Acceso usuarios
1. Premessa. - 2. La competenza dell'Unione e le necessarie «implicazioni transnazionali» della materia. - 3. La nozione di «controversia transfrontaliera» nell' ambito degli strumenti dell'Unione europea che stabiliscono norme procedurali comuni.-4. (Segue): incoerenza delle soluzioni accolte con la portata applicativa delle norme (uniformi) sulla giurisdizione. - 5. La definizione di «controversia con implicazioni transnazionali» nella proposta del Parlamento europeo recante norme minime comuni di procedura civile. - 6. Considerazioni conclusive: opportunità di ripensare la portata applicativa verso l'esterno delle norme minime procedurali comuni?
When exercising its competence in the field of judicial cooperation in civil matters, the Union has increasingly adopted measures for the harmonization of civil procedures. consistently with legal basis (Art.81 TFEU), these measures have always been limited to cross.border matters. Purely internal matters are therefore excluded. However, definitions of cross-border matters lack uniformity in the measures adopted so far. The definitions adopted usually require a necessary link between al least two Member States. In this article, the Author raises some soubts as to the opportunity to maintain this limitation, in particular focusing on the broader scope of application of the rules on jurisdiction, since the latter deal also with matters involving a Member State and a third State (Owusu case). Its is suggested that the scope of application of the measures harmonizing civil procedures should be extended, in particular when such measures are adopted with the aim of improving access to justice.
