace. We argue that while a localised approach to studying institutional change allows a more nuanced appreciation of the role of local cultural context, internationalised norms can be an interesting starting point to work back from. A case study of the New Zealand parliament’s ‘family-friendly’ workplace practices illustrates this methodological approach. By tracing the establishment of family-friendly practices in this parliament, our study shines a light on the intractable nature of local institutional context in global norm diffusion and hints at the next phase of work required to further the agenda of transformational gender-sensitive parliaments.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Acharya, (2004), International Organization, 58, pp. 239, 10.1017/S0020818304582024
  • Adler, (2011), International Theory, 3, pp. 1, 10.1017/S175297191000031X
  • Baker, (2019), Gender Innovation in Political Science: New Norms, New Knowledge, pp. 1
  • Battilana, (2009), Academy of Management Annals, 3, pp. 65, 10.5465/19416520903053598
  • Bjarnegård, (2013), Gender, Informal Institutions and Political Recruitment: Explaining Male Dominance in Parliamentary Representation, 10.1057/9781137296740
  • Chappell, (2006), Politics & Gender, 2, pp. 223, 10.1017/S1743923X06221044
  • Checkel, (2015), Process Tracing: From Analytic Metaphor to Best Practices, pp. 41
  • Childs, (2016), The Good Parliament
  • Curtin, (2008), Parliamentary Affairs, 61, pp. 490, 10.1093/pa/gsn014
  • Curtin, (2019), The Palgrave Handbook of Women’s Political Rights, pp. 129, 10.1057/978-1-137-59074-9_9
  • Engberg-Pedersen, (2018), Progress in Development Studies, 18, pp. 153, 10.1177/1464993418766583
  • Erikson, (2019), Nora - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 27, pp. 22, 10.1080/08038740.2019.1566174
  • Finnemore, (1996), International Organization, 50, pp. 325, 10.1017/S0020818300028587
  • Finnemore, (1998), International Organization, 52, pp. 887, 10.1162/002081898550789
  • Franceschet, (2008), Politics & Gender, 4, pp. 393, 10.1017/S1743923X08000342
  • Hughes, (2015), International Studies Quarterly, 59, pp. 357, 10.1111/isqu.12190
  • (2011), Gender-Sensitive Parliaments: A Global Review of Good Practice
  • Jacobs, (2015), Process Tracing: From Analytic Metaphor to Best Practices, pp. 41
  • Kirkwood, (2019), The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 21, pp. 101, 10.1177/1465750319845483
  • Krook, (2011), Gender, Politics and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism, 10.1057/9780230303911
  • Kulawik, (2009), Politics & Gender, 5, pp. 262, 10.1017/S1743923X0900021X
  • Leston-Bandeira, (2012), The Journal of Legislative Studies, 18, pp. 514, 10.1080/13572334.2012.706059
  • Lovenduski, (2010), Gender, Politics and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism, pp. vii
  • Mackay, (2011), Gender, Politics and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism, pp. 181, 10.1057/9780230303911_11
  • Mackay, (2010), International Political Science Review, 31, pp. 573, 10.1177/0192512110388788
  • Mackay, (2014), Politics & Gender, 10, pp. 659, 10.1017/S1743923X14000452
  • Mahoney, (2010), Explaining Institutional Change, pp. 1
  • Och, (2018), International Feminist Journal of Politics, 20, pp. 425, 10.1080/14616742.2018.1447312
  • (2007), Babies and Bosses: Reconciling Work and Family Life. A Synthesis of Findings for OECD Countries
  • Palmieri, (2019), Gendered Innovations in Political Science: New Norms, New Knowledge, pp. 173, 10.1007/978-3-319-75850-3_9
  • Pierce, (2017), International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15, pp. 351, 10.1080/1612197X.2017.1280834
  • Pouliot, (2015), Process Tracing: From Analytic Metaphor to Best Practices, pp. 237
  • Sawer, (2019), New Knowledge
  • True, (2016), International Political Science Review, 37, pp. 307, 10.1177/0192512116632372
  • True, (2019), Gendered Innovations in Political Science: New Norms, New Knowledge, pp. 135, 10.1007/978-3-319-75850-3_7
  • True, (2012), European Journal of International Relations, 18, pp. 103, 10.1177/1354066110380963
  • True, (2001), International Studies Quarterly, 45, pp. 27, 10.1111/0020-8833.00181
  • Wall, (2019), The Parliamentarian, 2, pp. 158
  • Waylen, (2014), Political Research Quarterly, 67, pp. 212, 10.1177/1065912913510360
  • Wängnerud, (2015), The Principles of Gender-Sensitive Parliaments, 10.4324/9781315754086
  • Wiener, (2018), Contestation and Constitution of Norms in Global International Relations, 10.1017/9781316718599