Diritti dei lavoratori e catene globali del valore: un formante giurisprudenziale in via di definizione?

• Autores: Vania Brino
• Localización: Giornale di diritto del lavoro e di relazioni industriali, ISSN 1720-4321, Vol. 42, Nº. 3, 167, 2020, págs. 451-470
• Idioma: italiano
• DOI: 10.3280/GDL2020-167001
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Labour rights and global value chains: the recent jurisprudence challenges
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Dialnet Métricas: 10 Citas
• Resumen
  • English

    The paper, starting from the difficulty of providing effective remedial tools in the hypotheses of violation of the fundamental rights of workers in the global value chains, argue the thesis of the necessary expansion of the scope of the duty of care to overcome the constraints imposed by the territoriality of the law and the corporate veil. The Author report the recent jurisprudential developments in the common and civil law systems as a demonstration of a tendential openness of interpretation, looking to the recent European legislation as a potential key to accessing a wider possibility of judicial protection of the violations.

  • italiano

    Il saggio, muovendo dalla difficoltà di prevedere strumenti rimediali efficaci nelle ipotesi di violazione dei diritti fondamentali dei lavoratori nelle catene globali del valore, sostiene la tesi della necessaria introduzione di meccanismi dotati di implicazioni extraterritoriali al fine di su-perare i vincoli imposti dalla territorialità della legge e dal dogma della personalità giuridica separata delle imprese. L’Autrice riprende alcune pronunce che, intervenute sia su profili di diritto sostanziale che processuale, concorrono a definire nuovi percorsi interpretativi promuo-vendo una più ampia giustiziabilità dei diritti.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Alvarez J.J., Yiannibas K. (2017). Human Rights in Business: Removal of Barriers to Access to Justice in the European Union. London: Routledge.
  • Augenstein D., Jagers N. (2017). Access to justice in the European Union for corporate-related human rights violations: jurisdictional issues....
  • Barcellona P., Camardi C. (2002). Le istituzioni del diritto privato contemporaneo. Napoli: Jovene.
  • Bright C. (2015). L’esercizio extraterritoriale della giurisdizione civile con riferimento alle gravi violazioni dei diritti umani da parte...
  • Brino V. (2020). Diritto del lavoro e catene globali del valore. La regolazione dei rapporti di lavoro tra globalizzazione e localismi. Torino:...
  • Cassel D. (2016). Outlining the Case for a Common Law Duty of Care of Business to Exercise Human Rights Due Diligence. BHRJ, 1(2): 179 ss.
  • Conway M. (2015). A New Duty of Care? Tort Liability from Voluntary Human Rights Due Diligence in Global Supply Chains. QLJ, 40: 741 ss.
  • Cortese B. (2014). Piercing the corporate veil in EU competition law: the parent subsidiary relationship and antitrust liability. In: B. Cortese,...
  • Croser M., Day M., Van Huijstee M., Samkalden C. (2020). Vedanta v. Lungowe and Kiobel v. Shell: The Implications for Parent Company Accountability....
  • Demeyere S. (2015). Liability of a mother company for its subsidiary in French, Belgian and English law. ERPL, 3: 413 ss.
  • Diggs E.G., Regan M.C., Parance B. (2019). Business and Human Rights as a Galaxy of Norms. GJIL, 50: 309 ss.
  • Enneking L. (2009). Crossing the Atlantic – The Political and Legal Feasibility of European Foreign Direct Liability Cases. GWILR, 4: 903...
  • Enneking L. (2014). The Future of Foreign Direct Liability? Exploring the International Relevance of the Dutch Shell Nigeria Case. ULR, 10(1):...
  • Enneking L.F.H. (2018). Judicial remedies: The issue of applicable law. In: Alvarez Rubio J.J., Yannibas K., eds., Human Rights in Business:...
  • Farjat G. (2004). Pour un droit économique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  • Farrell N. (2013). Accountability for Outsourced Torts: Expanding Brands’ Duty of Care for Workplace Harms Committed Abroad. GJIL, 44: 1491...
