Acceso usuarios
This paper is a preliminary comparative analysis of three polity-seeking nationalisms that emerged in the contiguous peripheral areas – the overlapping ‘spheres of influence’ of three contending imperial centres: Taiwan, Okinawa and Hong Kong. Specifically, it examines and compares the pattern of nation-formation and the form, ideology and politics of nationalism in each case, and in doing so it tries to suggest a possible explanatory framework for the rise of these nationalisms. Its tentative conclusion is that the rise of nationalism in Taiwan, Okinawa and Hong Kong should be understood as a macro-historical sociological phenomenon caused by both the short-term penetration from centralizing colonial and geopolitical centre(s) that triggered nationalist mobilization in the periphery and the long-term process of peripheral nation-formation that created the social basis for mobilization. The three cases also demonstrate some other traits of anti-centre peripheral nationalism: they all adopted a similar ideological strategy of indigeneity, and all developed a differentiation between radical and pragmatic lines characteristic of minority or peripheral nationalisms. A final observation is that while the geopolitics of states in the region is powerfully shaping the development of the three nationalisms, interactions on the societal level may over time create a counterforce from below.
