Leonardo da Vinci y la comparación ojo-cámara obscura

• Suarez Cardona, Carlos Aberto ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidad El Rosario
• Localización: Ideas y valores: Revista Colombiana de Filosofía, ISSN-e 0120-0062, Vol. 69, Nº. 174, 2020, págs. 143-171
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.15446/ideasyvalores.v69n174.85044
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Leonardo da Vinci and the Comparision Eye–Camera Obscura
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen
  • español

    Este artículo explora si hay algún fundamento sólido para atribuir a Leonardo da Vinci prioridad en la formulación del símil que lleva a concebir el ojo como una cámara obscura. Aquí, se defiende una posición pesimista. No obstante, el artículo resalta algunos aportes del pintor renacentista que pueden considerarse contribuciones a la consolidación del símil.

  • English

    The article explores whether there is any solid basis for attributing to Leonardo da Vinci the priority in formulating the simile that leads to conceiving the eye as a camera obscura. Here, a pessimistic position is defended, however, the article highlights some of Leonardo’s contributions to the consolidation of the simile.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Ackerman, J. “Leonardo´s Eye.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 41(1978): 108-146.
  • Alhacen. “De Aspectibus (i-iii).” [Aspectibus]. Alhacen’s Theory of Visual Perception. Ed. Mark Smith. Philadelphia: American Philosophical...
  • Aristoteles. Problemas [prob]. Trad. Ester Sanchez Millan. Madrid: Gredos, 2004.
  • Bacon, R. “De multiplicatione specierum.” Roger Bacon’s Philosophy of Nature. Ed. David. Lindberg. South Bend: St. Augustine’s Press, 1998....
  • Buchdahl, G. “Methodological Aspects of Kepler´s Theory of Refraction.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Sciences 3.3 (1972): 265-298.
  • Cardona, C. “Kepler: analogies in the search for the law of refraction.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 59 (2016): 22-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.05.004
  • Cardona, C. La piramide visual: evolucion de un instrumento conceptual. Bogota: Editorial Universidad del Rosario, en prensa.
  • Cardona, C. y Gutierrez, J. “The law of refraction and Kepler’s heuristic.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 74 (2020): 45-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00407-019-00236-w
  • da Vinci, L. “Manuscrito D.” [md]. Donald Sanderson, Leonardo da Vinci on the Eye: Thems d in The Biblioteque de l’Institut de France, Paris...
  • da Vinci, L. “Trattato della Pittura.” [tp]. The Literary Works of Leonardo da Vinci. Vol. 2. Ed. and trans. Jean Paul Richter. Nueva York:...
  • da Vinci, L “Notebooks.” [Notebooks]. The Notebooks of Leonardo da Vinci. Vol. 2. Ed. Jean Paul Richter. New York: Dover Publications, 1970b.
  • da Vinci, L. “Dibujos anatomicos.” [da]. Leonardo on the Human Body. Ed. Henry Chuman. Trad. Charles O’Malley. New York: Dover Publications,...
  • Durero, A. Unterweisung der Messung. Munchen: Wiesbaden Dr. Martin Sandig OHG, 1970.
  • Eastwood, B. “‘Quantitative’ Law of Refraction: A Chapter in the History of Nonexperimental Science.” Journal of the History of Ideas 28.3...
  • Gibson, J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. New York: Psychology Press, 2015.
  • Kemp, M. “Leonardo and the Visual Pyramid.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 40 (1977): 128-149.
  • Kepler, J. Optics: Paralipomena to Witelo & Optical Part of Astronomy [Paralipomena]. Trans. William Donahue. Santa Fe: Green Lion Press,...
  • Kemp, M. Leonardo da Vinci. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
  • Kepler, J. “Ad Vitellionem Paralipomena Quibus Astronomiae pars Optica traditur.” Gesammelte Werke [gw]. Vol ii. Ed. and comm. Franz Hammer....
  • Koyre, A. “Leonardo da Vinci, 500 años despues.” Estudios de historia del pensamiento cientifico. Trads. Encarnacion Perez y Eduardo Bustos....
  • Lindberg, D., ed. and trans. John Pecham and the Science of Optics, Perspectiva Communis. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1970.
  • Malebranche, N. Acerca de la investigacion de la verdad. Trad. Javier Barinaga-Rementeria. Salamanca: Ediciones Sigueme, 2009.
  • Noe, A. Action in Perception. Cambridge: The mit Press, 2006.
  • Pecham, J. “Perspectiva communis.” John Pecham and the Science of Optics. Ed. David Lindberg. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press,...
  • Ptolomeo. “Optics.” Ptolemy’s Theory of Visual Perception. Ed. Mark Smith. Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society, 1996. 67-261.
  • Raynaud, D. “La perspective aerienne de Leonard de Vinci et ses origines dans l´optique d´Ibn Al-Haytham (De Aspectibus, iii, 7).” Arabic...
  • Raynaud, D. A Critical Edition of Ibn al-Haytham’s On the Shape of the Eclipse. Cham: Springer Verlag, 2016.
  • Risner, F., ed. Opticae thesaurus Alhazeni Arabis libri septem… Item Vitellonis Thuringopoloni libri decem. Basile: Per episcopios, 1572.
  • Ronchi, V. “L’Optique de Leonard De Vinci.” Leonard De Vinci et L’experience Scientifique au xvie Siecle. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche...
  • Sabra, A. “Alhazen´s Optics in Europe: Some Notes on What It said and What It Did Not Say.” Inside the Camera Obscura–Optics and Art under...
  • Ed. Wolfgang Lefevre. Berlin: Max-Planck-Intitut fur Wissenschafts Geschichte, 2007. 53-57.
  • von Helmholtz, H. Treatise on Physiological Optics. Vol. 3. Trans. James Southhall. Mineola: Dover Publications, 2005.
  • White, M. Leonardo, el primer cientifico. Trad. Victor Pozanco. Barcelona: Plaza y Janes, 2001.
  • Witelo, E. “Perspectivae (i-x).” Opticae thesaurus Alhazeni Arabis libri septem… Item Vitellonis Thuringopoloni libri decem. Ed. Friedrich...