  • Ferrarese M.R. (2006). Diritto sconfinato. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  • Galgano F. (2000). La categoria del contratto alle soglie del terzo millennio. CI: 919 ss.
  • Gereffi G., Humphrey J., Sturgeon T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. RIPE, 12(1): 86 ss.
  • Goldhaber M.D. (2013). Corporate Human Rights Litigation in Non-U.S. Courts: A Comparative Scorecard. UCILR, 3: 127 ss.
  • Goudkamp J. (2017). Duties of care and corporate groups. LQR, 133: 3 ss.
  • Guarriello F., Nogler L. (2020). Violazioni extraterritoriali dei diritti umani sul lavoro: un itinerario di ricerca tra rimedi nazionali...
  • Muir Watt H. (2010). L’esclavage moderne et la compétence universelle: réflexions sur l’Alien Tort Statute. In: Moreau M.A., Muir Watt H.,...
  • Kaufmann C. (2016). Holding Multinational Corporations Accountable for Human Rights Violations: Litigation outside the United States. In:...
  • Maryanov C.D. (2011). Sweatshop Liability: Corporate codes of conduct and the governance of labor standards in the international supply chain....
  • Meron T. (2006). The Humanization of International Law. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  • Mijares Peña S.C. (2014). Human Rights Violations by Canadian Companies Abroad: Choc V Hudbay Minerals Inc. WJLS, 5(1): 5 ss.
  • Munerati L.R. (2018). The Zara case in Brazil: juridical effectiveness of soft law measures concerning decent work in global supply chains....
  • Palombo D. (2019). Business and Human Rights. The Obligations of the European Home State. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  • Palombo D. (2019). The duty of care of the parent company: a comparison between French law, UK precedents and the Swiss proposals. BHRJ, 4:...
  • Perulli A. (1999). Diritto del lavoro e globalizzazione. Clausole sociali, codici di condotta e commercio internazionale. Padova: Cedam.
  • Perulli A., Marrella F. (2009). Manifesto di Venezia sulla globalizzazione. RIDL: 341 ss.
  • Petrin M. (2013). Assumption of Responsibility in Corporate Groups: Chandler v Cape plc. MLR, 76(3): 604 ss.
  • Phillips J., Lim S.J. (2009). Their Brothers’ Keeper: Global Buyers and the Legal Duty to Protect Suppliers’ Employees. RLR, 61: 333 ss.
  • Queinnec Y. (2007). Supply chain liability. Legal tools for parent company’s accountability. Sherpa working document: 1 ss.
  • Reinke B., Zumbansen P. (2019). Transnational Liability Regimes in Contract, Tort and Corporate Law: Comparative Observations on “Global Supply...
  • Revak H. (2012). Corporate Codes of Conduct: Binding Contract or Ideal Publicity?. HLJ, 63: 1662 ss.
  • Rott P., Ulfbeck V. (2015). Supply Chain liability of multinational corporations?. ERPL, 3: 415 ss.
  • Sanger A. (2012). Crossing the Corporate Veil: The Duty of Care Owed by a Parent Company to the Employees of its Subsidiary. CLJ, 71(3): 478...
  • Shapiro D. (2011). Kiobel and Corporate Immunity Under the Alien Tort Statute: The struggle for Clarity Post-Sosa. HILJ, 52: 209 ss.
  • Stiglitz J. (2007). La globalizzazione che funziona. Torino: Einaudi.
  • Terwindt C., Leader S., Yilmaz Vastardis A., Wright J. (2018). Supply chain liability: pushing the boundaries of the common law?. JETL: 261...
  • Thompson R., Ramasastry A., Taylor M.B. (2009). Translating Unocal: the expanding web of liability for business entities implicated in international...
  • Ulfbeck V., Ehlers A.B. (2016). Tort Law, Corporate Groups and Supply Chain Liability for Workers’ Injuries: The Concept of Vicarious Liability....
  • Van Dam C. (2011). Tort law and human rights: brothers in arms. JETL: 221 ss.
  • Van Ho T. (2020). Vedanta Resources Plc and Another v. Lungowe and Others. AJIL, 114(1): 116 ss.
  • Weber R.H., Baisch R. (2016). Liability of Parent Companies for Human Rights Violations of Subsidiaries. -- Testo disponibile al sito: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2625536...