The study of innovation and absorptive capacity of BRICS countries by using multiple regression analysis

• Khalid Usman ^[2] ; Liu Zhiying ^[1] ; Shen Huayan ^[2] ; Jie Xin ^[2] ; Jin Yujia ^[2]
  1. [1] University of Science and Technology of China

     University of Science and Technology of China

     China

     
  2. [2] Guangzhou City Construction College
• Localización: International Journal of Innovation: IJI Journal, ISSN-e 2318-9975, Vol. 10, Nº. 1, 2022, págs. 118-151
• Idioma: portugués
• DOI: 10.5585/iji.v10i1.20717
• Títulos paralelos:
  • El estudio de la innovación y la capacidad de absorción de los países de brics mediante el uso de un análisis de regresión múltiple
  • O estudo da inovação e capacidade absorvente dos países do BRICS usando a análise de regressão múltipla
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
  • Texto completo
• Dialnet Métricas: 2 Citas
• Resumen
  • español

    Objetivo del estudio: El objetivo de este estudio es explorar los diferentes efectos de los sistemas de innovación de los países BRICS señalando los elementos clave y los aspectos sistémicos de los sistemas de innovación de los países BRICS, as í como su compromiso con el funcionamiento de todo el sistema y su interpretación en el desarrollo económico de esos países.

    Metodología/enfoque: Se recopilaron datos del Banco Mundial (WDI), la Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura (UNESCO), la Oficina de patentes y comercio de los Estados Unidos (USPTO) y la Organización Mundial de la propiedad intelectual (OMPI) sobre el Brasil, Rusia, la India, China y Sudáfrica (BRICS). Los datos utilizados en el siguiente estudio son series temporales, es decir, datos anuales para 1999 - 2014. El análisis de regresión múltiple se realiza utilizando el paquete de software estadístico de Ciencias Sociales (SPSS).

    Originalidad/relevancia: tenemos la intención de dedicar la literatura y la política de investigación al producir pruebas cuantitativas basadas en el marco que conecta el elemento integral del sistema de innovación al sistema económico durante un largo tiempo Resultados principales: Los resultados muestran el grado en que los componentes de los sistemas de innovación en el Brasil, Rusia, la India, China y Sudáfrica (BRIC) son interdependientes y, a este respecto, cualquier cambio en un indicador puede afectar a otros indicadores del sistema.

    Contribuciones teóricas/metodológicas: Nuestra investigación se basa en los análisis conceptuales que se extraen de la literatura existente. Se basa en un modelo para evaluar la dinámica de la capacidad de innovación, el impacto de la capacidad de absorción y la robustez del desarrollo económico.

    Contribuciones sociales/de gestión: nuestros resultados tienen una implicación significativa para los responsables políticos

  • English

    Objective of the study: This research aims to explore the diverse impacts of national innovation systems of BRICS countries by indicating the key elements and systems aspect, how these aspects have committed to the running of the whole systems and interpreted inside the economic development of these nations.

    Methodology/approach: Data were collected from the World Bank (WDI), United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), United State Patent and Trade office (USPTO), and World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) for Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS) countries. Data used for following research are time series, annual data from 1999-2014. The multi-regression analysis was completed with utilizing the Statistical package for the Social Science (SPSS).

    Originality/Relevance: We intend at devoting to the research literature and policy by producing quantitative based proof of the framework that connects the comprehensive element of innovation system to economic system for a longtime.

    Main results: The findings showed the degree to which components of the National innovation system (NIS), depend on one another for Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS) , in this regard, any changes in one indicator can effect on other indicators in the system.

    Theoretical/methodological contributions: Our research is based on the conceptual analyses which draw from the existing literature. It is based on a model to evaluate the dynamics of innovation capacity, absorptive capacity impact and robustness of the economic development.

    Social /management contributions: Our results have significant implication for policy makers.

  • português

    Objetivo do estudo: Esta pesquisa tem como objetivo explorar os diversos impactos dos sistemas nacionais de inovação dos países BRICS, indicando os principais elementos e aspectos de sistemas, como esses aspectos se comprometeram com o funcionamento de todos os sistemas e interpretados dentro do desenvolvimento econômico dessas nações.

