Repercusión de la Triple Helix y las Dificultades para Innovar en los Objetivos de Innovación: España, 2007-2013

• María Jesús Luengo-Valderrey ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

     Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

     Leioa, España

     
• Localización: Revista de estudios regionales, ISSN 0213-7585, Nº. 113, 2018, págs. 167-192
• Idioma: español
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Impact of the Triple Helix and the Difficulties to Innovate in the Innovation Aims: Spain, 2007-2013
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen
  • español

    La Triple Helix facilita y favorece la innovación que, a pesar de ser básica para la supervivencia empresarial en épocas de crisis, se ve negativamente afectada por las dificultades percibidas para hacerlo. Esta investigación, realizada con datos del Instituto Nacional de Estadística español, revela que, en las grandes empresas se afianza la relación positiva innovación-Triple Helix; mientras que en las PYMEs carece de importancia, prevaleciendo la incidencia de las dificultades. Las conclusiones animan a las empresas a entablar relaciones de colaboración con los ejes de la Triple Helix, para la adquisición y utilización de conocimiento para innovar.

  • English

    Surviving in a global world and in constant transformation requires, in large measure, to generate new knowledge and innovation capacity from it. In this sense, the application of information systems impels in a large degree both the diffusion of knowledge and innovation. In fact, the best ideas for innovation arise from the interaction between the company’s specific capabilities and external knowledge.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • AGHION, P., & HOWITT, P. (1992): “A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction”. Econometrica, 60(2), 323-361.
  • ARUNDEL, A. (1997): “Enterprise strategies and barriers to innovation”. En A. Arundel, R. Garrelfs, & E. Comosion (Ed.), Innovation measurement...
  • AUDRETSCHE, D., & KEILBACH, M. (2007): “The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship”. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 1242-1254.
  • BAGOZZI, R., & YI, Y. (1988): “On the evaluation of structural equation models”. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1(16), 74-94.
  • BALDWIN, J., & LIN, Z. (2002): “Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufactures”. Research Policy, 31, 1-18.
  • BECERRA, M., LUNNAN, R., & HUEMER, L. (2008): “Trustworthiness, risk, and the transfer of tacit and explicit knowledge between alliance...
  • BELDERBOS, R., CARREE, M., & LOKSHIN, B. (2004): “Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance”. Research Policy, 33, 1477–1492.
  • BENTLER, P. M. (1990): “Comparative fit indexes in structural models”. Psychological Bulletin(107), 238-246.
  • BIANCHINI, S., LISSONI, F., PEZZONI, M., & ZIRULIA, L. (2016): “The economics of research, consulting, and teaching quality: theory and...
  • CARAYANNIS, E., & CAMPBELL, D. (2009): Knowledge Creation, Diffusion and use in Innovation Networks and Knowldege Clusters: a Comparative...
  • CAVALLINI, S., SOLDI, R., FRIEDL, J., & VOLPE, M. (2016): Using the Quadruple Helix Approach to Accelerate the Transfer of Research and...
  • CHESBROUGH, H. (2003): Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Business...
  • COMMISSION EUROPEAN (2010): Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels: COM/2010/2020 final.
  • DAHEIM, C., & UERZ, G. (2008): Corporate foresight in europe: From trend based logics to open foresight. Technology Analysis & Strategic...
  • DAMANPOUR, F. (1991): “Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators”. Academy of Management Journal,...
  • DAMANPOUR, F., & GOPALAKRISHNAN, S. (1998): “Theories of organizational structure and innovation adoption: The role of environmental change”....
