COVID-19 en América Latina: estrategias discursivas comparadas en sistemas presidenciales

• Jorge Resina de la Fuente ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidad Complutense de Madrid

     Universidad Complutense de Madrid

     Madrid, España

     
• Localización: América latina hoy: Revista de ciencias sociales, ISSN 1130-2887, VOL. 89, 2021, págs. 105-125
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.14201/alh.26419
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Covid-19 na América Latina: estratégias discursivas comparadas em sistemas presidenciais
  • COVID-19 in Latin America: comparing discursive strategies in presidential systems
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Dialnet Métricas: 1 Cita
• Resumen
  • español

    Este artículo estudia los marcos interpretativos utilizados por los presidentes de Argentina, Brasil, Chile y México durante los meses iniciales del COVID-19, con el objetivo de caracterizar y comparar estrategias discursivas, así como explorar qué factores explican las distintas aproximaciones. La conclusión preliminar es que las diferencias se deben tanto a razones ideológicas como a otros factores contextuales y de disponibilidad de recursos.

  • English

    This article studies the interpretative frames used by the presidents of Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Mexico during the initial months of COVID-19, with the aim of characterizing and comparing discursive strategies as well as exploring what factors explain the different approaches. Our conclusion is that the differences are due both as much to ideological factors as to contextual factors and the availability of resources.

  • português

    Como lidar com uma pandemia? Este artigo estuda as estruturas interpretativas utilizadas pelos presidentes da Argentina, Brasil, Chile e México para explicar Covid-19, com o objetivo de caracterizar e comparar estratégias discursivas. Para tanto, foram identificadas três dimensões de análise: a concepção de Estado, a representação das lideranças e os princípios normativos promovidos. A conclusão é que as diferenças se devem tanto a fatores ideológicos quanto à disponibilidade de recursos.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Alarcón, V. (2004). Reflexiones sobre el debate entre liberalismo y comunitarismo. Iztapalapa. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades,...
  • Benoit, W. L. y Henson, J. R. (2009). President Bush’s image repair discourse on Hurricane Katrina. Public Relations Review, 35(1), 40-16....
  • Benziman, Y. (2020). «Winning» the «Battle» and «Beating» the COVID-19 «Enemy»: Leaders’ Use of War Frames to Define the Pandemic. Peace and...
  • Birn, A. (2020). How to have narrative?flipping history in a pandemic: Views of/from Latin America. Centaurus, 62(2), 354-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/1600-0498.12310
  • Blondel, J. (1987). Political Leadership: Towards a General Analysis. SAGE.
  • Boin, A., Hart, P. y McConnell, A. (2009). Crisis exploitation: political and policy impacts of framing contests. Journal of European Public...
  • Bol, D., Giani, M., Blais, A. y Loewen, P. J. (2021). The effect of COVID?19 lockdowns on political support: Some good news for democracy?...
  • Bucchi, M. y Trench, B. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. Routledge.
  • Carney, T. y Bennett, B. (2014). Framing pandemic management: New governance, science or culture? Health Sociology Review, 23(2), 136-147....
  • Chong, D. y Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103-126. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
  • Daviter, F. (2007). Policy framing in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(4), 654-666. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760701314474
  • Edelman, D. (2020). 2020 Edelman Trust Barometer Spring Update: Trust and the Coronavirus. Daniel J. Edelman Holdings, Inc. Disponible en:...
  • Eising, R., Rasch, D. y Rozbicka, P. (2015). Institutions, policies, and arguments: context and strategy in EU policy framing. Journal of...
  • Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harvard University Press.
  • Gollust, S. E., Nagler, R. H. y Fowler, E. F. (2020). The emergence of COVID-19 in the US: A Public Health and Political Communication Crisis....
  • Hay, C. (1996). Narrating crisis: The Discursive Construction of the Winter of Discontent. Sociology, 30(2), 253-277. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0038038596030002004
  • Lewis, H. (2020, mayo 6). The Pandemic Has Revealed the Weakness of Strongmen. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2020/05/new-zealand-germany-women-leadership-...
  • Jaworska, S. (2021). Competence and collectivity: The discourse of Angela Merkel’s media communications during the first wave of the pandemic....
  • Johnston, H. (1996). Social Movements and Culture. Routledge.
  • Johnston, H. (2002). Verification and Proof in Frame and Discourse Analysis. En B. Klandermans y S. Staggenborg (Eds.), Methods of Social...
  • Kamradt-Scott, A. y McInnes, C. (2012). The securitisation of pandemic influenza: Framing, security and public policy. Global Public Health,...
  • Kornprobst, M. (2017). Framing, resonance and war: Foregrounds and backgrounds of cultural congruence. European Journal of International Relations,...
  • Laffan, B. (2014). Framing the crisis, defining the problems: Decoding the Euro Area Crisis. Perspectives on European Politics and Society,...
  • Martin?Howard, S. y Farmbry, K. (2020). Framing a Needed Discourse on Health Disparities and Social Inequities: Drawing Lessons from a Pandemic....
  • McAllister, I. (2007). The Personalization of Politics. En R. J. Dalton y H. D. Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior...
  • Natanson, J. (2020). Argentina, el virus y el presidente. Nueva Sociedad, 287, 60-67. https://nuso.org/articulo/argentina-el-virus-y-el-presidente/
  • Olvera, A. J. (2020). De la elección plebiscitaria al populismo nostálgico. López Obrador y la «Cuarta Transformación» en México. En Y. Murakami...
  • Page, B. I., Shapiro, R. Y. y Dempsey, G. R. (1987). What moves public opinion? The American Political Science Review, 81(1), 23-43. https://doi.org/10.2307/1960777
  • Pérez, J. M., Marín, C. y Cervi, L. (2021). Pandemia y guerra: narrativas de crisis y liderazgo. Análisis de las estrategias discursivas presidenciales...
  • Quiroga, M. M. (2020). Estallido social en Chile 2019: participación, representación, confianza institucional y escándalos públicos. Análisis...
  • Resina, J. y Lendo, T. (2016). Communicating public security crisis in Mexico: A comparison between Felipe Calderón and Enrique Peña Nieto....
  • Sanahuja, J. A. y López, C. (2020). Las derechas neopatriotas en América Latina: contestación al orden liberal internacional. Revista CIDOB...
  • Snow, D. A. (2004). Framing Processes, Ideology, and Discursive Fields. En D. A., Snow, S. A. Soule y H. Kriesi, The Blackwell Companion to...
  • Snow, D. A. y Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197-217....
  • Strauss, A. y Corbin, J. (2016). Bases de la investigación cualitativa: técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada....
  • Ventura, S. (2021). La gestione della crisi e il meaning-making. Narrazione e manipolazione nelle conferenze stampa di Giuseppe Conte durante...
  • Verloo, M. y Lombardo, E. (2007). Contested Gender Equality and Policy Variety in Europe: Introducing a Critical Frame Analysis Approach....
  • Verón, E. (1987). La palabra adversativa. Observaciones sobre la enunciación política. En E. Verón, L. Arufch, y M. Chirico (Eds.), El discurso...
  • Vink, M. J., Boezeman, D., Dewulf, A. y Termeer, C. J. (2013). Changing climate, changing frames: Dutch water policy frame developments in...
  • Zaller, J. R. (2014). La naturaleza y los orígenes de la opinión pública. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.