How Citizens Judge Extreme Legislative Dissent: Experimental Evidence from Canada on Party Switching

• John R. McAndrews ^[1] ; Feodor Snagovsky ^[2] ; Paul E.J. Thomas ^[3]
  1. [1] University of Toronto

     University of Toronto

     Canadá

     
  2. [2] Australian National University

     Australian National University

     Australia

     
  3. [3] Carleton University

     Carleton University

     Canadá

     

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: Parliamentary affairs: A journal of representative politics, ISSN 0031-2290, Vol. 73, Nº 2, 2020, págs. 323-341
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • Prior research suggests that voters prefer legislators who dissent from their party (e.g. by speaking out or rebelling in legislative votes) to those who remain loyal to their party. We examine whether this preference extends to extreme instances of dissent where legislators switch parties. Using what we believe is the first survey experiment to examine party switching, we show that, overall, Canadian voters are not more likely to approve of an MP’s decision to engage in this kind of extreme dissent than an MP who remains loyal to their party. Instead, respondents’ support for party switching—and the inferences they draw about legislators’ motivations for doing so—depend in predictable ways on their partisanship and policy attitudes. This suggests that there are important limits to voters’ endorsement of independent-mindedness among legislators.