Questioning scrutiny: the effect of Prime Minister’s Questions on citizen efficacy and trust in parliament

• Convery, Alan ^[1] ; Haines, Pavielle ^[2] ; Mitchell, James ^[1] ; Parker, David C. W. ^[3]
  1. [1] University of Edinburgh

     University of Edinburgh

     Reino Unido

     
  2. [2] Rollins College

     Rollins College

     Estados Unidos

     
  3. [3] Montana State University

     Montana State University

     Estados Unidos

     

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: The Journal of legislative studies, ISSN 1357-2334, Vol. 27, Nº. 2, 2021, págs. 207-226
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.1080/13572334.2020.1850010
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Dialnet Métricas: 1 Cita
• Resumen

  • In most democratic regimes, the public often dislikes and distrusts parliamentarians. This should not surprise: the public likes neither compromise nor conflict, both of which are legislative hallmarks. One of the most famous examples of parliamentary conflict is Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) in the British House of Commons. It is the most viewed and commented upon part of the parliamentary week, but attracts strong criticism as a noisy charade promoting a poor image of politics. Does PMQs undermine individual levels of political efficacy and trust in Parliament, as some commentators suggest? We use an experimental design to answer this question and find evidence to suggest that, contrary to its negative reputation, PMQs does not adversely affect most citizens’ perceptions.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • BBC. (2015, January 18). Pienaar’s politics. Radio 5 Live.
  • Bercow, J. (2010, September 15). Speech to the centre for parliamentary studies. Viewed July 18, 2019, https://www.parliament.uk/business/commons/the-speaker/speeches/speeches/speech-to-the-centre-for-parliamentary-studies/
  • Blair T., (2010), A journey
  • Blake R. R., (1964), The managerial grid
  • Bull P., (2020), Parliamentary Affairs, 73, pp. 429
  • Crewe E., (2015), The House of Commons: An anthropology of MPs at work
  • Franklin M. N., (1993), Parliamentary questions
  • Gallup. (2019). Confidence in institutions. Viewed July 29, 2019. https://news.gallup.com/poll/1597/
  • Hansard Society. (2014). Tuned in or turned off? Public attitudes to Prime Minister’s Questions. Viewed March 8, 2017. https://assets.ctfassets.net/u1rlvvbs33ri/v5KOp60C6Os0y2MYiMYyg/da0ce4465c346bb592fde93de3550b3c/Publication__Tuned-in-or-Turned-off-Public-attitudes-to-PMQs.pdf
  • Hansard Society. (2019). Audit of political engagement. Viewed July 30, 2019. https://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/publications/reports/audit-of-political-engagement-16
  • Hazarika A., (2018), Punch & Judy politics: An insider’s guide to Prime Minister’s Questions
  • The Independent. (2018). ‘Abolish the thing!’ Chuka Umunna says ‘completely useless’ PMQs tradition should be scrapped. Retrieved December...
  • Institute for Government. (2015). Parliamentary scrutiny of government. Retrieved August 8, 2019, from https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publications/parliamentary-scrutiny-government
  • Lowenberg G., (1971), Modern parliaments: Change or decline?
  • Norris P., (2013), Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited
  • Norris P., (2017), HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP17-012
  • Norton P., (1993), Parliamentary questions, pp. 194
  • Rahim M. A., (2010), Managing conflict in organization
  • Schattschneider E. E., (1942), Party government
  • Thomas K., (1974), Thomas-Killman conflict mode instrument