  • DODGSON, M. (2014): “Collaboration and innovation management”. En Dodgson, M., D. Gann, & N. Phillips, The Oxford Handbook of Innovation...
  • DUNCAN, R. B. (1972): “Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty”. Administrative Science Quarterly,...
  • EDQUIST, C., LUUKKONEN, T., & SOTARAUTA, M. (2009): Broad-Based Innovation Policy, Evaluation of the Finnish National Innovation System....
  • ETZKORWITZ, H., & LEYDESDORFF, L. (2000): “The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and mode 2 to a triple helix of university-industry-government...
  • ETZKOWITZ, H. (2002): “Networks of innovation: Science, technology and development in the triple helix era”. International Journal of Technology...
  • ETZKOWITZ, H. (2008): The triple helix: university-industry-government innovation in action. New York: Routledge.
  • ETZKOWITZ, H., & LEYDESDORFF, L. (1998): “The endless transition: a triple helix of university-industry-government relations”. Minerva,...
  • FITJAR, R., GJELSVIK, M., & RODRÍGUEZ-POSE, A. (2014): “Organizing product innovation: hierarchy, market”. The Triple Helix, 1(3), 1-21.
  • FREEL, M. (1998): “Evolution, Innovation and Learning: evidence from Case Studies”. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development Journal, 10(2),...
  • GALIA, F., & LEGROS, D. (2004): “Complementarities between obstacles to innovation: evidence from France”. Research Policy, 33, 1185-1199.
  • GARCÍA, D., & MARTÍNEZ, M. (2009): Innovación y Cultura Empresarial de las MIPYME (1 ed.). Aguascalientes, México: Universidad Autónoma...
  • GAZDA, E., & QUANDT, C. O. (2010): “Colaboração Interinstitucional em Pesquisa no Brasil: Tendências em Artigos na area de Gestão da Inovação”....
  • GILL, J., & JOHNSON, P. (2010): Research methods for managers (4 ed.). Londres: Sage Publications.
  • GROSSMAN, G., & HELPMAN, E. (1993): Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • HAGEDOORN, J., LINK, A., & VONORTAS, N. (2000): “Research partnerships”. Research Policy, 29, 567-586.
  • HAIR, J. F., ANDERSON, R. E., TATHAM, R., & BLACK, W. (1995): Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • HARGADON, A., & DOUGLAS, Y. (2001): “When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light”. Administrative...
  • HERNÁNDEZ-ESPALLARDO, M., & DELGADO-BALLESTER, E. (2009): “Product innovation in small manufacturers, market orientation and the industry’s...
  • HERRERA, H. (2009): “Investigación sobre redes sociales y emprendimiento: revisión de la literatura y agenda futura”. Innovar, 33, 19-34.
  • HU, L., & BENTLER, P. (1999): “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives”....
  • KOSACOF, B., & LÓPEZ, A. (2000): “Los cambios organizacionales y tecnológicos en las pequeñas y medianas empresas. Repensando el estilo...
  • LAWSON, B., & SAMSON, D. (2001): “Developing Innovation Capability in Organization”. International Journal of Innovation Managemente,...
  • LEYDESDORFF, L. (2000): “The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovation”. Research Policy, 29, 243-256.
  • LEYDESDORFF, L. (2012): “The Triple-Helix, Quadruple Helix, …, and an N-tuple of Helices: explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based...
  • LEYDESDORFF, L., DOLFSMA, W., & VAN DER PANNE, G. (2006): “Measuring the knowledge base of an economy in terms of Triple Helix relations...
  • LÖÖF, H., & BROSTROM, A. (2008): “Does knowledge diffusion between universities and ndustry increase innovativeness?” Journal of Technology...
  • LÓPEZ, A., & LUGONES, G. (1998): “Los tejidos locales ante la globalizacion del cambio tecnológico”. Revista Redes, 12, 13-44.
  • MESQUITA, L. E., & LAZZARINI, S. G. (2008): “Horizontal and vertical relationships in developing economies: Implications for SMEs’ access...
