El realismo jurídico americano: Perspectivas de reconstrucción y nuevas trayectorias interpretativas

• Valeria Marzocco ^[1]
  1. [1] Università di Napoles - Federico II
• Localización: Derechos y libertades: Revista de Filosofía del Derecho y derechos humanos, ISSN 1133-0937, Nº 39, 2018, págs. 157-176
• Idioma: español
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Dialnet Métricas: 1 Cita
• Resumen
  • español

    Este artículo tiene como objetivo proporcionar una aproximación al Realismo Jurídico Norteamericano desde su exigencia de una jurisprudencia empírica. En el marco de la “revuelta contra el formalismo” que caracteriza la postura teórica de la ciencia social del periodo en la cultura estadounidense, juega un papel central la influencia de las ciencias psicológicas. Sin embargo, desde la interpretación de Lon Fuller, el behaviorismo psicológico parece ser, para los realistas, más una herramienta lingüística que una teoría, desde la perspectiva de la relación entre orden jurídico y orden social. Recientemente, Brian Leiter se ha centrado en este tema, argumentando que la “Core Claim” del Realismo se basa en una jurisprudencia naturalizada. Estas interpretaciones ayudan a considerar la contribución que el Realismo Jurídico Norteamericano ha ofrecido a la teoría jurídica.