    Metodologia / Abordagem: Foram recolhidos dados do Banco Mundial (WDI), da Organização Educacional, Científica e Cultural das Nações Unidas (UNESCO), do Gabinete de Patentes e Comércio dos Estados Unidos (USPTO) e da Organização Mundial de Propriedade Intelectual (OMPI) para o Brasil, Rússia, Índia, China e África do Sul (BRICS). Os dados utilizados para a investigação a seguir são séries cronológicas, dados anuais de 1999-2014. A análise de multi-regressão foi concluída com a utilização do pacote estatístico para a ciência social (SPSS).

    Originalidade / relevância: pretendemos dedicar à literatura e política de pesquisa, produzindo prova quantitativa baseada no quadro que liga o elemento abrangente do sistema de inovação ao sistema econômico por um longo tempo.

    Principais resultados: Os resultados mostraram até que ponto os componentes do NIS dependem um do outro para o Brasil, Rússia, Índia, China e África do Sul (BRICS) – a este respeito, qualquer mudança de um indicador pode afetar outros indicadores no sistema.

    Contribuições teóricas / metodológicas: Nossa pesquisa é baseada nas análises conceituais que retiram da literatura existente. É baseado em um modelo para avaliar a dinâmica da capacidade de inovação, impacto de capacidade de absorção e robustez do desenvolvimento econômico.

    Contribuições Sociais / Gestão: Nossos resultados têm implicação significativa para os formuladores de políticas

