Acceso usuarios
Luis Castillo Córdova
De la mano del derecho fundamental a la vida del concebido se muestra la an-tinomia que surge entre dos normas constitucionales, una de origen nacional creada por elTribunal Constitucional peruano y otra de origen convencional creada por la Corte IDH, queconforman el contenido constitucional del mencionado derecho fundamental. Planteada laantinomia se propone solucionarla desde las bases dogmáticas propias del Estado constitucio-nal de derecho, que proscriben que la solución exclusivamente se sostenga en razones de auto-ridad. Así, se resuelve no desde una relación de supremacía del derecho convencional sobre elnacional, sino desde una efectiva relación de complementariedad, para el logro efectivo de laplena realización de las personas a través de la plena vigencia de los derechos humanos. Unatal solución representa, a la vez, límites razonables al control de convencionalidad en manos dela Corte IDH y promueve un efectivo diálogo entre esta y las cortes nacionales de justicia.
Considering the fundamental right to life of the conceived, this paper shows the antinomy that arises between two constitutional norms: a domestic norm created by the Peru-vian Constitutional Court, and an international norm created by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Both norms made up the constitutional content of the fundamental right to life. Once the antinomy has been raised, it is proposed to solve it from the dogmatic bases of the constitutional State of law, which prohibits that the solution be exclusively sustained on reasons of authority. Thus, it is justified to resolve it not from a relationship of supremacy of the conventional law over the domestic, but from an effective relationship of complementarity for the effective achievement of the full realization of the people through the full enforcement of the human rights. Such a solution represents, at the same time, reasonable limits to the control of conventionality in the hands of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and promotes an effective dialogue between it and the national courts of justice.
