Acceso usuarios
Rodolfo Montecinos Ohlagaray
El presente comentario de jurisprudencia analiza una sentencia de la Corte Suprema chilena que derogó tácitamente el artículo 76 del Decreto Ley Nº 1.094, de 1975, dado que, en su consideración, el contenido de la norma transgrede normas contenidas en la Constitución Política de la República, que tratan ciertos derechos que emanan de la naturaleza humana. Para la corte, el precepto impugnado perdió su vigencia; así, en virtud de sus potestades jurisdiccionales, estimó no aplicarlo para el caso particular
This work analyses a sentence of the Supreme Court of Chile that tacitly abolished the art. 74 of the D.L. Nº 1.094, 1975 provided that in his opinion, the content of the rule was not compatible to the Constitution, that treat some rights that have been conceived for his human nature.
According to the Court, the pre-constitutional precept lost validity and, in consequence, in use of his jurisdictional authority, estimated not to apply in this particular case.
This case is important for a relevant discussion, because recognize the attribution and exercise of their human rights for nationals and foreign, in particular for this last according to its migratory situation that keep in the chilean State. This work is trying for establish the juridical status of the foreign person who pretends the gratitude, in the exercise of his rights which has been given by his human nature, in presence of the State