  • MIOZZO, M., & DEWICK, P. (2004): “Networks and innovation in European construction:benefits from interorganisational cooperation in a...
  • MIRAVITLLES MATAMOROS, P., GUITART TARRÉS, L., ACHCAOUCAOU IALLOUCHEN, F., & NÚNEZ CARBALLOSA, A. (2012): “El papel del entorno en la...
  • MOHEN, P., & ROLLER, L. (2005): “Complementarities in innovation policy”. European Economie Review, 24, 1431-1450.
  • MOHEN, P., & ROSA, J. (2000): Les obstacles à l’innovation dans les industries de services au Canada. Montreal: CIRANO Scientific Series.
  • MOHNEN, P., MAIRESSE, J., & DAGENAIS, M. (2006): Innovativity: a comparison across seven European countries. Cambridge: NBER Working Paper...
  • MONJON, S., & WALBROECK, P. (2003): “Assessing spillovers from universities to firms:evidence from French firm-level data”. International...
  • NELSON, R., & WINTER, S. (1977): “In search of a useful innovation theory”. Research Policy, 6, 36-76.
  • NIETO, M., & SANTAMARIA, L. (2007): “The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation”. Technovation,...
  • NORTH, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • PERKMANN, M., & WALSH, K. (2007). “University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda”. International journal...
  • PIATIER, A. (1984): Barriers to Innovation. London: Frances Printer.
  • POWELL, W., WHITE, D., KOPUT, K., & OWEN-SMITH, J. (2005): “Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration...
  • RADAS, S., & BOŽIć, L. (2009): “The antecedents of SME innovativeness in an emerging transition economy”. Technovation, 29(6-7), 438-450.
  • ROBIN, S., & SCHUBER, T. (2013): “Cooperation with public research institutions and success in innovation: Evidence from France and Germany”....
  • ROMER, P. (1990): !Endogenous technological change”. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 72-10.
  • ROPER, S., DU, J., & LOVE, J. (2008): “Modeling the innovation value chain”. Research Policy, 37, 961-977.
  • RUIZ, M., PARDO, A., & SAN MARTIN, R. (2010): “Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales”. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 34-45.
  • SAGUY, S. (2011): “Academia-industry innovation interaction: paradigm shifts and avenues for the future”. Procedia Food Science, 1, 1875-1882.
  • SAVIGNAC, F. (2006): “The impact of financial constraints on innovation: evidence from French manufacturing firms”. Cahiers de la MSE, 42.
  • SCHMOCH, U., & SCHUBERT, T. (2009): “Sustainability of incentives for excellent research – the German case”. Scientometrics, 81, 195-218.
  • SHAZIA, A., AMAT, S., & ARSLAN, U. (2015): “Organization Culture and Open Innovation: A Quadruple Helix Open Innovation Model Approach”....
  • THOMÄ, J., & ZIMMERMANN, V. (2016): “Göttinger Beiträge zur Handwerksforschung”. Innovationshemmnisse in KMU. Eine empirische Analyse...
  • TIWARI, A., MOHNEN, P., PALM, F., & VAN DER LOEFF, S. (2007): “Financial constraint and R&D Investment: Evidence from CIS”. United...
  • TOURIGNY, D., & LE, C. (2004): “Impediments to innovation faced by Canadian manufacturing firms”. Economics of Innovation and New Technology,...
  • VARGAS, J., MARTÍNEZ, M., & MOJICA, E. (2011): “Influencia de la Orientación al Mercado y la Innovación en la Internacionalización y el...
  • VASCONCELOS VALE, G., WILKINSON, J., & AMÂNCIO, R. (2008): “Empreendedorismo, inovaçao e redes: Uma nova abordagem”. RAE-Revista de Administraçao...
  • WILLIAMS, L., COTE, J., & BUCKLEY, M. R. (1989): “Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: reality or...
  • ZIMMERMANN, V. (2012): “Barriers to innovation in SMEs”. KfW Economic Research, 6(6). http://www.kfw.de/ kfw/en/I/II/Download_Center/Research/Fokus_PDF-Datein/Fokus_Nr__6_EN_2012.pdf.
  • ZIMMERMANN, V. (2015): “Innovationsfinanzierung. Herausforderung für mittelständische Unternehmen”. Corporate Finance (6), 183-190.