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Abayomi, K., Gelman, A., & Levy, M. (2008). Diagnostics for multivariate imputations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series...
  • Abramovitz, M. & David, P. A. (1996). Convergence and deferred catch-up: productivity leadership and the waning of American exceptionalism....
  • Acemoglu, D., Zilibotti, F., & Aghion, P. (2006). Distance To Frontier, Selection, and Economic Growth. Journal of the European Economic...
  • Alnafrah, I. (2019). Dynamic structural comparison of BRICS national innovation systems based on machine learning techniques. International...
  • Alnafrah, I., & Bogdanova, E. (2018). National innovation system and its role in increasing GDP per capita (Evidence from Russia). Journal...
  • Alnafrah, I., & Zeno, B. (2019). A new comparative model for national innovation systems based on machine learning classification techniques....
  • Alnafrah, I., Al Naimi, K., & Ahmad, M. (2018). A comparative analysis of national innovation systems’ structures and their developmental...
  • Arthur, D., Pang, S., Wong, T., Alexander, M. F., Drury, J., Eastwood, H., … Xiao, S. (1999). Caring attributes, professional self concept...
  • Azariadis, C., Drazen, A. (1990). Threshold Externalities in Economic Development. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105(2), 501–526. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937797
  • Balzat, M., & Hanusch, H. (2004). Recent trends in the research on national innovation systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(2),...
  • Banerjee, A., Marcellino, M., & Osbat, C. (2004). Some cautions on the use of panel methods for integrated series of macroeconomic data....
  • Banerjee, Anindya and Carrion-i-Silvestre, Josep Lluís,(2006). Cointegration in Panel Data with Breaks and Cross-Section Dependence (February...
  • Biryukova, O. V., & Matiukhina, A. I. (2019). ICT services trade in the BRICS countries: Special and common features. Journal of the Knowledge...
  • Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2003). Business Research Methods. New York: Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmén, M., & Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy,...
  • Cassiolato, J. E., & Vitorino, V. (2009). BRICS and development alternatives: Innovation systems and policies. In BRICS and development...
  • Castellacci, F., & Natera, J. M. (2013). The dynamics of national innovation systems: A panel cointegration analysis of the coevolution...
  • Castellacci, F., Archibugi, D. (2008). The technology clubs: The distribution of knowledge across nations. Research Policy, 37(47061), 1659–1673....
  • Castellacci, F., Natera, J. M. (2011). A new panel dataset for cross-country analyses of national systems, growth and development (CANA)....
  • Cohen et al. (2003). Sociablility and suspectaiblility to the common cold. American Psychological Society, 14(5), 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.01452
  • Durlauf, S.N., Johnson, P.A. (1995). Multiple regimes and cross-country growth behaviour. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 10(4), 365–384....
  • Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations. Long Range Planning (Vol. 31).
  • Emory, C. W., & Cooper, D. R. (1991). Business research methods. Boston: IRWIN, 4 edition.
  • Fagerberg, J. (1994). Technology and international differences in growth rates. Journal of Economic Literature. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2728605
  • Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2002). Technology-gaps, innovation-diffusion and transformation: an evolutionary interpretation. Research...
  • Fagerberg, J., Srholec, M., & Knell, M. (2007). The Competitiveness of Nations: Why Some Countries Prosper While Others Fall Behind. World...
  • Field, a. (2005). Factor analysis using SPSS. Retrieved December, 8057, 1–14.
  • Filippetti, A., & Peyrache, A. (2011). The Patterns of Technological Capabilities of Countries: A Dual Approach using Composite Indicators...
  • Freeman, C. (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lesson from Japan. Pinter, London, UK.
  • Freeman, C. (2004). Technological infrastructure and international competitiveness. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(3), 541–569 https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth022
  • Furman, J. L., & Hayes, R. (2004). Catching up or standing still? National innovative productivity among “follower” countries, 1978-1999....
  • Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(2002), 899–933....
  • Galor, O., & Weil, D. N. (2000). Population, Technology, and Growth: From Maithusian Stagnation to the Demographic Transition and Beyond....
  • Hall, C. J., Jordaan, A., & Frisk, M. G. (2010). The historic influence of dams on diadromous fish habitat with a focus on river herring...
  • Howitt, P. (2000). Endogenous Growth and Cross-Country Income Differences. The American Economic Review, 90(4), 829–846. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.4.829
  • Howitt, P., & Mayer-Foulkes, D. (2005). R&D, implementation, and stagnation: A schumpeterian theory of convergence clubs. Journal...
  • Hu, M.-C., & Mathews, J. A. (2005). National innovative capacity in East Asia. Research Policy, 34(9), 1322–1349 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.04.009
  • Huang, W., & Eling, M. (2013). An efficiency comparison of the non-life insurance industry in the BRIC countries. European Journal of...
  • Lee, K., & Kim, B. Y. (2009). Both Institutions and Policies Matter but Differently for Different Income Groups of Countries: Determinants...
  • Lundvall, B. A. (2007). National Innovation Systems - Analytical Concept and Development Tool. Industry & Innovation, 14(1), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710601130863
  • Nasierowski, W., & Arcelus, F. J. (1999). Interrelationships among the elements of national innovation systems: a statistical evaluation....
  • Nelson, R. R., & Nelson, K. (2002). Technology , institutions , and innovation systems, Research Policy, 31(2), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00140-8
  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1977). In search of useful theory of innovation. Research Policy, 6(1), 36–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(77)90029-4
  • Nilsson, M. (2011). Policy coordination in systems of innovation : A structural-functional analysis of regional industry support in Sweden.
  • Niosi, J., Saviotti, P., Bellon, B., & Crow, M. (1993). National systems of innovation: in search of a workable concept. Technology in...
  • Porter and Stern. (2001). Innovation: Location Matters. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(4):28-36.
  • Porter, M and Stern, S. (. (1999). The New Challenge to America’s Prosperity: Finding from the Innovation Index, Council on Competitiveness,...
  • Radosevic, S. (1998). The Transformation of National Systems of Innovation in Eastern Europe: Between Restructuring and Erosion. Industrial...
  • Rao-Nicholson, R., Vorley, T., & Khan, Z. (2017). Social innovation in emerging economies: A national systems of innovation based approach....
  • Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2003). Research Methods for Business Students. Chapter 4: Understanding research philosophy...
  • Scerri, M., Clara Couto Soares, M., & Maharajh, R. (2010). Comparative report on innovation systems and inequality in the BRICS. From...
  • Sharif, N. (2006). Emergence and development of the National Innovation Systems concept. Research Policy, 35(5), 745–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.001
  • Smith, E. (2008). Using Secondary Data in Educational and Social Research, 249.
  • Song, M. L., Zhang, L. L., Liu, W., & Fisher, R. (2013). Bootstrap-DEA analysis of BRICS’ energy efficiency based on small sample data....
  • Suarez-Villa, L. (1990). Inventions, inventive learning and innovative capacity. Behavioral Science, 35(4), 290–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830350404
  • Tu, C. J., Chang, M. C., & Chen, C. P. (2016). Progressive time-weighted dynamic energy efficiency, energy decoupling rate, and decarbonization:...
  • Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M., Aparicio, J., Ortiz, L., Carayannis, E. G., & Grigoroudis, E. (2020). The productivity of national innovation...
  • Zaichenko, S. (2014). National innovation system and inequality in Russia. In Inequality and development challenges, (pp.80–148) Routledge....