Los fundamentos probatorios del razonamiento probabilístico de David A. Schum

• Twining, William ^[1]
  1. [1] University College London

     University College London

     Reino Unido

     
• Localización: Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez, ISSN 0008-7750, Nº 52, 2018 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Bioética y Bioderecho), págs. 275-281
• Idioma: español

• Es reseña de:

  • Los fundamentos probatorios del razonamiento probabilístico

    David A. Schum

    Madrid : Xpress Estudio Gráfico y Digital, 2016

• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • En reseña de:Schum, David, Los fundamentos probatorios del razonamiento probabilístico, traducción y edición a cargo de Orión Vargas, Xpress Estudio Gráfico y Digital, 2016, 665 páginas.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Anderson, T. y Twining, W. (1991). Analysis of Evidence. Boston: Little Brown.
  • Anderson, T. (2003). Wigmore Meets the Last Wedge. En Twining y HampsherMonk (eds.). Evidence and Inference in History and Law: Interdisciplinary...
  • Anderson, T, D. Schum and Twining (2005). Analysis of Evidence. 2nd edn., Cambridge University Press.
  • Anderson, T. y Twining, W. (2014). Law and Archaeology: modified Wigmorean Analysis. En Robert Chapman and Alison Wylie (eds.) Material Evidence:...
  • Anderson, T y. Twining (2015). Evidential Reasoning in the International Tribunal for Rwanda: A Case Study of Tharcisse Muvunyi. 26 Criminal...
  • Bentham, J. (1810). An Introductory View of the Rationale of the Law of Evidence for Use by Non-lawyers as well as Lawyers (vi works 1-187....
  • Cohen, L. J. (1977). The Probable and the Provable. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dawid, P., Twining, W. y Vasalaki, M. (eds.) (2011). Evidence, Inference and Enquiry. London: British Academy.
  • Frank, J. (1949). Courts on Trial. Princeton University Press.
  • Haack, S. (2007). Defending Science within Reason: between scientism and cynicism. NY: Prometheus Books.
  • Kadane, J. y Schum, D. (1966). Probabilistic Analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti Evidence. New York: Wiley.
  • Roberts, P. y Redmayne (eds.) (2007). Innovations in evidence and proof: integrating theory, research and teaching. Oxford: Hart.
  • Roberts, P. y Aitken (2014). The Logic of Forensic Proof: Inferential Reasoning in Criminal Evidence and Forensic Science. London: Royal Statistical...
  • Schum, D. (1987). Evidence and Inference for the Intelligence Analyst, 2 vols. Lanham, Md., University of America Press.
  • Schum, D. A. y Tillers, P. (1989). Marshalling Evidence throughout the Process of Fact-Investigation: A Simulation National Science Foundation....
  • Schum, D. (1994). The Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning. Wiley.
  • Schum, D. (1999a). Marshaling Thoughts and Evidence during Fact Investigation. South Texas Law Review, vol. 40, 401-454.
  • Schum, D. (1999b). Probabilistic Reasoning and the Science of Complexity. Shanteau, J., Mellors. B., Schum, D. (eds.). Decision Science and...
  • Schum, D. (2000). Teaching about Discovery and Invention in Engineering. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 64, 209-223.
  • Schum, D. (2001a). Evidence Marshaling for Imaginative Fact Investigation. Artificial Intelligence and Law. Vol. 9, 165-188.
  • Schum, D. (2001b). Species of Abductive Reasoning in Fact Investigation in Law, Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 22, 1645-1681.
  • Schum, D. (2003). Evidence and inference about past events: an overview of six case studies. En W. Twining and I. Hampsher-Monk (eds.) Evidence...
  • Twining, W. (ed.) (1983). Facts in Law. Wiesbaden.
  • Twining, W. (2006). Rethinking Evidence: Exploratory Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wigmore, J. H. (1913). Principles of Judicial Proof, as Given in Logic, Psychology and General Experience Boston: Little, Brown; (2nd edn.,...
  • Zangwill, I. (1895). The Big Bow Mystery. Chicago: Rand, McNally.