Acceso usuarios
Pablo Manterola Domínguez
El comentario analiza la sentencia dictada por la Corte de Apelaciones de Santiago, que resolvió que dos accionistas obligados para con un tercero, lo han hecho en forma simplemente conjunta y no solidariamente como indica el contrato. La voluntad real de las partes habría sido obligarse directamente, porque el negocio concernía a ambos, no obstante tratarse de una venta de las acciones de uno de los dos accionistas. El comentario profundiza en la expresión del art. 1522 del Código Civil chileno: "Si el negocio para el cual ha sido contraída la obligación solidaria, concernía solamente a alguno o algunos de los deudores solidarios, serán éstos responsables entre sí", y somete a crítica la sentencia objeto de este estudio.
The commentary analyzes the sentence issued by the Court of Appeals of Santiago, which ruled that two shareholders bound to a third party, have done themselves simply liable and not jointly and severally liable, as indicated in the contract. The real will of the parties had been to be directly obligated, because the business referred to both, although the contract was a sell of the shares of one of them. The commentary studies the section 1522 of the Chilean Civil Code: "If the business for which the joint and several obligations had been contracted, concerned only to one or some of the jointly and severally obligated, these will be liable each other", and criticizes the judgement object of this work.
