El desempeño,la privaticación,los profesionales de la educación y el estado

• Autores: Stephen Ball
• Localización: Educación y ciudad, ISSN-e 2357-6286, ISSN 0123-0425, Nº. 14, 2008, págs. 115-137
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Dialnet Métricas: 4 Citas
• Resumen

  • Este artículo discute y analiza tres aspectos de la política educativa; estos aspectos son: i) el desempeñoentendido como la tecnología y la forma de regulación y reglamentación que utiliza juicios, comparaciones y demuestra como medidas de· la productividad o de resultados la valoración de individuos y de organizaciones; ii) la privatización, entendida como la utilización de distintas formas de mercado para reformar las instituciones públicas del sector educativo, (privatización endógena) o la presencia de proveedores privados que ofrecen servicios educativos (privatización exógena); iii) los cambios en las formas y modalidades en la cual el estado, se transforma de un gobierno, (burocracia y administración) a un control (ejercido por empresas y redes). En el centro de esta infraestructura de la política coloco al profesor, al maestro. - al profesional de la educación- como sujeto de la reforma educativa. Clasifico también, de forma amplia, tres distintos tipos de literatura y, lo que destaco con mayor importancia, asumo una posición personal dentro de una intersección caracterizada por incitaciones y seducciones inmersas en la reforma del sector educativo

