Derecho chino: una perspectiva comparada sobre las principales características en el caso de aplicación universal de los Reglamentos Europeos. Específicas observaciones relativas a la política de control de nacimientos

• Caterina Mugelli ^[1]
  1. [1] University of Florence

     University of Florence

     Firenze, Italia

     
• Localización: Actualidad jurídica iberoamericana, ISSN 2386-4567, Nº. 13, 2020 (Ejemplar dedicado a: El interés superior del menor en la experiencia jurídica latina), págs. 844-873
• Idioma: español
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Chinese Law: A comparative perspective of its main features in the event of the universal application of the EU Regulations. Remarks specifically regarding chinese birth control policy
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen
  • español

    Ya de por sí importante, el Derecho Privado europeo contenido en los Reglamentos está asumiendo una creciente relevancia. La aplicación universal es una de las características comunes del Derecho internacional privado europeo. La expresión utilizada por el legislador europeo suele ser la siguiente: “La ley designada como aplicable en el presente Reglamento se aplica también, aunque no sea la de un Estado miembro”. Prescindiendo de la elección que las partes (o la parte) hayan hecho, concluyendo un acuerdo sobre la ley aplicable, existe la posibilidad de que los jueces europeos se encuentren en la tesitura de tener que aplicar un Derecho desconocido para ellos. Dada la imponente inmigración china en Europa, este artículo trata de identificar los fundamentos del actual Derecho chino para facilitar al juez europeo la toma de decisiones coherente con un ordenamiento jurídico que no siempre se corresponde con los principios generalmente compartidos a nivel europeo, considerando en particular las políticas de planificación familiar y de control de nacimientos.

  • English

    Very important per se, European regulatory private law is gaining in importance. Universal application is a feature common to the instruments of European private international law. The wording used by the European legislator is usually the following: “The law designated as applicable by this Regulation shall be applied whether or not it is the law of a Member State”. Irrespective of whether the person(s) involved have made a choice-of-law agreement, there is a possibility that European judges will find themselves having to apply national laws unknown to them. In light of the massive Chinese migration to Europe, the aim of this paper is to identify the main pillars of current Chinese law, helping European judges in arriving at rulings consistent with a legal system not fully in tune with generally accepted European legal principles, considering in particular Chinese family planning and birth control policy

