Acceso usuarios
En la práctica no es extraño encontrarnos con concursos en los que la lista de acreedores que se acompaña a su solicitud por el propio deudor contiene una pluralidad de créditos que podrían quedar reducidos en puridad a un único acreedor real, por diversas causas que serán objeto de examen.
Este trabajo pretende abordar si cabe considerar lícita la actuación del deudor con un solo acreedor que solicita ser declarado en concurso, con una finalidad claramente distinta a la legalmente prevista, que no es otra que la satisfacción ordenada de los acreedores del deudor, de acuerdo con el principio par conditio creditorum; o si, por el contrario, nos encontraríamos ante un uso abusivo de quien utiliza un procedimiento, el concursal, justamente para poner trabas, impedir o condicionar la satisfacción del crédito de su único acreedor. Y ello por la desproporción de medios que supone poner en marcha dicha estructura procesal, con los costes que conlleva, obviando el proceso de ejecución singular, más sencillo y menos costoso, con las consecuencias y limitaciones en el ejercicio de sus derechos a que se somete al acreedor único en el ámbito procedimental del concurso.
In practice it is not unusual to find with bankruptcy cases in which the list of creditors enclosed in the bankruptcy filing made by the debtor itself includes a number of credits which could be, in fact, reduced to a single real creditor, for several reasons which will be examined in this essay.
The purpose of this essay is to consider whether it is licit for a debtor with a single creditor to file for bankruptcy, with a goal clearly different than that intended by the law, which is the orderly satisfaction of the creditors of the debtor, as stated by the principle of par conditio creditorum;
or if, on the contrary, this would constitute an abusive use by those who initiate a bankruptcy procedure specifically to complicate, impede or condition the satisfaction of the credit held by its single creditor. The aforementioned abuse would be caused not merely because a bankruptcy procedure requires the use of means disproportional means and efforts in this case as opposed to recurring to an individual enforcement of the credits, which is simpler and less expensive, but also because for the consequences and limitations to the exercise of rights imposed on the sole creditor within the framework of a bankruptcy procedure.
