Can Kant’s Aesthetics Accommodate Conceptual Art? A Reply to Costello

• Ioannis Trisokkas ^[1]
  1. [1] National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

     National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

     Dimos Athens, Grecia

     
• Localización: Con-textos Kantianos: International Journal of Philosophy, ISSN-e 2386-7655, Nº. 12, 2020 (Ejemplar dedicado a: La teoría estética de Kant), págs. 226-247
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen

  • Diarmuid Costello has recently argued that, contra received opinion, Kant’s aesthetics can accommodate conceptual art, as well as all other art. Costello offers an interpretation of Kant’s art theory that demands from all art a minimal structure involving three basic “players” (the artist, the artwork, the artwork’s recipient) and three basic “actions” corresponding to those “players.” The article takes issue with the “action” assigned by Costello’s Kant to the artwork’s recipient, namely that her imagination generates a multitude of playful thoughts deriving from or in any other way relating to the concept or idea that the artist has instilled in the artwork and that the artwork transmits to the recipient. It is argued that the “proper” recipient of conceptual art may very well have a multitude of thoughts that are all irrelevant to the concept or idea the artist has instilled in the artwork, even if the artwork has transmitted that concept or idea to the recipient. This shows that Kant’s art theory, as presented by Costello, cannot accommodate conceptual art. I conclude by suggesting that either one of two amendments to the theory’s account of the recipient’s experience could enable it to accommodate conceptual art.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Alberro, A. and Stimson, B. (1999), Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Bochner, M. (1967), “The Serial Attitude,” in Alberro and Stimson (1999), pp. 22-27. Boudaille, G. (1968), “Interview with Daniel Buren,”...
  • Cohen, H. (2018) “A Million Millennial Medicis,” in Explorations in Art and Technology, ed. L. Candy, E. Edmonds, and F. Poltronieri, London,...
  • Costa, E., Escari, R., and Jacoby, R. (1967), “A Media Art (Manifesto),” in Happenings, ed. O. Masotta, Jorge Alvarez, Bueno Aires, pp. 119-122.
  • Costello, D. (2007), “Kant after Lewitt: Towards an Aesthetics of Conceptual Art,” in Goldie and Schellekens (2007), pp. 92-105.
  • Costello, D. (2009), “Retrieving Kant’s Aesthetics for Art Theory After Greenberg,” in Halsall et al. (2009), pp. 117-132.
  • Goldie, P. and Schellekens, E. (eds.) (2007), Philosophy and Conceptual Art, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  • Greenberg, C. (1986-1993), The Collected Essays and Criticism, vols. I-IV, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
  • Greenberg, C. (1999), Homemade Esthetics: Observations on Art and Taste, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Guyer, P. (2006), ‘The Harmony of the Faculties Revisited,” in Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy, ed. R. Kukla, Cambridge...
  • Halsall, F., Jansen, J., and O’Connor, T. (eds.) (2009), Rediscovering Aesthetics, Columbia University Press, New York, NY.
  • Kant, I. (1790), Critique of Judgement, trans. W. S. Pluhar, Hackett, Indianapolis, 1987. Lewitt, S. (1967), “Paragraphs on Conceptual Art,”...
  • Oiticica, H. (1966), “Position and Program,” in Alberro and Stimson (1999), pp. 8-10. Oiticica, H. (1967), “General Scheme of the New Objectivity,”...
  • Piper, A. (1967), “A Defense of the ‘Conceptual’ Process in Art,” in A. Piper, Out of Order, Out of Sight, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996,...
  • Schellekens, E. (2017), “Conceptual Art,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  • Reinhardt, A. (1953), “Twelve Rules for a New Academy,” ArtNews 56, no. 3 (May 1957), pp. 37-38.
  • Reinhardt, A. (1962), “Art as Art,” Art International 6, no. 10 (December 1962). Rogerson, K. F. (2008), The Problem of Free Harmony in Kant’s...
  • Wood, A. W. (2005), Kant, Blackwell, Malden, MA. Wood, P. (2002), Conceptual Art, Tate Publishing, London.