Acceso usuarios
Gabriel Bello Reguera, Anisa Azaovagh de la Rosa
Este artículo aborda la contextualización de la ética de Butler en un marco teórico que da por supuesta la perspectiva deconstructiva y que, por su parte, es reconstruido de acuerdo a dos criterios, las nociones de “matriz disciplinal” y de “paradigma”. Mediante ellas se trata de proporcionar un sistema de conceptos o categorías usuales en la teoría ética en general, pero redefinidas en términos butlerianos.
This paper approaches the contextualization of Butler’s ethics in a theoretical framework that assumes the deconstructive perspective. It is reconstructed according to two criteria: the notions of “disciplinary matrix” and “paradigm”. Through them, it is a question of establishing a system of concepts or categories usual in ethical theory, in general, but redefined in butlerian terms. These categories to which I refer are action, subjects, judgements, and moral criteria. If we apply them to Butler’s ethic, it leads to a precarious ethic in which normative humanity would be impossible and, therefore, it cannot be used as a ground of a universal moral judgement. For instance, the precarious ethic suggested throughout the mourning for our people, victims of violence, from which is structurally excluded the humanity of the Others.
