La estrategia europea de la prevención de la delincuencia a través del incivismo a examen

• Autores: Anna Di Ronco
• Localización: Indret: Revista para el Análisis del Derecho, ISSN-e 1698-739X, Nº. 4, 2017
• Idioma: español
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen
  • español

    En la época reciente las políticas relativas a la prevención del delito (PD) en muchos países de la Unión Europea se han expandido hasta incluir la regulación de comportamientos incívicos y desordenados, y se han puesto en práctica a nivel local a través de medidas que a menudo han implicado una restricción severa de las libertades y derechos individuales. Tomando como análisis los documentos políticos de la Unión Europea disponibles en la base de datos EUR-lex, el presente trabajo analiza si la estrategia política sobre la prevención del delito se ha centrado también en la regulación de los actos incívicos. Además, se investiga si a nivel de la UE se ha prestado atención a la cuestión relativa a cómo las autoridades locales han ejercido sus poderes de prevención del delito en el ámbito del desorden urbano. En las conclusiones se comparan los resultados que emergen de la investigación en el contexto de la literatura existente sobre la legitimidad de la regulación de los actos incívicos, con el objetivo de establecer conclusiones que informen la estrategia de la UE sobre la prevención del delito referida a las molestias y su regulación.

  • English

    In recent years the crime prevention (CP) policies of many EU countries have been expanded up to including the regulation of uncivil and disorderly behaviour, and have been implemented at the local level through measures that have often excessively constrained individuals’ rights and freedoms. By drawing on the analysis of EU policy documents retrieved in the database EUR-lex, this paper investigates whether the European CP strategy has also focused on the regulation of incivilities. Furthermore, it inspects whether any attention has been paid at the EU level to how local authorities have exercised their CP powers in the field of urban disorder. In the conclusions, the emerging results are compared against the backdrop of the existing literature on the legitimacy of incivility regulation, with the aim to draw conclusions informing the EU CP strategy targeting nuisance and its regulation.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Baker, E. (2010). Governing Through Crime—the Case of the European Union. European Journal of Criminology 7(3): 187-213.
  • Burney, E. (2006). ‘No Spitting’: Regulation of offensive behaviour in England and Wales. In A.P. Simester and A. von Hirsch (eds.) Incivilities:...
  • Burney, E. (2009). Making People Behave: Anti-Social Behaviour, Politics and Policy. London: Routledge. Segunda edición.
  • Crawfoed, A. (2002). The governance of crime and insecurity in an anxious age: The transEuropean and the local. In: A. CRAWFORD (ed.) Crime...
  • Crawford, A. (2009a). Crime Prevention Policies in Comparative Perspective. Culmcott House: Willan Publishing.
  • Crawford, A. (2009b). Situating crime prevention policies in comparative perspective: Policy travels, transfer and translation. In: A. CRAWFORD...
  • Di Ronco, A. (2014). Regulating street prostitution as a public nuisance in the 'culture of consumption': A comparative analysis between...
  • Di Ronco, A. (forthcoming). ‘Public drunkenness as a nuisance in Ghent (Belgium) and Trento (Italy)’.
  • Di Ronco, A. and Peršak, N. (2014) Regulation of incivilities in the UK, Italy and Belgium: Courts as potential safeguards against legislative...
  • Duprez, D. and Hebberecht, P. (2002). The Politics of Crime Prevention and Security in the 1990s Across Europe. Brussels: VUB Press.
  • Edwards, A. and Hughes, G. (2005). Comparing the governance of safety in Europe: A geohistorical approach. Theoretical Criminology 9(3): 345-363.
  • Garland, D. (2001) The Culture of Control. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Hagemann, S. (2007). Applying ideal point estimation methods to the Council of Ministers. European Union Politics 8(2): 282–3.
  • Hömqvist, M. (2004). Risk assessments and public order disturbances: New European guidelines for the use of force?. Journal of Scandinavian...
  • Hughes, G. (1998). Understanding Crime Prevention: Social Control, Risk and late Modernity. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Hughes, G. and Edwards, A. (2005) Crime prevention in context. In: N. Tilley (ed.) Handbook of Crime Prevention and Community Safety. Cullompton:...
  • Kerezsi, K. (2014). Is there such a thing as a European crime control policy?. In: S. Body-Gendrot, M. Hough, K. Kerezsi, R. Levy and S. Snacken...
  • Millie, A. (2008a). Anti-Social Behaviour. McGraw-Hill International: Maidenhead.
  • Millie, A. (2008b). Anti-social behaviour, behavioural expectations and an urban aesthetic. British Journal of Criminology 48(3): 379-394.
  • Peršak, N. (2014). Norms, harms and disorder at the border: Legitimacy of criminal law intervention through the lens of criminalisation theory....
  • Peršak, N. (2016). Regulation and Social Control of Incivilities. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Sampson, R.J. and Raudenbush, S.W. (1999). Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods’....
  • Simester, A.P. and von Hirsch, A. (2006). Incivilities: Regulating Offensive Behaviour. Hart Publishing: Oxford.
  • Squires, P. (2006). New Labour and the politics of antisocial behaviour. Critical Social Policy 26(1): 144-168.
  • Squires, P. (2008). ASBO Nation: The Criminalisation of Nuisance. Bristol: The Policy Press.
  • Van Swaaningen, R. (2005). Public safety and the management of fear. Theoretical Criminology 9(3): 289-305.
  • Whitehead, C.M.E., Stockdale, J.E. and Razzu, G. (2003) The Economic and Social Costs of AntiSocial Behaviour. London: London School of Economics.
  • Wilson, J.Q. and Kelling, G. (1982). The police and neighborhood safety: Broken windows. Atlantic Monthly 127: 29-38.