When Should the People Decide? Public Support for Direct Democracy in Australia

• Kildea, Paul ^[2] ; Brown, A J ^[1] ; Deem, Jacob ^[3]
  1. [1] Griffith University

     Griffith University

     Australia

     
  2. [2] Faculty of Law, University of New South Wales, Sydney
  3. [3] Schoolof Business and Law, CQ University, Brisbane

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: Parliamentary affairs: A journal of representative politics, ISSN 0031-2290, Vol. 74, Nº 4, 2021, págs. 911-942
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.1093/pa/gsaa019
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • This article examines the strength of support for direct democracy among Australian citizens, both in general and, in a world-first, across different specific topics. Analysing data from the Australian Constitutional Values Survey, we investigate whether that support is higher among people who are more educated and politically interested (in line with a ‘cognitive mobilisation’ hypothesis) or those who are dissatisfied with politics, with low levels of political trust (‘political disaffection’). The article finds that Australians widely support the use of direct democracy, but especially with respect to constitutional issues and matters of principle that they feel they can readily engage with, whereas parliaments are still seen as best placed to decide more technical matters. The article also finds that support for direct democracy is strongest among politically disaffected citizens, in ways that suggest greater use of direct democracy may have a role to play in addressing decline in political trust in Australia.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Anderson, (2010), Electoral Studies, 29, pp. 227, 10.1016/j.electstud.2009.12.004
  • Bengtsson, (2009), West European Politics, 32, pp. 1031, 10.1080/01402380903065256
  • Bjørklund, (2009), Referendums and Representative Democracy: Responsiveness, Accountability and Deliberation, pp. 117
  • Bowler, (2007), Political Research Quarterly, 60, pp. 351, 10.1177/1065912907304108
  • Brown, (2016), Federal Law Review, 44, pp. 143, 10.1177/0067205X1604400106
  • Bruerton, (2017), A People’s Federation
  • Butler, (1994), Referendums around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy, 10.1007/978-1-349-25646-4
  • Clarke, (1996), Absent Mandate: Canadian Electoral Politics in an Era of Restructuring
  • Coffé, (2014), Electoral Studies, 35, pp. 1, 10.1016/j.electstud.2014.03.006
  • Craven, (2004), Conversations with the Constitution: Not Just a Piece of Paper
  • Dalton, (2004), Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268436.001.0001
  • Dalton, (2001), Journal of Democracy, 12, pp. 141, 10.1353/jod.2001.0066
  • Gilljam, (1998), To Join or Not to Join: Three Nordic Referendums on Membership in the European Union, pp. 284
  • Hetherington, (2008), The Journal of Politics, 70, pp. 498, 10.1017/S0022381608080468
  • McAllister, (2011), The Australian Voter: 50 Years of Change
  • McAllister, (2018), Australian Journal of Political Science, 53, pp. 409, 10.1080/10361146.2018.1504877
  • Norris, (1999), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, 10.1093/0198295685.001.0001
  • Orr, (2000), Public Law Review, pp. 117
  • Reidy, (2015), Electoral Studies, 38, pp. 159, 10.1016/j.electstud.2015.02.011
  • Schuck, (2015), Electoral Studies, 38, pp. 149, 10.1016/j.electstud.2015.02.012
  • Svensson, (2017), The Routledge Handbook to Referendums and Direct Democracy, pp. 91
  • Tierney, (2012), Constitutional Referendums: The Theory and Practice of Republican Deliberation, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592791.001.0001
  • van Ham, (2017), Myth and Reality of the Legitimacy Crisis: Explaining Trends and Cross-National Differences in Established Democracies, 10.1093/oso/9780198793717.001.0001
  • Williams, (2010), People Power: The History and Future of the Referendum in Australia
  • Yu, (2017), Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation, 46, pp. 6261, 10.1080/03610918.2016.1202271