Kant’s Dynamic Hylomorphism in Logic

• Autores: Elena Dragalina Chernaya
• Localización: Con-textos Kantianos: International Journal of Philosophy, ISSN-e 2386-7655, Nº. 4, 2016, págs. 127-137
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen

  • The aim of this paper is to provide a dynamic interpretation of Kant’s logical hylomorphism. Firstly, various types of the logical hylomorphism will be illustrated. Secondly, I propose to reevaluate Kant’s constitutivity thesis about logic. Finally, I focus on the design of logical norms as specific kinds of artefacts.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Aumann, R. J. (2008), Rule-Rationality versus Act-Rationality. Center for the study of rationality: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
  • Bonnay, D. (2008), Logicality and Invariance // Bulletin of Symbolic Logic. Vol. 14. No. 1. P. 29–68.
  • Byrne, R.M.J. (1989), Suppressing valid inferences with conditionals // Cognition, vol. 31. P. 61–83.
  • Dutilh Novaes, C. (2012), Reassessing Logical Hylomorphism and the Demarcation of Logical Constants // Synthese, Vol. 185, Nº 3. P. 387–410.
  • Dutilh Novaes, C. (2011), The Different Ways in which Logic is (said to be) Formal // History and Philosophy of Logic, 32, no. 4. Р. 303-332.
  • Dragalina – Chernaya, E. (2016), The Roots of Logical Hylomorphism // Logical Investigations, Vol. 22, Nº2 (to appear)
  • Dragalina – Chernaya, E. (2015), Dilemmy logicheskogo gilemorfizma [The Dilemmas of Logical Hylomorphism] // Kantovsky Sbornik, 52 (2). P....
  • Dragalina – Chernaya, E. (2012), Ontologii dlya ∀belyara i ∃loizy [Ontologies for ∀belard and ∃loise]. M.: HSE Publishing House.
  • Carroll, L. (1895), What the Tortoise Said to Achilles // Mind, Nº4. P. 278–80.
  • Corcoran, J. (2009), Aristotle’s Demonstrative Logic // History and Philosophy of Logic, Vol. 30. Р. 1–20.
  • Feferman, S. (1999), Logic, Logics and Logicism // Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. Vol. 40. P. 31–54.
  • Frege, G. (1964). The Basic Laws of Arithmetic. Berkeley: University of California Press. Güth, W., R. Schmittberger, and B. Schwarze (1982),...
  • Hintikka, J. (2001), Is Logic the Key to All Good Reasoning? // Argumentation, Vol. 15. P. 39
  • Husserl, E. (1969), Formal and Transcendental Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Kant, I. (1998), Critique of Pure Reason. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Ed. Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Trans. Paul...
  • Kant, I. (1974), Logic. The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc.
  • Linnebo, Ø. (2003), Frege’s Conception of Logic: From Kant to Grundgesetze // Rev. Int. Fil., Campinas, V. 26, n. 2, pp. 235-252.
  • Lukasiewicz, J. (1957), Aristotle’s Syllogistic from the Stand point of Modem Formal Logic, 2nd ed., Oxford.
  • MacFarlane, J. (2004), In What Sense (If Any) Is Logic Normative for Thought? Draft of April 21, 2004.
  • MacFarlane, J. (2000), What does it mean to say that logic is formal? PhD dissertation, Pittsburgh University.
  • Rawls, J. (1995). Two Concepts of Rules // Philosophical Review, Nº1. P. 3 – 32.
  • Searle, J. R. (2005), What is an Institution? // Journal of Institutional Economics. Vol. 1, No. 1. P. 1-22.
  • Searle, J. R. (1969), Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sher, G. (1991), The Bounds of Logic: A Generalized Viewpoint. Cambridge: MIT.
  • Stenning, K. and van Lambalgen, M. (2008), Human Reasoning and Cognitive Science, Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Tarski, A. (1986), What are Logical Notions? // History and Philosophy of Logic. 1986. Vol. 7. P. 143–154.
  • Wittgenstein, L. (1978), Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, 3rd edition, Oxford.
  • Wittgenstein, L. (1977), Remarks on Colour. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Wittgenstein, L. (1958), Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Wittgenstein, L.(1922), Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.