The Discourse of Anti-Instrumentalism: Exploring a Conceptual Model Through the Case Study of the We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own Initiative

• Autores: Irena Fiket, Marjan Ivkovic, Gazela Pudar Draško, Jelena Vasiljević
• Localización: Partecipazione e conflitto, ISSN-e 2035-6609, Vol. 12, Nº. 3, 2019 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Special Issue on: Working as a platform: Labour needs, activation and representativeness in the era of digital transformation), págs. 898-918
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • The main focus of our paper is on a specific form of democratic discourse, used in different types of social engagement actions (petitions, speeches, intellectual engagement, ad hoc citizens' protests, social movements etc.), that attempts to politicize a certain issue by challenging the neoliberal principle of instrumentalism which argues that democratic procedures can legitimately be abandoned in the name of the greater efficiency of socio-economic development. Therefore, we start from identifying the discourse of "neoliberal instrumentalism" and its relative success in delegitimizing the welfare state and mechanisms of democratic decision making and we formulate a conceptual model of a democratic counter-narrative named "anti-instrumentalist discourse". Through empirical analyses of discourse used by We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, that mobilized against the Serbian government's urban project Belgrade Wa-terfront we try to illustrate the applicability and the heuristic value of the proposed model. The data for the analyses were collected through 1) desk analysis of available secondary data on the Belgrade Waterfront project, 2) official statements and proclamations of the We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, 3) semi-structured interviews with four core members of the initiative

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Bobbio, L. (2010), “Il dibattito pubblico sulle grandi opere. Il caso dell’autostrada di Genova”, Rivista italiana di politiche pubbliche,...
  • Bobbio, L. (2012), “Non proprio politica. Non proprio tecnica. La terza via della democrazia deliberativa”, Paper presentato al Convegno nazionale...
  • Boltanski, L. and E. Chiapello (2007), The New Spirit of Capitalism, London: Verso.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1998), Acts of Resistance: Against the Tyranny of the Market, New York: The New Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. and L. Wacquant (2001), “New-Liberal Speak: Notes on the New Planetary Vulgate”, Radical Philosophy, 105: 2-5.
  • Brown, W. (2018), “Neoliberalism's Frankenstein: Authoritarian Freedom in Twenty-First Century ‘Democracies'”, Critical Times, 1 (1):...
  • Della Porta, D. (2013), Can Democracy be Saved?, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Della Porta, D. and M. Diani (2006), Social Movements: An Introduction, Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Della Porta, D. and D. Rucht (eds. 2013), Meeting democracy: power and deliberation in global justice movements, Cambridge: Cambridge University...
  • Di Mauro, D. and I. Fiket (2017), “Debating Europe, transforming identities: Assessing the impact of deliberative poll treatment on identity”,...
  • Eagle Hills (2015), Government of republic of Serbia and Eagle Hills sign joint venture agreement for Belgrade waterfront, accessed June 20,...
  • (http://www.eaglehills.com/releases/press-releases/y15-11-government-of-republic-of-serbia-and-eagle-hills-sign-joint-venture-for-belgrade-waterfront).
  • Fairclough, N. (2005), “Neoliberalism: A Discourse-Analytical Perspective”, Proceedings of Conference on British and American Studies, Editura...
  • Ferrara, A. (2014), The Democratic Horizon. Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Floridia, A. (2013), La democrazia deliberativa: teorie, processi e sistemi, Roma: Carocci.
  • Fung, A. (2003), “Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences”, Journal of Political Philosophy,...
  • Gastil, J., L. Black, and K. Moscovitz (2008), “Ideology, Attitude Change, and Deliberation in Small Face-to-Face Group”, Political Communication,...
  • Geissel B., and M. Joas (eds. 2013), Participatory Democratic Innovations in Europe: Improving the Quality of Democracy?, Opladen: Barbara...
  • Goodin, R. and J. S. Dryzek (2006), “Deliberative Impacts: The Macro-Political Uptake of Mini-Publics”, Politics & Society, 34(2): 219-44.
