La energía nuclear en España y el bien común: el diálogo como propuesta comunicativa para la aceptación social

• Autores: Enrique Cobos Urbina
• Localización: Ruta Comunicación, ISSN-e 2462-4888, Nº. 8, 2017, págs. 27-44
• Idioma: español
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Nuclear power in Spain and the common good: the dialogue as a communicative proposal for social acceptance
  • L'energia nuclear a Espanya i el bé comú: el diàleg com a proposta comunicativa per a l'acceptació social
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo  1    2  
• Dialnet Métricas: 7 Citas
• Resumen
  • español

    La baja legitimidad de la energía atómica en España y el reciente cierre de la central nuclear de Santa María de Garoña vuelven a reabrir el debate sobre la necesidad de esta fuente de energía para el país. En este artículo proponemos el diálogo entre las centrales nucleares y sus públicos como principio comunicativo que va a posibilitar el entendimiento mutuo y el consenso.

  • català

    La baixa legitimitat de l'energia atòmica a Espanya i el recent tancament de la central nuclear de Santa María de Garoña tornen a reobrir el debat sobre la necessitat d'aquesta font d'energia per al país. En aquest article proposem el diàleg entre les centrals nuclears i els seus públics com a principi comunicatiu que possibilitarà l'entesa mútua i el consens.

  • English

    The low legitimacy of nuclear power in Spain and the recent closure of the nuclear power plant of Santa María de Garoña back to reopen the debate on the need for this source of energy for the country. In this article we propose dialogue between nuclear power plants and their publics as communicative principle that will enable mutual understanding and consensus.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Alford, H., Naughton, M. (2002). Beyond the Shareholder Model of the Firm: Working toward the Common Good of a Business, en “Rethinking...
  • Argandoña, A. (1998). The Stakeholder Theory and the Common Good. Journal of Business Ethics, 17 (9), pp. 1093-1102.
  • Ashforth, B. y Gibbs, B. (1990). The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation. Organization Science, 1 (2), pp. 177-194.
  • Carroll, A. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders....
  • Carroll, A. (1998). The Four Faces of Corporate Citizenship. Business & Society Review, 100, pp. 1-7.
  • Carroll, A. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: The centerpiece of competing and complementary frameworks. Organizational Dynamics, 44,...
  • Castelo, M. y Lima, L. (2007). Positioning Stakeholder Theory within the Debate on Corporate Social Responsibility, Electronic Journal...
  • Cobos, E. (2012). Zugzwang: ¿Quién mueve? Lo que el ajedrez aporta a la comunicación de crisis. Pamplona: Ediciones Eunate.
  • Crane, A. y Livesey,S. (2003). Are you talking to me? Stakeholder communication and the risks and rewards ...
  • Dolphin, R.R. (1999). The fundamentals of corporate communication. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. Dowling, J. y Pfeffer, J. (1975).Organizational...
  • Elsbach, K. (1994). Managing Organizational Legitimacy in the California Cattle Industry: The Construction and Effectiveness of Verbal Accounts....
  • Enderle, G. y Tavis, L. (1998). A balanced concept of the Firm and the Measurement of its long-term planning and performance....
  • Ferri, L. M., Pedrini, M. y Pilato, V. (2016). The management of stakeholder dialogue in different institutional contexts:...
  • Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholderapproach. Boston: Pitman.
  • Freeman, R. y McVea, J. (2001). A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Management, en “Blackwell Handbook of Strategic...
  • Kent, M.L. y Taylor, M. (2014). Dialogic engagement: clarifying foundational concepts, Public Relations Review, 26 (5), pp. 384-398.
  • Kent, M. L. y Taylor, M. (2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations, Public Relations Review, 28 (1), pp. 21-37.
  • Mahon, J. y McGowan, R. (1991). Searching for the common good: A process-oriented approach. Business Horizons, 34 (4), pp. 79-86.
  • Matten, D. y Crane, A. (2005). Corporate Citizenship: Toward an extended theorical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review,...
  • Melé, D. (2002). Not only stakeholder interests: The firm oriented toward the common good, en “Rethinking the purpose of business:...
  • Melé, D. (2003). The challenge of humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics, 44 (44), pp. 77-88.
  • Minoja, M. (2012). Stakeholder Management Theory, Firm Strategy, and Ambidexterity.Journal of Business Ethics, 109 (1), pp....
  • Morsing, M. and Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response...
  • Ozdora, E., Ferguson. M. y Atakan, S. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and CSR fit as predictors of corporate reputation:...
  • Pieczka, M. (2011). Public relations as dialogic expertise? Journal of Communication Management, 15 (2), 108-124.
  • Smith, T. (1999). Aristotle on the Conditions for and Limits of the Common Good. The American Political Science Review, 93 (3),...
  • Salomon, R. (1994). The corporation as community. A reply to Ed. Hartman. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4 (3), pp. 271-285.
  • Suchman, M. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20 (3), pp....
  • Sulmasy, D. (2001). Four Basic Notions of the Common Good.St. John's Law Review 75 (2), pp. 303-311.
  • Velasquez, M. (1992). International Business, Morality, and the Common Good. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2 (1), pp. 27-40.
  • Waddock, S. y Smith, N. (2000). Relationships: The real challenge of corporate global citizenship, Business and society review, 105 (1), pp....
  • Wheeler, D. y Sillanpää, M. (1998). Including the stakeholders: The business case. Long Range Planning, 31 (2), pp. 201–210.