Acceso usuarios
In the aftermath of the Court’s judgments in Dano and Alimanovic, there remained considerable uncertainty about the interplay between the equal treatment guarantees vested in Union citizens by arts 18, 21 and 45 TFEU and the different legislative measures adopted to give effect to these Treaty provisions. In this context, this article seeks to cast some light on the rather ambiguous relationship between Directive 2004/38 and Regulation 492/2011. It is essentially suggested that the limitations on the right of equal treatment featured in art.24(2) of the Citizenship Directive cannot be relied upon as such in order to circumscribe the equal treatment guarantees conferred upon “workers” by art.7(2) of the Workers’ Regulation. At the same time, though, it would appear that the Court has accepted—albeit somewhat implicitly— that the Member States may effectively restrict migrant workers’ equality rights on the basis of integration requirements inspired to some extent by the requirements expressed in the Directive.