  • Government of Republic of Serbia, (2014), Belgrade Waterfront to turn Serbia’s capital into centre of region, Acessed June 20, 2017. (www.srbija.gov.rs/vesti/vest.php?id=102121&change_lang=en).
  • Guidry, J. A. (2003), “The Struggle to Be Seen: Social Movements and the Public Sphere in Brazil”, International Journal of Politics, Culture,...
  • Jacobsson, K. (ed. 2015), Urban grassroots movements in Central and Eastern Europe, Farnham: Ashgate.
  • Jezierska, K. and D. Polanska (2017) “Social Movements Seen as Radical Political Actors: The Case of the Polish Tenants’ Movement”, International...
  • Johnston, H., E. Laraña, and J. Gusfield (eds. 1994), New Social Movements: From Ideology to Identity, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Karpowitz, C. and C. Raphael (2014), Deliberation, Democracy, and Civic Forums: Improving Equality and Publicity, Cambridge: Cambridge University...
  • Lalović, K., U. Radosavljević, and Z. Đukanović (2015), “Reframing public interest in the implementation of large urban projects in Serbia:...
  • Luhmann, N. (1995), Social Systems, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Matković, A., M. Ivković (2018), “Neoliberal Instrumentalism and the Fight Against it: Serbia's austerity and the ‘We Won't Let Belgrade...
  • McCluskey, M. (2003), “Efficiency and Social Citizenship: Challenging the Neoliberal Attack on the Welfare State”, Indiana Law Journal, 78:...
  • Merkel, W., S. Kneip (eds. 2018), Democracy and Crisis: Challenges in Turbulent Times, Springer International Publishing.
  • Ne da(vi)mo Beograd (2015a), “Ne da(vi)mo Beograd!”, printed
  • bulletin from the archives of the NDBGD.
  • Ne da(vi)mo Beograd (2015b), “Stambena pljačka u vreme
  • globalne krize i evropske bitke za stanovanje”, printed bulletin from the archives of the NDBGD.
  • Ne da(vi)mo Beograd (2016), “Nema straha, nema predaje! Vidimo se 29.09. u 18h!”, Assessed June 20, 2017. (https://nedavimobeograd.wordpress.com/2016/09/22/nema-straha-nema-predaje-vidimo-se-29-09-u-18h/).
  • Ne da(vi)mo Beograd, (2015), Assessed June 20, 2017 (https://nedavimobeograd.wordpress.com/o-inicijativi/)
  • Neblo, M.A. (2015), Deliberative Democracy Between Theory and Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nicholls, W.J. (2008), “The Urban Question Revisited: The Importance of Cities for Social Movements”, International Journal of Urban and Regional...
  • Parkinson, J. (2003), “Legitimacy Problems in Deliberative Democracy”, Political Studies, 51(1): 180–196.
  • Parkinson, J. and J. Mansbridge (2012), Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Polanyi, K. (2001 [1944]), The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of our Time, Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Radio Television Serbia (Радио Телевизија Србије, 2015), “Postavljen kamen temeljac za Beograd na vodi”, accessed 13.12.2018.
  • (http://www.rts.rs/page/stories/sr/story/13/ekonomija/2051834/postavljen-kamen-temeljac-za-beograd-na-vodi.html).
  • Rossi, F. and D. della Porta (2009), “Social Movement, Trade Unions and Advocacy Networks”, in C. W. Haerpfer, et al. (eds.), Democratization,...
  • Sekretarijat za urbanizam i gradjevinske-poslove (2015), “Odgovor Sekretarijata za urbanizam i gradjevinske poslove na nacrt izmena i dopuna...
  • Springer, S. (2016), The Discourse of Neoliberalism, London: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Zaharijević, A. and J. Vasiljević (eds. 2017), Angažman. Uvod u studije angažovanosti [Engagement. Introduction to Social Engagement Studies],...
  • Zakon o utvrđivanju javnog interesa i posebnim postupcima eksproprijacije i izdavanja građevinske dozvole radi realizacije projekta “Beograd...