  • English

    This paper aims to provide an approach to American Legal Realism under the lens of its empirical claim for jurisprudence. In the framework of the “revolt against formalism” that characterizes the theoretical attitude of social science of that period in American culture, the influence of psychological sciences plays a central role. Nevertheless, since Lon Fuller’s earl interpretation, psychological behaviourism seems to be for realists more a linguistic tool than a theory, in the perspective of the relationship between legal and social order. Recently, Brian Leiter has turned to focus on this topic, arguing that the ‘Core Claim’ of the Realism relies in a naturalized jurisprudence. These interpretations help to consider the contribute that American Legal Realism has offered to legal theory.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • A. F. BENTLEY y J. DEWEY, Knowing and The Known (1949) [trad. it.: Conoscenza e transazione, La Nuova Italia, Firenze, 1974, p. 164].
  • A. GIULIANI, “Dal positivismo ‘benthamiano’ al realismo giuridico”, en F. ROSSI-LANDI (coord.), Il pensiero americano contemporaneo, Edizioni...
  • B. LEITER, Naturalizing Jurisprudence. Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford-Nueva...
  • B. Z. TAMANAHA, Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide. The Role of Politics in Judging, Princeton University Press, Princeton- Oxford, 2009.
  • C. FARALLI, “Le eredità del realismo giuridico americano”, Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica, núm 1, 2006, pp. 119-126.
  • C. FARALLI, John Dewey. Una filosofia del diritto per la democrazia, CLUEB, Bologna, 1990;
  • C. L. HULL, “Moore and Callahan’s ‘Law and Learning Theory’: A Psychologist’s Impressions”, The Yale Law Journal, vol. 53, núm 2, 1944, pp....
  • Ch. BOYD, L. EPSTEIN y A. D. MARTIN, “Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging”, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 54, núm...
  • E. A. PURCELL, Jr., The Crisis of Democratic Theory: Scientific Naturalism and the Problem of Value, University of Kentucky Press, Lexington,...
  • E. PATTERSON, Jurisprudence: Men and Ideas of the Law [1940], The Foundation Press, Brooklin, 1953, p. 539).
  • E. S. ROBINSON, Law and the Lawyers, The MacMillan Co., New York, 1935, p. 49.
  • F. E. LUCEY, “Natural Law and American Legal Realism: Their Respective Contributions to a Theory of Law in a Democratic Society”, Georgia...
  • F. S. C. NORTHROP, “Underhill Moore’s Legal Science: Its Nature and Significance”, The Yale Law Journal, vol. 59, núm 2, 1950, pp. 196-213.
  • F. SCHAUER, “Legal Realism Untamed”, Texas Law Review, núm 91, 2012/2013, pp. 749-780.
  • F. SCHAUER, Thinking like a Lawyer. An Introduction to Legal Reasoning, Harvard University Press, Cambrigde [Mass] y en términos teórico-generales,
  • F.B. CROSS, “Decision making in the U. S. Circuit Courts of Appeals”, California Law Review, vol. 91, núm 6, 2003, pp. 1457-1516.
  • G. BOGNETTI, “Holmes e le origini del pensiero filosofico-giuridico americano del XX secolo”, Studi Urbinati, 1956-1957, pp. 51-138.
  • G. E. WHITE, “From Sociological Jurisprudence to Realism. Jurisprudence and Social Change in Early Twentieth-Century America”, Virginia Law...
  • G. H. T. MALAN, The Behavioristic Basis of the Science of Law, American Bar Association Journal, vol. 8, núm 12, 1922, pp. 737-741.
  • G. PRETI, “La ricostruzione filosofica della società nel pensiero di Dewey”, Studi Filosofici, vol. X, núm 1, 1949, pp. 37-74.
  • G. TARELLO, “Norma e giuridificazione nella Logica di Dewey”, Rivista internazio- nale di Filosofia del diritto, vol. 37, núm 2, 1960, p....
  • G. TARELLO, Il realismo giuridico americano, Giuffré, Milano, 1962, pp. 2 y ss.
  • H. E. YNTEMA, “‘Law and Learning Theory’ through the Looking Glass of Legal Theory”, The Yale Law Journal, vol. 53, núm 2, 1944, pp. 338-347;
  • H. J. LASKI, “Judicial Review of social policy in England”, Harvard Law Review, vol. 39, núm 7, 1926, p. 832.
  • H. L. A. HART, The Concept of Law, Oxford University Press, London, 1961 [trad. it.: Il concetto di diritto. Nueva edición con una posdata...
  • H. L. HART, “American Jurisprudence through English Eyes: The Nightmare and The Noble Dream”, Georgia Law Review, vol. 11, núm 5, 1977, pp....
  • H. OLIPHANT, “A Return to stare decisis”, American Law School Review, vol. 6, núm 5, 1928, p. 229).
  • H. S. ERLANGER et al., “Is It Time for a New Legal Realism?”, Winsconsin Law Review, núm 2, 2005, p. 337.
  • Herman Oliphant “A Return to Stare Decisis”, American Bar Association Journal, vol. 14, núm 2, 1928, pp. 71-76.
  • I. PUPOLIZIO, “Più realisti del re? Il realismo giuridico americano nella prospettiva dei “Critical Legal Studies”, Materiali per una storia...
  • J. DEWEY, “Logical Method and The Law”, Philosophical Review, vol. 33, núm 6, 1924, pp. 560-572 [trad. it.: “Metodo logico e diritto”, en...
  • J. DEWEY, Human Nature and Conduct. An Introduction to Social Psychology, Henry Holt and Co., New York, 1922, pp. 75 y ss.
  • J. FRANK, “Are Judges Human? Part Two: As Through a Class Darkly”, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, núm 80, 1931, p. 243.
  • J. FRANK, Law and the Modern Mind (1930), Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick-London, 2009, pp. 173 y ss.;
  • J. H. SCHLEGEL, “Between the Harvard Founders and the American Legal Realists: The Professionalization of the American Law Professor”, Journal...
  • John Henry Schlegel American Legal Realism and Empirical Social Science, University of North Carolina Press- American Society for Legal History,...
  • K. LLEWELLYN, “A Realistic Jurisprudence – The Next step”, Columbia Law Review, vol. 30, núm 4, 1930, pp. 431-465.
  • K. LLEWELLYN, “Some Realism about Realism: responding to Dean Pound”, Harvard Law Review, vol. 44, núm 8, 1931, pp. 1222-1264.
  • K. LLEWELLYN, The Common Law Tradition: Deciding Appeals, Little, Brown & Co., Boston, 1960, p. 204.
  • L. FULLER, “American Legal Realism”, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol. 82, núm 5, 1934, pp. 429-462;
  • L. KALMAN, Legal Realism at Yale, 1927-1960, University of California Press-American Society for Legal History, Chapel Hill- Londres, 1986.
  • M. BARBERIS, “For a Truly Realistic Theory of Law”, Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law, núm 29, 2016, pp. 7-14.
  • M. J. HORWITZ, The Tranformation of American Law 1870-1960. The Crisis of Legal Orthodoxy, Oxford University Press, Nueva York, 1992 [trad....
  • M. RADIN, “Legal Realism”, Columbia Law Review, vol. 31, núm 5, 1931, pp. 824-828.
  • M. RAITERI, “Il posto delle scienze sociali nel neo-realismo giuridico Americano”, Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica, núm 2,...
  • Morton White “The Revolt Against Formalism in American Social Thought of the Twentieth Century”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 8,...
  • N. DUXBURY, Patterns of American Jurispruence, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995, p. 3;
  • N. E. H. HULL, “Reconstructing the Origins of Realistic Jurisprudence: A Prequel to the Llewellyn-Pound Exchange over Legal Realism”, Duke...
  • N. E. H. HULL, Roscoe Pound & Karl Llewellyn. Searching for an American Jurisprudence, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago-London,...
  • P. CHIASSONI, “Richard Posner: pragmatismo e analisi economica del diritto”, en G. ZANETTI (coord.), Filosofi del diritto contemporanei, Cortina,...
  • R. M. CALCATERRA, Idee concrete. Percorsi nella filosofia di John Dewey, Marietti, Genova, 2003, pp. 52 y ss.
  • R. POSNER, The Problems of Jurisprudence, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1990, pp. 393-394.
  • R. POUND, “The Call for a Realist Jurisprudence”, Harvard Law Review, vol. 44, núm 5, 1931, pp. 697-711),
  • R. RORTY, “Overcoming the Tradition: Heidegger and Dewey”, The Review of Metaphysics, vol. 30, núm 2, 1976, pp. 280-305.
  • R. S. SUMMERS, Instrumentalism and American Legal Theory, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1982.
  • Th. CASADEI, “Aspetti della Dewey Reinassance: radicalismo social(democratico) e pluralismo dialogico”, Teoria politica, vol. 1, 2000, pp....
  • Th. J. MILES y C. R. SUNSTEIN, “The New Legal Realism”, The University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 75, núm 2, 2008, p. 835.
  • U. MOORE y Ch. CALLAHAN, “Law and Learning Theory: A Study in Legal Control”, The Yale Law Journal, vol. 53, núm 1, 1943, pp. 1-136.
  • U. MOORE y Th. HOPE, “An Institutional Approach to the Law of Commercial Banking”, The Yale Law Journal, núm 38, 1929, pp. 703-719
  • U. MOORE, “Rational Basis of Legal Institutions”, Columbia Law Review, vol. 23, núm 7, 1923, pp. 609-61;
  • W. E. VOLKOMER, The Passionate Liberal. The Political and Legal Ideas of Jerome Frank, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hauge, 1970.
  • W. J. SINGER, “Legal Realism Now”, California Law Review, vol. 76, núm 2, 1988, pp. 465-544.