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Ahl, B.: “Advancing the Rule of Law through Education? An Analysis of the Chinese National Judicial Examination”, Issues & Studies, 2006,...
  • Basten, S., Jiang, Q.: “China’s Family Planning Policies: Recent Reforms and Future Prospects”, Studies in Family Planning, vol. 45, 2014,...
  • Bodde, D.: “Basic Concepts of Chinese Law: The Genesis and Evolution of Legal Thought in Traditional China”, Proceedings of the American Philosophical...
  • Bradley, D.: “A Note on Comparative Family Law: Problems, Perspectives, Issues and Politics”, Oxford U Comparative L Forum, 2005, no 4.
  • Brown R.C.: Understanding Chinese Courts and Legal Process: Law with Chinese Characteristics, Kluwer Law International, London-Boston-The...
  • Bruno, P.: I regolamenti europei sui regimi patrimoniali dei coniugi e delle unioni registrate, Giuffrè Francis Lefebvre, Milano, 2019.
  • Chen, A.H.Y., An Introduction to the Legal System of the People’s Republic of China, LexisNexis, Hong Kong, 2011.
  • Chen, J.: Chinese Law: Context and Transformation, N. Nijhoff, Leiden-Boston, 2015.
  • Chen, W.: The Beijing Consensus?: How China Has Changed Western Ideas of Law and Economic Development, Cambridge University Press, 2017.
  • Cremona, M.: “Opinions 1/13 and 2/13 and EU External relations law”, in FRANZINA, P.: (ed.), The External Dimension, Intersentia, Cambridge,...
  • Denby, C.: “Extraterritoriality in China”, American Journal of International Law, 1924, vol. 18, pp. 667-675.
  • DiamanT, N.J.: “Re-Examining the Impact of the 1950 Marriage Law: State Improvisation, Local Initiative and Rural Family Change”, The China...
  • Dicks, A.R.: “The Chinese Legal System: Reforms in the Balance”, China Quarterly, 1989, pp. 540-576.
  • Franzina, P. (ed.): The External Dimension of EU Private International Law After Opinion 1/13, Intersentia, Cambridge, 2017.
  • Halley, J., Rittich, K.: “Critical Directions in Comparative Family Law: Genealogies and Contemporary Studies of Family Law Exceptionalism”,...
  • Han, X., Zhang, W.: Contemporary value systems in China, Springer, Singapore, 2018.
  • Heilmann, S.: “Policy-Making through Experimentation: The Formation of a Distinctive Policy Process”, in. AA. VV.: Mao’s invisible hand. The...
  • Hua, S.: “Shen Jiaben and the Late Qing Legal Reform (1901–1911)”, East Asia, 2013, vol. 30, pp. 121-138.
  • Jernigan, T.R.: China in Law and Commerce, Macmillan, New York, 1905.
  • Liang, Z.: “Law Politics and Social Change: Codification in China Since 1902”, in AA.VV.: Codici: Una riflessione di fine millennio (ed. P....
  • Lin Z., Hou, S.: China’s Supreme Court, Routledge, New York, 2014.
  • Losano, M.G.: I grandi sistemi giuridici: introduzione ai diritti europei ed extraeuropei, Laterza, Roma 2000.
  • Lubman, S.: Bird in a Cage: Legal Reform in China after Mao, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1999.
  • Maccormack, G.: The Spirit of Traditional Chinese Law, The University of Georgia Press, Athens-London, 1996.
  • Menski, W.: Comparative Law in a Global Context: The Legal Systems of Asia and Africa, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006.
  • Micklitz, H-W.: “La mano invisibile del diritto private europeo in materia normativa. La trasformazione del diritto privato europeo dall’autonomia...
  • Micklitz, H-W.: “The internal vs. the external dimension of European private law – a conceptual design and research agenda”, EUI Working papers,...
  • Minzner, C.: “China After the Reform Era”, Journal of Democracy, 2015, vol. 26, pp. 129-143.
  • Moccia, L.: Il diritto in Cina, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino 2009.
  • MonaterI, P.G. (ed.): Methods of Comparative Law, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Northampton, 2012.
  • Peerenboom, R.: China’s Long March toward Rule of Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002.
  • Peerenboom, R.: China Modernizes: Threat to the West or Model for the Rest?, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007.Ponti, E.: La recezione...
  • Qin, Z., Zhou, G.: “Pursuing Perfection: Formation of the Qing Code”, Modern China, 1995, vol. 21, pp. 310-344.
  • Roberts, J.A.G.: Storia della Cina, il Mulino, Bologna, 2013.
  • Rossi, P.:, “Tra incorporazione e reinvenzione: riflessioni sistemologiche sulla recezione dei modelli giuridici nella Repubblica popolare...
  • Son, B.N.: “Sun Yat-Sen’s Constitutionalism”, Giornale di Storia Costituzionale, 2016, vol. 32, pp. 157-179.
  • Timoteo, M.: Circolazione di modelli e riforme giuridiche: il caso est-asiatico, Libreria Bonomo, Bologna, 2005.
  • Tomàšek, M., Mühlemann, G.: Interpretation of Law in China - Roots and Perspectives, Karolinum Press, Prague, 2011.
  • Watson, A.: Legal translants: an approach to comparative law, University press of Virginia, Charlottesville, 1974.
  • White, T.: China’s Longest Campaign Birth Planning in the People’s Republic, 1949- 2005, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y., 2006.
  • Yin, B.: “Chinese Socialist Legal System: Evolution and Principal Features”, in TOMÀŠEK, M., MÜHLEMANN, G.: Interpretation of Law in China...
  • Zhang, X.: “The New Round of Civil Law Codification in China”, University of Bologna Law Review, 2016, vol. 1, p. 106-137.