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Citas Ball, S. J. Education Ple: Understanding private sector
  • participation in public sector education, Routledge,
  • London. 2007a.
  • Ball, S. J. Privatising Education, Privatising Education
  • Policy, Privatising Educational Research: network
  • governance and the 'competition state'. The Routledge
  • Lecture, In British Educational Research Association
  • London. 2007b.
  • Baumann, Z. Modernity and Ambivalence, Oxford:
  • Polity Press. 1991.
  • Bernstein, B. Pedagogy Symbolic Control and Identity,
  • Taylor and Francis, London. 1996.
  • Broadhead, L.-A. and Howard, S. The Art of Punishing:
  • The Research Assessment Exercise and the Ritualisation
  • of Power in Higher Education, Education Policy Analysis
  • Archives, 6. 1998.
  • Butler, J. Undoing Gender, Routledge, New York and
  • London. 2 004.
  • Campbell, C., Evans, J., Askew, S., Hughes, M. and
  • McCallum, B. Evaluation of Education Partnership
  • Boards, Institute of Education, University of London,
  • London. 2 004.
  • Canaan, J. A Funny thing happened on the way to
  • the (European Social) forum: or how new forms of
  • accountabilit:)T are transforming academic's identities
  • and possible responses. 2008.
  • Davies, B. and Petersen, E. B. Neo-Liberal discourse
  • and the academ;-: the f orestalling of ( collective)
  • resistance, Learning and Teaching in the Social Sciences,
  • 77-79. 2005.
  • Davies, B. and Petersen, E. B. Neo-Liberal discourse and
  • the academy: the f orestalling of ( collective) resistance,
  • Learning and Teaching in the Social Sciences, 2, 77-97.
  • Dillabough, J .A. 'Gender poli tics and conceptions of the
  • modern teacher: women, identity and professionalism'.
  • British J ournal of Sociology of Education, 2 O, 3 7 3-94.
  • Falk, C. 'Sente11cing learners to life'. Theory, Technology
  • and Culture, 22, 19-27. 1999.
  • Foucault, M. Discipline and Punish. Harmondsworth:
  • Penguin. 197 9.
  • Foucault, M. The Subject and Power: afterword to, In
  • Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and
  • Hermeneutics (Eds, Dreyfus, H. and Rabinow, P.)
  • University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 1983.
  • Gee, J. New people in new worlds: networks, the new
  • capitalism and schools, In Multiliteracies: literacy
  • learning and the design of social futures (Eds, Cope, B.
  • and Kalantzis, M.) Routledge, London.1999.
  • Gray, A. Contract Culture and target fetishism:
  • the distortive effects of output measures on local
  • regeneration programmes, Local Economy, 11 (4), 343
  • - 357. 1997.
  • Hunter, I. Assembling the School, In Foucault and
  • Political Reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and
  • rationalities of government(Eds, Barry, A., Os borne, T.
  • and Rose, N.) UCL Press, London. 1996.
  • Jessop, B. The rise of governance and the risks of
  • failure'. International Social Science J ournal, 5 O
  • (155), 29-45. 1998.
  • Kickert, W J. M., Klijn, E. H. and Koppenjan, J. F.
  • M. Managing networks in the piblic sector: Findings
  • and Reflections, In Managing Complex Networks:
  • Strategies fo the Public Sector(Eds, Kickert, W J. M.,
  • Klijn, E. H. and Koppenjan, J. F. M.) Sage, Thousand
  • Oaks: CA. 1997.
  • Latour, B. Science in Action: Ho\v to follow scientist and
  • engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard:,
  • University Press. 1987.
  • Leys, M. (2001) Market-Driven Poli tics, Verso,
  • London.
  • Lyotard, J. -F. The on Knowledge,
  • Manchester.1984. Postmodern Condition: A Report
  • Manchester University Press,
  • MacKinnon, D. Managerialism, governmentality and
  • the state: a neo-Foucauldian approach to local economic
  • governance, Political Geography, 19, 293-314. 2000.
  • MacKinnon, D. Managerialism, governmentality
  • and the state: a neo-Foucauldian approach to local
  • economic governance, Political Geography, 19 ( 3),
  • 314. 2000.
  • Mahony, P., Hextall and Menter, I. Threshold assessment
  • and performance management: modernizing or
  • masculinizing teaching in England, Gender and
  • Education, 16, 131-149. 2 004a.
  • Mahony, P., Menter, I. and Hextall The emotional
  • impact of performance-related pay on teachers in
  • England, British Educational Research Journal, 30,
  • 456. 2004b.
  • Mackenzie, R. and Lucio, M.M. 'The realities of
  • regulatory change: beyond the fetish of deregulation'.
  • British Journal of Sociology, 39, 499-314. 2005.
  • Marinetto, M. 'Governing beyond th~ centre: a critique
  • of the anglo-governance school'. Political Studies, 51,
  • 608. 2003.
  • Morley, L. Quality and Power in Higher Education,
  • Open University Press, Maidenhead. 2003.
  • Nevvman, J. Modernising Governance: New Labour,
  • Policy and Society, Sage, London. 2001.
  • Nietzsche, F. Untimely Meditations, Cambridge:
  • Cambridge University Press. 19 8 3.
  • O'Flynn, G. and Petersen, E. B. The 'good life' and
  • the 'rich portfolio': young women, schooling and neoliberal
  • subjectification, British J ournal of Sociology of
  • Education, 28,459-472. 2007.
  • O'Sullivan, D. Cultural Politics and Irish Education
  • since the 19 50s: Policy Paradigms and Power, Institute
  • of Public Administration, Dublin. 2005.
  • Patrinos, H. A. Education Contracting: Scope for Future
  • Research, In Mobilizing the Prívate Sector for Public
  • Educationco-sponsored by the World Bank, Kennedy
  • School of Government, Harvard University. 2005.
  • Perryman, J. Panoptic performativity and school
  • inspection regimes: disciplinary mechanisms and life
  • under special measures J ournal of Education Policy, 21,
  • 161. 2006.
  • Perryman, J. Inspection and Emotion, Cambridge
  • J ournal of Education, 3 7, 17 3-190.
  • Power, M. The audit explotion. London:
  • Demos.2007 .1994.
  • Richards, D. and Smith, M.J. Governance and public
  • policy in the United Kingdom. Oxf ord: Oxf ord
  • University Press. 2002.
  • Rose, N. Governing ''advanced'' liberal democracies,
  • In Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, neoliberalism
  • and rationalities of government(Eds, Barry,
  • A., Osborne, T. and Rose, N.) UCL Press, London.
  • Saltman, K. J. Collateral Damage: Corporatizing public
  • schools - A threat to democracy, Rowan and Littlefield,
  • Lanham: Maryland. 2002.
  • Saltman, K. J. The Edison Schools: Corporate Schooling
  • and the Assault on Public Education, Routledge, New
  • rk. 2005.
  • Shore, C. and Wright, S. Audit Culture andAnthropology:
  • neo-liberalism in British Higher Education, El
  • desempeño, la privatización, los profesionales de
  • la educación y el estado. The Journal of the Royal
  • Anthropological Institute, 5, 5 57-57 5. 1999.
  • Slater, D. and Tonkiss, F. Market Society, Polity Press,
  • Cambridge.2001.
  • Sparkes, A. C. Embodiment, academics and the audit
  • culture: Astory seeking consideration, Qualitative
  • Research, 7. 2 007.
  • Strathern, M. 'Improving ratings: audit in the British
  • university system'. European Review, 5, 305 - 21.
  • ViTincent-J ones, P. The newpublic contracting: regulation,
  • responsiveness, relationality. Oxf ord: Oxf ord University
  • Press. 2006.
  • Yeatman, A. The New Contractualism: Management
  • Reform or a New Approach to Governance?, In New
  • Ideas, Better Government(Eds, Davis, G. and Weller,
  • P.) Allen and Unwin, St Leonards, Australia. 1996.
  • Zambeta, E. Modernisation of Educational Governance
  • in Greece: from state control to state steering, European
  • Educational Research Journal, 1, 637-655. 2002.