Acceso usuarios
Carlos Gil de Gómez Pérez-Aradros
La libertad -su ejercicio y su titularidad- ha sido un tema recurrente en el pensamiento a lo largo de la Historia. No obstante, cada autor que se ha acercado a ella la ha interpretado de un modo distinto; incluso dentro de la misma escuela de pensamiento. Así las cosas, este estudio pretende contraponer y enfrentar la diferente visión que de la libertad han tenido tres de los intelectuales más influyentes del siglo XX: F. Hayek, Isaiah Berlin y J. Rawls.
Freedom – his exercise and ownership- has been a central theme in the thinking of the social sciences throughout its existence. However, each school of thought has defined and addressed his study from different points of view. For this reason , this research presents and contrasts studies of three of the most influential writers of the twentieth century: F. Hayek, Isaiah Berlin and J. Rawls. This doctrinal opposition will allow to conclude that liberal freedom swings between autoderminación and recognition. Through the major original texts of these three authors and others and using an analytical –comparative methodology are achieved outline the different contours of liberal freedom and its links to self– determination and due recognition. Similarly, it is possible to open and a debate on the different projection of freedom in today’s liberalism.
